From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Cc: Chenyi Qiang <chenyi.qiang@intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
kvm list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] KVM: nVMX: Update VMX controls MSR according to guest CPUID after setting VMX MSRs
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2020 11:16:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200902181654.GH11695@sjchrist-ice> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALMp9eT1makVq46TB-EtTPiz=Z_2DfhudJekrtheSsmwBc4pZA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 01:39:39PM -0700, Jim Mattson wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 1:54 AM Chenyi Qiang <chenyi.qiang@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Update the fields (i.e. VM_{ENTRY_LOAD, EXIT_CLEAR}_BNDCFGS and
> > VM_{ENTRY, EXIT}_LOAD_IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL) in
> > nested MSR_IA32_VMX_TRUE_{ENTRY, EXIT}_CTLS according to guest CPUID
> > when user space initializes the features MSRs. Regardless of the order
> > of SET_CPUID and SET_MSRS from the user space, do the update to avoid
> > MSR values overriding.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chenyi Qiang <chenyi.qiang@intel.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 6 +++++-
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > index 819c185adf09..f9664ccc003b 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > @@ -345,6 +345,7 @@ static bool guest_state_valid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> > static u32 vmx_segment_access_rights(struct kvm_segment *var);
> > static __always_inline void vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(unsigned long *msr_bitmap,
> > u32 msr, int type);
> > +static void nested_vmx_entry_exit_ctls_update(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> >
> > void vmx_vmexit(void);
> >
> > @@ -2161,7 +2162,10 @@ static int vmx_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
> > return 1; /* they are read-only */
> > if (!nested_vmx_allowed(vcpu))
> > return 1;
> > - return vmx_set_vmx_msr(vcpu, msr_index, data);
> > + ret = vmx_set_vmx_msr(vcpu, msr_index, data);
> > + nested_vmx_pmu_entry_exit_ctls_update(vcpu);
> > + nested_vmx_entry_exit_ctls_update(vcpu);
> > + break;
>
> Now I see what you're doing. This commit should probably come before
> the previous commit, so that at no point in the series can userspace
> set VMX MSR bits that should be cleared based on the guest CPUID.
>
> There's an ABI change here: userspace may no longer get -EINVAL if it
> tries to set an illegal VMX MSR bit. Instead, some illegal bits are
> silently cleared. Moreover, these functions will potentially set VMX
> MSR bits that userspace has just asked to clear.
Can we simply remove nested_vmx_entry_exit_ctls_update() and
nested_vmx_pmu_entry_exit_ctls_update()? It's userspace's responsibility
to present a valid vCPU model to the guest, I don't see any reason to
silently tweak the VMX MSRs unless allowing the bogus config breaks KVM.
E.g. there are many more controls that are non-sensical without "native"
support for the associated feature.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-02 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-28 8:56 [PATCH 0/5] Fix nested VMX controls MSRs Chenyi Qiang
2020-08-28 8:56 ` [PATCH 1/5] KVM: nVMX: Fix VMX controls MSRs setup when nested VMX enabled Chenyi Qiang
2020-08-28 17:43 ` Jim Mattson
2020-08-29 1:49 ` Chenyi Qiang
2020-08-29 2:51 ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-08-31 17:36 ` Jim Mattson
2020-09-01 3:27 ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-08-28 8:56 ` [PATCH 2/5] KVM: nVMX: Verify the VMX controls MSRs with the global capability when setting VMX MSRs Chenyi Qiang
2020-08-28 18:23 ` Jim Mattson
2020-08-31 3:15 ` Chenyi Qiang
2020-08-28 8:56 ` [PATCH 3/5] KVM: nVMX: Update VMX controls MSR according to guest CPUID after " Chenyi Qiang
2020-08-28 20:39 ` Jim Mattson
2020-09-02 18:16 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2020-09-02 18:32 ` Jim Mattson
2020-09-11 17:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-08-28 8:56 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: nVMX: Fix the update value of nested load IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL control Chenyi Qiang
2020-08-28 18:29 ` Jim Mattson
2020-08-28 8:56 ` [PATCH 5/5] KVM: nVMX: Simplify the initialization of nested_vmx_msrs Chenyi Qiang
2020-09-11 17:11 ` [PATCH 0/5] Fix nested VMX controls MSRs Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200902181654.GH11695@sjchrist-ice \
--to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=chenyi.qiang@intel.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox