From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Use boolean returns for (S)PTE accessors
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 16:30:03 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210123003003.3137525-1-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
Return a 'bool' instead of an 'int' for various PTE accessors that are
boolean in nature, e.g. is_shadow_present_pte(). Returning an int is
goofy and potentially dangerous, e.g. if a flag being checked is moved
into the upper 32 bits of a SPTE, then the compiler may silently squash
the entire check since casting to an int is guaranteed to yield a
return value of '0'.
Opportunistically refactor is_last_spte() so that it naturally returns
a bool value instead of letting it implicitly cast 0/1 to false/true.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h | 12 ++++--------
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
index 581925e476d6..f61e18dad2f3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static inline int kvm_mmu_do_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t cr2_or_gpa,
*
* TODO: introduce APIs to split these two cases.
*/
-static inline int is_writable_pte(unsigned long pte)
+static inline bool is_writable_pte(unsigned long pte)
{
return pte & PT_WRITABLE_MASK;
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
index 2b3a30bd38b0..398fd1bb13a7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
@@ -185,23 +185,19 @@ static inline bool is_access_track_spte(u64 spte)
return !spte_ad_enabled(spte) && (spte & shadow_acc_track_mask) == 0;
}
-static inline int is_shadow_present_pte(u64 pte)
+static inline bool is_shadow_present_pte(u64 pte)
{
return (pte != 0) && !is_mmio_spte(pte);
}
-static inline int is_large_pte(u64 pte)
+static inline bool is_large_pte(u64 pte)
{
return pte & PT_PAGE_SIZE_MASK;
}
-static inline int is_last_spte(u64 pte, int level)
+static inline bool is_last_spte(u64 pte, int level)
{
- if (level == PG_LEVEL_4K)
- return 1;
- if (is_large_pte(pte))
- return 1;
- return 0;
+ return (level == PG_LEVEL_4K) || is_large_pte(pte);
}
static inline bool is_executable_pte(u64 spte)
--
2.30.0.280.ga3ce27912f-goog
next reply other threads:[~2021-01-23 0:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-23 0:30 Sean Christopherson [this message]
2021-01-25 17:24 ` [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Use boolean returns for (S)PTE accessors Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210123003003.3137525-1-seanjc@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox