From: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Cc: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@intel.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
pbonzini@redhat.com, jmattson@google.com,
yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/9] KVM: VMX: Set guest CET MSRs per KVM and host configuration
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 22:07:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200424140751.GE24039@local-michael-cet-test> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200423162749.GG17824@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 09:27:49AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 04:18:39PM +0800, Yang Weijiang wrote:
> > @@ -3033,6 +3033,13 @@ void vmx_set_cr3(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr3)
> > vmcs_writel(GUEST_CR3, guest_cr3);
> > }
> >
> > +static bool is_cet_mode_allowed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 mode_mask)
>
> CET itself isn't a mode. And since this ends up being an inner helper for
> is_cet_supported(), I think __is_cet_supported() would be the way to go.
>
> Even @mode_mask is a bit confusing without the context of it being kernel
> vs. user. The callers are very readable, e.g. I'd much prefer passing the
> mask as opposed to doing 'bool kernel'. Maybe s/mode_mask/cet_mask? That
> doesn't exactly make things super clear, but at least the reader knows the
> mask is for CET features.
Make sense, will change it.
>
> > +{
> > + return ((supported_xss & mode_mask) &&
> > + (guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_SHSTK) ||
> > + guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_IBT)));
> > +}
> > +
> > int vmx_set_cr4(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr4)
> > {
> > struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
> > @@ -7064,6 +7071,35 @@ static void update_intel_pt_cfg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > vmx->pt_desc.ctl_bitmask &= ~(0xfULL << (32 + i * 4));
> > }
> >
> > +static void vmx_update_intercept_for_cet_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > +{
> > + struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
> > + unsigned long *msr_bitmap = vmx->vmcs01.msr_bitmap;
> > + bool flag;
>
> Maybe s/flag/incpt or something to make it more obvious that the bool is
> true if we want to intercept? vmx_set_intercept_for_msr()s's @value isn't
> any better :-/.
I prefer using incpt now ;-)
> > +
> > + flag = !is_cet_mode_allowed(vcpu, XFEATURE_MASK_CET_USER);
> > + /*
> > + * U_CET is required for USER CET, and U_CET, PL3_SPP are bound as
> > + * one component and controlled by IA32_XSS[bit 11].
> > + */
> > + vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap, MSR_IA32_U_CET, MSR_TYPE_RW, flag);
> > + vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap, MSR_IA32_PL3_SSP, MSR_TYPE_RW, flag);
> > +
> > + flag = !is_cet_mode_allowed(vcpu, XFEATURE_MASK_CET_KERNEL);
> > + /*
> > + * S_CET is required for KERNEL CET, and PL0_SSP ... PL2_SSP are
> > + * bound as one component and controlled by IA32_XSS[bit 12].
> > + */
> > + vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap, MSR_IA32_S_CET, MSR_TYPE_RW, flag);
> > + vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap, MSR_IA32_PL0_SSP, MSR_TYPE_RW, flag);
> > + vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap, MSR_IA32_PL1_SSP, MSR_TYPE_RW, flag);
> > + vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap, MSR_IA32_PL2_SSP, MSR_TYPE_RW, flag);
> > +
> > + flag |= !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_SHSTK);
> > + /* SSP_TAB is only available for KERNEL SHSTK.*/
> > + vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap, MSR_IA32_INT_SSP_TAB, MSR_TYPE_RW, flag);
> > +}
> > +
> > static void vmx_cpuid_update(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > {
> > struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
> > @@ -7102,6 +7138,10 @@ static void vmx_cpuid_update(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > vmx_set_guest_msr(vmx, msr, enabled ? 0 : TSX_CTRL_RTM_DISABLE);
> > }
> > }
> > +
> > + if (guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_SHSTK) ||
> > + guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_IBT))
> > + vmx_update_intercept_for_cet_msr(vcpu);
>
> This is wrong, it will miss the case where userspace double configures CPUID
> and goes from CET=1 to CET=0. This should instead be:
>
> if (supported_xss & (XFEATURE_MASK_CET_KERNEL | XFEATURE_MASK_CET_USER))
> vmx_update_intercept_for_cet_msr(vcpu);
>
> > }
Here CET=1/0, did you mean the CET bit in XSS or CR4.CET? If it's the
former, then it's OK for me.
> >
> > static __init void vmx_set_cpu_caps(void)
> > --
> > 2.17.2
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-24 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-26 8:18 [PATCH v11 0/9] Introduce support for guest CET feature Yang Weijiang
2020-03-26 8:18 ` [PATCH v11 1/9] KVM: VMX: Introduce CET VMX fields and flags Yang Weijiang
2020-04-23 16:07 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-04-24 13:39 ` Yang Weijiang
2020-04-23 16:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-04-24 13:44 ` Yang Weijiang
2020-03-26 8:18 ` [PATCH v11 2/9] KVM: VMX: Set guest CET MSRs per KVM and host configuration Yang Weijiang
2020-04-23 16:27 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-04-24 14:07 ` Yang Weijiang [this message]
2020-04-24 14:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-04-25 9:14 ` Yang Weijiang
2020-04-25 13:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-26 15:26 ` Yang Weijiang
2020-03-26 8:18 ` [PATCH v11 3/9] KVM: VMX: Set host/guest CET states for vmexit/vmentry Yang Weijiang
2020-04-01 2:23 ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-23 17:17 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-04-24 14:35 ` Yang Weijiang
2020-04-24 14:49 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-04-25 9:20 ` Yang Weijiang
2020-04-27 17:04 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-04-27 17:56 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-26 8:18 ` [PATCH v11 4/9] KVM: VMX: Check CET dependencies on CR settings Yang Weijiang
2020-04-23 17:20 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-04-24 14:36 ` Yang Weijiang
2020-03-26 8:18 ` [PATCH v11 5/9] KVM: X86: Refresh CPUID once guest XSS MSR changes Yang Weijiang
2020-04-23 17:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-04-24 14:47 ` Yang Weijiang
2020-04-25 13:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-26 15:01 ` Yang Weijiang
2020-03-26 8:18 ` [PATCH v11 6/9] KVM: X86: Load guest fpu state when access MSRs managed by XSAVES Yang Weijiang
2020-03-26 8:18 ` [PATCH v11 7/9] KVM: X86: Add userspace access interface for CET MSRs Yang Weijiang
2020-03-28 7:40 ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-23 18:14 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-04-24 15:02 ` Yang Weijiang
2020-04-24 15:10 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-04-25 9:28 ` Yang Weijiang
2020-04-25 15:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-26 15:23 ` Yang Weijiang
2020-04-27 14:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-28 13:41 ` Yang Weijiang
2020-03-26 8:18 ` [PATCH v11 8/9] KVM: VMX: Enable CET support for nested VM Yang Weijiang
2020-04-23 18:29 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-04-24 15:24 ` Yang Weijiang
2020-03-26 8:18 ` [PATCH v11 9/9] KVM: X86: Set CET feature bits for CPUID enumeration Yang Weijiang
2020-03-27 4:41 ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-23 16:56 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-04-24 14:17 ` Yang Weijiang
2020-04-23 16:58 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-04-24 14:23 ` Yang Weijiang
2020-03-26 8:18 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] x86: Add tests for user-mode CET Yang Weijiang
2020-04-23 15:51 ` [PATCH v11 0/9] Introduce support for guest CET feature Sean Christopherson
2020-04-24 13:31 ` Yang Weijiang
2020-04-23 16:03 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-04-24 13:34 ` Yang Weijiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200424140751.GE24039@local-michael-cet-test \
--to=weijiang.yang@intel.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).