From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Rename page_header() to to_shadow_page()
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:20:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200622202034.15093-7-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200622202034.15093-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Rename KVM's accessor for retrieving a 'struct kvm_mmu_page' from the
associated host physical address to better convey what the function is
doing.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c | 6 +++---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index cd1f8017de8a..258334b4e563 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -2208,7 +2208,7 @@ static int __mmu_unsync_walk(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
continue;
}
- child = page_header(ent & PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK);
+ child = to_shadow_page(ent & PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK);
if (child->unsync_children) {
if (mmu_pages_add(pvec, child, i))
@@ -2656,7 +2656,7 @@ static void validate_direct_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
* so we should update the spte at this point to get
* a new sp with the correct access.
*/
- child = page_header(*sptep & PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK);
+ child = to_shadow_page(*sptep & PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK);
if (child->role.access == direct_access)
return;
@@ -2678,7 +2678,7 @@ static bool mmu_page_zap_pte(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
if (is_large_pte(pte))
--kvm->stat.lpages;
} else {
- child = page_header(pte & PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK);
+ child = to_shadow_page(pte & PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK);
drop_parent_pte(child, spte);
}
return true;
@@ -3110,7 +3110,7 @@ static int mmu_set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
struct kvm_mmu_page *child;
u64 pte = *sptep;
- child = page_header(pte & PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK);
+ child = to_shadow_page(pte & PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK);
drop_parent_pte(child, sptep);
flush = true;
} else if (pfn != spte_to_pfn(*sptep)) {
@@ -3615,7 +3615,7 @@ static void mmu_free_root_page(struct kvm *kvm, hpa_t *root_hpa,
if (!VALID_PAGE(*root_hpa))
return;
- sp = page_header(*root_hpa & PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK);
+ sp = to_shadow_page(*root_hpa & PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK);
--sp->root_count;
if (!sp->root_count && sp->role.invalid)
kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page(kvm, sp, invalid_list);
@@ -3845,7 +3845,7 @@ void kvm_mmu_sync_roots(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (vcpu->arch.mmu->root_level >= PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL) {
hpa_t root = vcpu->arch.mmu->root_hpa;
- sp = page_header(root);
+ sp = to_shadow_page(root);
/*
* Even if another CPU was marking the SP as unsync-ed
@@ -3879,7 +3879,7 @@ void kvm_mmu_sync_roots(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (root && VALID_PAGE(root)) {
root &= PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK;
- sp = page_header(root);
+ sp = to_shadow_page(root);
mmu_sync_children(vcpu, sp);
}
}
@@ -4235,8 +4235,8 @@ static inline bool is_root_usable(struct kvm_mmu_root_info *root, gpa_t pgd,
union kvm_mmu_page_role role)
{
return (role.direct || pgd == root->pgd) &&
- VALID_PAGE(root->hpa) && page_header(root->hpa) &&
- role.word == page_header(root->hpa)->role.word;
+ VALID_PAGE(root->hpa) && to_shadow_page(root->hpa) &&
+ role.word == to_shadow_page(root->hpa)->role.word;
}
/*
@@ -4321,7 +4321,7 @@ static void __kvm_mmu_new_pgd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t new_pgd,
*/
vcpu_clear_mmio_info(vcpu, MMIO_GVA_ANY);
- __clear_sp_write_flooding_count(page_header(vcpu->arch.mmu->root_hpa));
+ __clear_sp_write_flooding_count(to_shadow_page(vcpu->arch.mmu->root_hpa));
}
void kvm_mmu_new_pgd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t new_pgd, bool skip_tlb_flush,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c
index 6ba703d3497f..c8d51a37e2ce 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_audit.c
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static void __mmu_spte_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
!is_last_spte(ent[i], level)) {
struct kvm_mmu_page *child;
- child = page_header(ent[i] & PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK);
+ child = to_shadow_page(ent[i] & PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK);
__mmu_spte_walk(vcpu, child, fn, level - 1);
}
}
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ static void mmu_spte_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, inspect_spte_fn fn)
if (vcpu->arch.mmu->root_level >= PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL) {
hpa_t root = vcpu->arch.mmu->root_hpa;
- sp = page_header(root);
+ sp = to_shadow_page(root);
__mmu_spte_walk(vcpu, sp, fn, vcpu->arch.mmu->root_level);
return;
}
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static void mmu_spte_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, inspect_spte_fn fn)
if (root && VALID_PAGE(root)) {
root &= PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK;
- sp = page_header(root);
+ sp = to_shadow_page(root);
__mmu_spte_walk(vcpu, sp, fn, 2);
}
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
index 6371bf1d0b1c..3acf3b8eb469 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ struct kvm_mmu_page {
atomic_t write_flooding_count;
};
-static inline struct kvm_mmu_page *page_header(hpa_t shadow_page)
+static inline struct kvm_mmu_page *to_shadow_page(hpa_t shadow_page)
{
struct page *page = pfn_to_page(shadow_page >> PAGE_SHIFT);
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ static inline struct kvm_mmu_page *page_header(hpa_t shadow_page)
static inline struct kvm_mmu_page *sptep_to_sp(u64 *sptep)
{
- return page_header(__pa(sptep));
+ return to_shadow_page(__pa(sptep));
}
void kvm_mmu_gfn_disallow_lpage(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn);
--
2.26.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-22 20:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-22 20:20 [PATCH 0/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Files and sp helper cleanups Sean Christopherson
2020-06-22 20:20 ` [PATCH 1/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Move mmu_audit.c and mmutrace.h into the mmu/ sub-directory Sean Christopherson
2020-06-22 20:20 ` [PATCH 2/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Move kvm_mmu_available_pages() into mmu.c Sean Christopherson
2020-06-22 20:20 ` [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Add MMU-internal header Sean Christopherson
2020-06-22 20:20 ` [PATCH 4/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Make kvm_mmu_page definition and accessor internal-only Sean Christopherson
2020-06-22 20:20 ` [PATCH 5/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Add sptep_to_sp() helper to wrap shadow page lookup Sean Christopherson
2020-06-22 20:20 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2020-07-03 17:20 ` [PATCH 0/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Files and sp helper cleanups Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200622202034.15093-7-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox