kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Cc: kvm list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>, Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] kvm: vmx: Add last_cpu to struct vcpu_vmx
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 19:24:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200603022414.GA24364@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALMp9eS3XEVdZ-_pRsevOiKRBSbCr96saicxC+stPfUqsM1u1A@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 10:33:51AM -0700, Jim Mattson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 6:21 PM Sean Christopherson
> <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 03:24:15PM -0700, Jim Mattson wrote:
> > > As we already do in svm, record the last logical processor on which a
> > > vCPU has run, so that it can be communicated to userspace for
> > > potential hardware errors.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 1 +
> > >  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h | 3 +++
> > >  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > > index 170cc76a581f..42856970d3b8 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > > @@ -6730,6 +6730,7 @@ static fastpath_t vmx_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > >       if (vcpu->arch.cr2 != read_cr2())
> > >               write_cr2(vcpu->arch.cr2);
> > >
> > > +     vmx->last_cpu = vcpu->cpu;
> >
> > This is redundant in the EXIT_FASTPATH_REENTER_GUEST case.  Setting it
> > before reenter_guest is technically wrong if emulation_required is true, but
> > that doesn't seem like it'd be an issue in practice.
> 
> I really would like to capture the last logical processor to execute
> VMLAUNCH/VMRESUME (or VMRUN on the AMD side) on behalf of this vCPU.

Does it matter though?  The flows that consume the variable are all directly
in the VM-Exit path.

> > >       vmx->fail = __vmx_vcpu_run(vmx, (unsigned long *)&vcpu->arch.regs,
> > >                                  vmx->loaded_vmcs->launched);
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> > > index 672c28f17e49..8a1e833cf4fb 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> > > @@ -302,6 +302,9 @@ struct vcpu_vmx {
> > >       u64 ept_pointer;
> > >
> > >       struct pt_desc pt_desc;
> > > +
> > > +     /* which host CPU was used for running this vcpu */
> > > +     unsigned int last_cpu;
> >
> > Why not put this in struct kvm_vcpu_arch?  I'd also vote to name it
> > last_run_cpu, as last_cpu is super misleading.
> 
> I think last_run_cpu may also be misleading, since in the cases of
> interest, nothing actually 'ran.' Maybe last_attempted_vmentry_cpu?

Ya, that thought crossed my mind as well.

> > And if it's in arch, what about setting it vcpu_enter_guest?
> 
> As you point out above, this isn't entirely accurate. (But that's the
> way we roll in kvm, isn't it? :-)

As an alternative to storing the last run/attempted CPU, what about moving
the "bad VM-Exit" detection into handle_exit_irqoff, or maybe a new hook
that is called after IRQs are enabled but before preemption is enabled, e.g.
detect_bad_exit or something?  All of the paths in patch 4/4 can easily be
moved out of handle_exit.  VMX would require a little bit of refacotring for
it's "no handler" check, but that should be minor.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-03  2:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-01 22:24 [PATCH v3 0/4] Add logical CPU to KVM_EXIT_FAIL_ENTRY info Jim Mattson
2020-06-01 22:24 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] kvm: svm: Prefer vcpu->cpu to raw_smp_processor_id() Jim Mattson
2020-06-01 22:24 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] kvm: svm: Always set svm->last_cpu on VMRUN Jim Mattson
2020-06-01 22:24 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] kvm: vmx: Add last_cpu to struct vcpu_vmx Jim Mattson
2020-06-02  1:21   ` Sean Christopherson
2020-06-02 17:33     ` Jim Mattson
2020-06-03  2:24       ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2020-06-03 20:18         ` Jim Mattson
2020-06-04 18:46           ` Sean Christopherson
2020-06-04 19:00             ` Jim Mattson
2020-06-04 19:26               ` Sean Christopherson
2020-06-04 20:54                 ` Jim Mattson
2020-06-01 22:24 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] kvm: x86: Add "last CPU" to some KVM_EXIT information Jim Mattson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200603022414.GA24364@linux.intel.com \
    --to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liran.alon@oracle.com \
    --cc=oupton@google.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pshier@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).