From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PULL_REQUEST, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A31FC433DF for ; Thu, 28 May 2020 14:23:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DEBA207D3 for ; Thu, 28 May 2020 14:23:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="dz6NPnhJ" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2391117AbgE1OXF (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 May 2020 10:23:05 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.120]:56257 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2391035AbgE1OWw (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 May 2020 10:22:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1590675771; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=lJAE3W4i6ShVxeRfUH/bQwuRjs3nBOGoAWqm9myFCPw=; b=dz6NPnhJPKteYo/RPAU4/5RHF+imHDWXnb+fIqvVw0ARkw9kW9bkuk7DaUpPAX5eeX9B+T N2dRIOJnGQzL7H4+5Uob0hpsY8wlT55RqmmIQnz9FoBnqxqr4Ovvh3npRWuUKlRrtK37MM r2ELxk1Z46YoDpnLKfsK6RStTiUDDQk= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-414-Akt7k8GuMKaJnQE7t8yySw-1; Thu, 28 May 2020 10:22:49 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Akt7k8GuMKaJnQE7t8yySw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0A2F1005512; Thu, 28 May 2020 14:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gondolin (ovpn-113-28.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.113.28]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2132860C05; Thu, 28 May 2020 14:22:45 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 16:22:43 +0200 From: Cornelia Huck To: Vasily Gorbik Cc: Heiko Carstens , Christian Borntraeger , Eric Farman , Halil Pasic , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PULL 00/10] vfio-ccw patches for 5.8 Message-ID: <20200528162243.7ee3a352.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20200525094115.222299-1-cohuck@redhat.com> Organization: Red Hat GmbH MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 28 May 2020 14:42:31 +0200 Vasily Gorbik wrote: > On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 11:41:05AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > The following changes since commit 6a8b55ed4056ea5559ebe4f6a4b247f627870d4c: > > > > Linux 5.7-rc3 (2020-04-26 13:51:02 -0700) > > > > are available in the Git repository at: > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvms390/vfio-ccw tags/vfio-ccw-20200525 > > Hello Conny, > > s390/features is based on v5.7-rc2 rather than on v5.7-rc3 as your > tags/vfio-ccw-20200525. Are there any pre-requisites in between for > vfio-ccw changes? It does cleanly rebase onto v5.7-rc2. There shouldn't be anything. > > Could you please rebase onto v5.7-rc2 or s390/features if that's possible? Ugh. Isn't there any way to avoid doing that?