From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C949C433DB for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 14:52:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7500E22C7E for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 14:52:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2405150AbhAROwj (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jan 2021 09:52:39 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:20440 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2393055AbhAROwD (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jan 2021 09:52:03 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1610981436; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KNt8I2KtS8LBHMYY1pg2KMY7mTlm0B681NVj2CsqEyI=; b=dNyGh/GQit1y0Yv8p067MJrA02CkN4AfsIRz3NQSZDuGBF4tu97++m8i+WHvjIgLM3U8FE xPU4BAMtkJhvGphE7CUsQ6GEeT09+XcVc/PDhDL1gtsieW34LXR0rBu60BwGifLHrpUi/5 H2mSs/PQiEVWQWIIWEHoqd5A02YGixo= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-529-yO4lwVcOOgCKmKKG_aGz-Q-1; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 09:50:32 -0500 X-MC-Unique: yO4lwVcOOgCKmKKG_aGz-Q-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 326BB107ACE6; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 14:50:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-116-34.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.34]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A9E5722C0; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 14:50:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 14:50:16 +0000 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= To: Thomas Huth Cc: Jiaxun Yang , BALATON Zoltan via , Fam Zheng , Laurent Vivier , Viktor Prutyanov , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= , Alistair Francis , Greg Kurz , Wainer dos Santos Moschetta , Max Reitz , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Kevin Wolf , Paolo Bonzini , qemu-block@nongnu.org, Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , David Gibson Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] gitlab-ci: Add alpine to pipeline Message-ID: <20210118145016.GC1799018@redhat.com> Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= References: <20210118063808.12471-1-jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com> <20210118063808.12471-10-jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com> <20210118101159.GC1789637@redhat.com> <307dea8e-148e-6666-c6f1-5cc66a54a7af@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <307dea8e-148e-6666-c6f1-5cc66a54a7af@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.14.6 (2020-07-11) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 03:44:49PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 18/01/2021 14.37, Jiaxun Yang wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021, at 6:11 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 02:38:08PM +0800, Jiaxun Yang wrote: > > > > We only run build test and check-acceptance as their are too many > > > > failures in checks due to minor string mismatch. > > > > > > Can you give real examples of what's broken here, as that sounds > > > rather suspicious, and I'm not convinced it should be ignored. > > > > Mostly Input/Output error vs I/O Error. > > Right, out of curiosity, I also gave it a try: > > https://gitlab.com/huth/qemu/-/jobs/969225330 > > Apart from the "I/O Error" vs. "Input/Output Error" difference, there also > seems to be a problem with "sed" in some of the tests. The "sed" thing sounds like something that ought to be investigated from a portability POV rather than ignored. More worrying is the fact that there's a segv in there too when running qemu-img, which does not give me confidence in use of it with musl. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|