From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][v2] KVM: x86/mmu: fix counting of rmap entries in pte_list_add
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 09:43:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200925164332.GA31528@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1600837138-21110-1-git-send-email-lirongqing@baidu.com>
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 12:58:58PM +0800, Li RongQing wrote:
> counting of rmap entries was missed when desc->sptes is full
> and desc->more is NULL
>
> and merging two PTE_LIST_EXT-1 check as one, to avoids the
> extra comparison to give slightly optimization
Please write complete sentences, and use proper capitalization and punctuation.
It's not a big deal for short changelogs, but it's crucial for readability of
larger changelogs.
E.g.
Fix an off-by-one style bug in pte_list_add() where it failed to account
the last full set of SPTEs, i.e. when desc->sptes is full and desc->more
is NULL.
Merge the two "PTE_LIST_EXT-1" checks as part of the fix to avoid an
extra comparison.
> Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
No need to give me credit, I just nitpicked the code, identifying the bug
and the fix was all you. :-)
Thanks for the fix!
> Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
Paolo,
Although it's a bug fix, I don't think this needs a Fixes / Cc:stable. The bug
only results in rmap recycling being delayed by one rmap. Stable kernels can
probably live with an off-by-one bug given that RMAP_RECYCLE_THRESHOLD is
completely arbitrary. :-)
Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
> ---
> diff with v1: merge two check as one
>
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 12 +++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index a5d0207e7189..c4068be6bb3f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -1273,12 +1273,14 @@ static int pte_list_add(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *spte,
> } else {
> rmap_printk("pte_list_add: %p %llx many->many\n", spte, *spte);
> desc = (struct pte_list_desc *)(rmap_head->val & ~1ul);
> - while (desc->sptes[PTE_LIST_EXT-1] && desc->more) {
> - desc = desc->more;
> + while (desc->sptes[PTE_LIST_EXT-1]) {
> count += PTE_LIST_EXT;
> - }
> - if (desc->sptes[PTE_LIST_EXT-1]) {
> - desc->more = mmu_alloc_pte_list_desc(vcpu);
> +
> + if (!desc->more) {
> + desc->more = mmu_alloc_pte_list_desc(vcpu);
> + desc = desc->more;
> + break;
> + }
> desc = desc->more;
> }
> for (i = 0; desc->sptes[i]; ++i)
> --
> 2.16.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-25 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-23 4:58 [PATCH][v2] KVM: x86/mmu: fix counting of rmap entries in pte_list_add Li RongQing
2020-09-25 16:43 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2020-09-26 6:34 ` Li,Rongqing
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200925164332.GA31528@linux.intel.com \
--to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lirongqing@baidu.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox