From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: pbonzini@redhat.com
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
david@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com, pmorel@linux.ibm.com,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 02/11] s390x: saving regs for interrupts
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 11:45:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200731094607.15204-3-frankja@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200731094607.15204-1-frankja@linux.ibm.com>
From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
If we use multiple source of interrupts, for example, using SCLP
console to print information while using I/O interrupts, we need
to have a re-entrant register saving interruption handling.
Instead of saving at a static memory address, let's save the base
registers, the floating point registers and the floating point
control register on the stack in case of I/O interrupts
Note that we keep the static register saving to recover from the
RESET tests.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1594887809-10521-2-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
---
s390x/cstart64.S | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/s390x/cstart64.S b/s390x/cstart64.S
index e084f13..4e51150 100644
--- a/s390x/cstart64.S
+++ b/s390x/cstart64.S
@@ -118,6 +118,43 @@ memsetxc:
lmg %r0, %r15, GEN_LC_SW_INT_GRS
.endm
+/* Save registers on the stack (r15), so we can have stacked interrupts. */
+ .macro SAVE_REGS_STACK
+ /* Allocate a stack frame for 15 general registers */
+ slgfi %r15, 15 * 8
+ /* Store registers r0 to r14 on the stack */
+ stmg %r0, %r14, 0(%r15)
+ /* Allocate a stack frame for 16 floating point registers */
+ /* The size of a FP register is the size of an double word */
+ slgfi %r15, 16 * 8
+ /* Save fp register on stack: offset to SP is multiple of reg number */
+ .irp i, 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15
+ std \i, \i * 8(%r15)
+ .endr
+ /* Save fpc, but keep stack aligned on 64bits */
+ slgfi %r15, 8
+ efpc %r0
+ stg %r0, 0(%r15)
+ .endm
+
+/* Restore the register in reverse order */
+ .macro RESTORE_REGS_STACK
+ /* Restore fpc */
+ lfpc 0(%r15)
+ algfi %r15, 8
+ /* Restore fp register from stack: SP still where it was left */
+ /* and offset to SP is a multiple of reg number */
+ .irp i, 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15
+ ld \i, \i * 8(%r15)
+ .endr
+ /* Now that we're done, rewind the stack pointer by 16 double word */
+ algfi %r15, 16 * 8
+ /* Load the registers from stack */
+ lmg %r0, %r14, 0(%r15)
+ /* Rewind the stack by 15 double word */
+ algfi %r15, 15 * 8
+ .endm
+
.section .text
/*
* load_reset calling convention:
@@ -185,9 +222,9 @@ mcck_int:
lpswe GEN_LC_MCCK_OLD_PSW
io_int:
- SAVE_REGS
+ SAVE_REGS_STACK
brasl %r14, handle_io_int
- RESTORE_REGS
+ RESTORE_REGS_STACK
lpswe GEN_LC_IO_OLD_PSW
svc_int:
--
2.25.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-31 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-31 9:45 [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 00/11] s390x patches Janosch Frank
2020-07-31 9:45 ` [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 01/11] s390x/cpumodel: The missing DFP facility on TCG is expected Janosch Frank
2020-07-31 9:45 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2020-07-31 9:45 ` [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 03/11] s390x: I/O interrupt registration Janosch Frank
2020-07-31 9:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 04/11] s390x: export the clock get_clock_ms() utility Janosch Frank
2020-07-31 9:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 05/11] s390x: clock and delays calculations Janosch Frank
2020-07-31 9:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 06/11] s390x: define function to wait for interrupt Janosch Frank
2020-07-31 9:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 07/11] s390x: Library resources for CSS tests Janosch Frank
2020-07-31 9:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 08/11] s390x: css: stsch, enumeration test Janosch Frank
2020-07-31 9:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 09/11] s390x: css: msch, enable test Janosch Frank
2020-07-31 9:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 10/11] s390x: css: ssch/tsch with sense and interrupt Janosch Frank
2020-07-31 9:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 11/11] s390x: fix inline asm on gcc10 Janosch Frank
2020-07-31 10:31 ` [kvm-unit-tests GIT PULL 00/11] s390x patches Paolo Bonzini
2020-07-31 11:31 ` Janosch Frank
2020-07-31 12:09 ` Thomas Huth
2020-07-31 12:31 ` Janosch Frank
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200731094607.15204-3-frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox