From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, david@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com,
imbrenda@linux.ibm.com
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] s390x: Workaround smp stop and store status race
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 09:15:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210209141554.22554-1-frankja@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
KVM and QEMU handle a SIGP stop and store status in two steps:
1) Stop the CPU by injecting a stop request
2) Store when the CPU has left SIE because of the stop request
The problem is that the SIGP order is already considered completed by
KVM/QEMU when step 1 has been performed and not once both have
completed. In addition we currently don't implement the busy CC so a
kernel has no way of knowing that the store has finished other than
checking the location for the store.
This workaround is based on the fact that for a new SIE entry (via the
added smp restart) a stop with the store status has to be finished
first.
Correct handling of this in KVM/QEMU will need some thought and time.
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
---
s390x/smp.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/s390x/smp.c b/s390x/smp.c
index b0ece491..32f284a2 100644
--- a/s390x/smp.c
+++ b/s390x/smp.c
@@ -102,12 +102,15 @@ static void test_stop_store_status(void)
lc->grs_sa[15] = 0;
smp_cpu_stop_store_status(1);
mb();
+ report(smp_cpu_stopped(1), "cpu stopped");
+ /* For the cpu to be started it should have finished storing */
+ smp_cpu_restart(1);
report(lc->prefix_sa == (uint32_t)(uintptr_t)cpu->lowcore, "prefix");
report(lc->grs_sa[15], "stack");
- report(smp_cpu_stopped(1), "cpu stopped");
report_prefix_pop();
report_prefix_push("stopped");
+ smp_cpu_stop(1);
lc->prefix_sa = 0;
lc->grs_sa[15] = 0;
smp_cpu_stop_store_status(1);
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2021-02-09 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-09 14:15 Janosch Frank [this message]
2021-02-09 14:21 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] s390x: Workaround smp stop and store status race Thomas Huth
2021-02-09 16:08 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-02-09 16:14 ` Janosch Frank
2021-02-09 16:19 ` Thomas Huth
2021-02-09 16:42 ` Janosch Frank
2021-02-09 16:55 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210209141554.22554-1-frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox