public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	Jason Herne <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>,
	Jared Rossi <jrossi@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] s390x/vfio-ccw: Channel Path Handling [KVM]
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 12:05:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200518120554.6b7b04cd.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200505122745.53208-1-farman@linux.ibm.com>

On Tue,  5 May 2020 14:27:37 +0200
Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> Here is a new pass at the channel-path handling code for vfio-ccw.
> Changes from previous versions are recorded in git notes for each patch.
> Patches 5 through 7 got swizzled a little bit, in order to better
> compartmentalize the code they define. Basically, the IRQ definitions
> were moved from patch 7 to 5, and then patch 6 was placed ahead of
> patch 5.
> 
> I have put Conny's r-b's on patches 1, 3, 4, (new) 5, and 8, and believe
> I have addressed all comments from v3, with two exceptions:
> 
> > I'm wondering if we should make this [vfio_ccw_schib_region_{write,release}]
> > callback optional (not in this patch).  
> 
> I have that implemented on top of this series, and will send later as part
> of a larger cleanup series.
> 
> > One thing though that keeps coming up: do we need any kind of
> > serialization? Can there be any confusion from concurrent reads from
> > userspace, or are we sure that we always provide consistent data?  
> 
> I _think_ this is in good shape, though as suggested another set of
> eyeballs would be nice. There is still a problem on the main
> interrupt/FSM path, which I'm not attempting to address here.
> 
> With this code plus the corresponding QEMU series (posted momentarily)
> applied I am able to configure off/on a CHPID (for example, by issuing
> "chchp -c 0/1 xx" on the host), and the guest is able to see both the
> events and reflect the updated path masks in its structures.
> 
> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20200417023001.65006-1-farman@linux.ibm.com/
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20200206213825.11444-1-farman@linux.ibm.com/
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20191115025620.19593-1-farman@linux.ibm.com/
> 
> Eric Farman (3):
>   vfio-ccw: Refactor the unregister of the async regions
>   vfio-ccw: Refactor IRQ handlers
>   vfio-ccw: Add trace for CRW event
> 
> Farhan Ali (5):
>   vfio-ccw: Introduce new helper functions to free/destroy regions
>   vfio-ccw: Register a chp_event callback for vfio-ccw
>   vfio-ccw: Introduce a new schib region
>   vfio-ccw: Introduce a new CRW region
>   vfio-ccw: Wire up the CRW irq and CRW region
> 
>  Documentation/s390/vfio-ccw.rst     |  38 ++++++-
>  drivers/s390/cio/Makefile           |   2 +-
>  drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_chp.c     | 148 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c     | 165 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c     |  65 ++++++++---
>  drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h |  16 +++
>  drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_trace.c   |   1 +
>  drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_trace.h   |  30 +++++
>  include/uapi/linux/vfio.h           |   3 +
>  include/uapi/linux/vfio_ccw.h       |  18 +++
>  10 files changed, 458 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_chp.c
> 

Thanks, applied.

The documentation needed a bit of fiddling (please double-check), and I
think we want to document error codes for the schib/crw regions as
well. I can do that if I find time, but I'd also happily merge a patch.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-05-18 10:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-05 12:27 [PATCH v4 0/8] s390x/vfio-ccw: Channel Path Handling [KVM] Eric Farman
2020-05-05 12:27 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] vfio-ccw: Introduce new helper functions to free/destroy regions Eric Farman
2020-05-05 12:27 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] vfio-ccw: Register a chp_event callback for vfio-ccw Eric Farman
2020-05-06 13:18   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-05-05 12:27 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] vfio-ccw: Refactor the unregister of the async regions Eric Farman
2020-05-05 12:27 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] vfio-ccw: Introduce a new schib region Eric Farman
2020-05-05 12:27 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] vfio-ccw: Refactor IRQ handlers Eric Farman
2020-05-05 12:27 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] vfio-ccw: Introduce a new CRW region Eric Farman
2020-05-06 13:24   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-05-05 12:27 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] vfio-ccw: Wire up the CRW irq and " Eric Farman
2020-05-06 13:52   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-05-05 12:27 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] vfio-ccw: Add trace for CRW event Eric Farman
2020-05-05 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 0/8] s390x/vfio-ccw: Channel Path Handling [KVM] Cornelia Huck
2020-05-05 13:00   ` Eric Farman
2020-05-06 13:59     ` Cornelia Huck
2020-05-18 10:05 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2020-05-18 10:14   ` Eric Farman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200518120554.6b7b04cd.cohuck@redhat.com \
    --to=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jrossi@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox