From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: alex.williamson@redhat.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
schnelle@linux.ibm.com, pmorel@linux.ibm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
oohall@gmail.com, cohuck@redhat.com, kevin.tian@intel.com,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] PCI/IOV: Mark VFs as not implementing MSE bit
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 11:41:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200903164117.GA312152@bjorn-Precision-5520> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1599075996-9826-2-git-send-email-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 03:46:34PM -0400, Matthew Rosato wrote:
> Per the PCIe spec, VFs cannot implement the MSE bit
> AKA PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY, and it must be hard-wired to 0.
> Use a dev_flags bit to signify this requirement.
This approach seems sensible to me, but
- This is confusing because while the spec does not use "MSE" to
refer to the Command Register "Memory Space Enable" bit
(PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY), it *does* use "MSE" in the context of the
"VF MSE" bit, which is in the PF SR-IOV Capability. But of
course, you're not talking about that here. Maybe something like
this?
For VFs, the Memory Space Enable bit in the Command Register is
hard-wired to 0.
Add a dev_flags bit to signify devices where the Command
Register Memory Space Enable bit does not control the device's
response to MMIO accesses.
- "PCI_DEV_FLAGS_FORCE_COMMAND_MEM" says something about how you
plan to *use* this, but I'd rather use a term that describes the
hardware, e.g., "PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_COMMAND_MEMORY".
- How do we decide whether to use dev_flags vs a bitfield like
dev->is_virtfn? The latter seems simpler unless there's a reason
to use dev_flags. If there's a reason, maybe we could add a
comment at pci_dev_flags for future reference.
- Wrap the commit log to fill a 75-char line. It's arbitrary, but
that's what I use for consistency.
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/iov.c | 1 +
> include/linux/pci.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/iov.c b/drivers/pci/iov.c
> index b37e08c..2bec77c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/iov.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/iov.c
> @@ -180,6 +180,7 @@ int pci_iov_add_virtfn(struct pci_dev *dev, int id)
> virtfn->device = iov->vf_device;
> virtfn->is_virtfn = 1;
> virtfn->physfn = pci_dev_get(dev);
> + virtfn->dev_flags |= PCI_DEV_FLAGS_FORCE_COMMAND_MEM;
>
> if (id == 0)
> pci_read_vf_config_common(virtfn);
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> index 8355306..9316cce 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -227,6 +227,8 @@ enum pci_dev_flags {
> PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_FLR_RESET = (__force pci_dev_flags_t) (1 << 10),
> /* Don't use Relaxed Ordering for TLPs directed at this device */
> PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING = (__force pci_dev_flags_t) (1 << 11),
> + /* Device does not implement PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY (e.g. a VF) */
> + PCI_DEV_FLAGS_FORCE_COMMAND_MEM = (__force pci_dev_flags_t) (1 << 12),
> };
>
> enum pci_irq_reroute_variant {
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-03 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-02 19:46 [PATCH v4 0/3] vfio/pci: Restore MMIO access for s390 detached VFs Matthew Rosato
2020-09-02 19:46 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] PCI/IOV: Mark VFs as not implementing MSE bit Matthew Rosato
2020-09-03 16:41 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2020-09-03 17:10 ` Matthew Rosato
2020-09-09 23:07 ` Alex Williamson
2020-09-10 0:39 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-09-02 19:46 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] s390/pci: Mark all " Matthew Rosato
2020-09-02 19:46 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] vfio/pci: Decouple MSE bit checks from is_virtfn Matthew Rosato
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200903164117.GA312152@bjorn-Precision-5520 \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=oohall@gmail.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox