From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
To: Wei Huang <wei.huang2@amd.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
pbonzini@redhat.com, vkuznets@redhat.com, mlevitsk@redhat.com,
seanjc@google.com, joro@8bytes.org, bp@alien8.de,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org,
jmattson@google.com, wanpengli@tencent.com, bsd@redhat.com,
luto@amacapital.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: SVM: Support #GP handling for the case of nested on nested
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 14:56:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210121145622.GH3072@work-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210121065508.1169585-5-wei.huang2@amd.com>
* Wei Huang (wei.huang2@amd.com) wrote:
> Under the case of nested on nested (e.g. L0->L1->L2->L3), #GP triggered
> by SVM instructions can be hided from L1. Instead the hypervisor can
> inject the proper #VMEXIT to inform L1 of what is happening. Thus L1
> can avoid invoking the #GP workaround. For this reason we turns on
> guest VM's X86_FEATURE_SVME_ADDR_CHK bit for KVM running inside VM to
> receive the notification and change behavior.
Doesn't this mean a VM migrated between levels (hmm L2 to L1???) would
see different behaviour?
(I've never tried such a migration, but I thought in principal it should
work).
Dave
> Co-developed-by: Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Huang <wei.huang2@amd.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> index 2a12870ac71a..89512c0e7663 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> @@ -2196,6 +2196,11 @@ static int svm_instr_opcode(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> static int emulate_svm_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int opcode)
> {
> + const int guest_mode_exit_codes[] = {
> + [SVM_INSTR_VMRUN] = SVM_EXIT_VMRUN,
> + [SVM_INSTR_VMLOAD] = SVM_EXIT_VMLOAD,
> + [SVM_INSTR_VMSAVE] = SVM_EXIT_VMSAVE,
> + };
> int (*const svm_instr_handlers[])(struct vcpu_svm *svm) = {
> [SVM_INSTR_VMRUN] = vmrun_interception,
> [SVM_INSTR_VMLOAD] = vmload_interception,
> @@ -2203,7 +2208,14 @@ static int emulate_svm_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int opcode)
> };
> struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
>
> - return svm_instr_handlers[opcode](svm);
> + if (is_guest_mode(vcpu)) {
> + svm->vmcb->control.exit_code = guest_mode_exit_codes[opcode];
> + svm->vmcb->control.exit_info_1 = 0;
> + svm->vmcb->control.exit_info_2 = 0;
> +
> + return nested_svm_vmexit(svm);
> + } else
> + return svm_instr_handlers[opcode](svm);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -4034,6 +4046,11 @@ static void svm_vcpu_after_set_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> /* Check again if INVPCID interception if required */
> svm_check_invpcid(svm);
>
> + if (nested && guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_SVM)) {
> + best = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0x8000000A, 0);
> + best->edx |= (1 << 28);
> + }
> +
> /* For sev guests, the memory encryption bit is not reserved in CR3. */
> if (sev_guest(vcpu->kvm)) {
> best = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0x8000001F, 0);
> --
> 2.27.0
>
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-21 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-21 6:55 [PATCH v2 0/4] Handle #GP for SVM execution instructions Wei Huang
2021-01-21 6:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] KVM: x86: Factor out x86 instruction emulation with decoding Wei Huang
2021-01-21 14:04 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-01-21 14:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-21 15:31 ` Wei Huang
2021-01-21 6:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: SVM: Add emulation support for #GP triggered by SVM instructions Wei Huang
2021-01-21 14:07 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-01-21 16:06 ` Wei Huang
2021-01-21 16:55 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-01-21 22:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-25 13:22 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-01-21 6:55 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: SVM: Add support for VMCB address check change Wei Huang
2021-01-21 14:08 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-01-21 6:55 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: SVM: Support #GP handling for the case of nested on nested Wei Huang
2021-01-21 14:09 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-01-21 14:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-21 14:56 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert [this message]
2021-01-21 15:10 ` Maxim Levitsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210121145622.GH3072@work-vm \
--to=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bsd@redhat.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=wei.huang2@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox