public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	david@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] s390x: Workaround smp stop and store status race
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 17:08:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210209170804.75d1fc9d@ibm-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210209141554.22554-1-frankja@linux.ibm.com>

On Tue,  9 Feb 2021 09:15:54 -0500
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> KVM and QEMU handle a SIGP stop and store status in two steps:
> 1) Stop the CPU by injecting a stop request
> 2) Store when the CPU has left SIE because of the stop request
> 
> The problem is that the SIGP order is already considered completed by
> KVM/QEMU when step 1 has been performed and not once both have
> completed. In addition we currently don't implement the busy CC so a
> kernel has no way of knowing that the store has finished other than
> checking the location for the store.
> 
> This workaround is based on the fact that for a new SIE entry (via the
> added smp restart) a stop with the store status has to be finished
> first.
> 
> Correct handling of this in KVM/QEMU will need some thought and time.

do I understand correctly that you are here "fixing" the test by not
triggering the KVM bug? Shouldn't we try to trigger as many bugs as
possible instead?

> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  s390x/smp.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/s390x/smp.c b/s390x/smp.c
> index b0ece491..32f284a2 100644
> --- a/s390x/smp.c
> +++ b/s390x/smp.c
> @@ -102,12 +102,15 @@ static void test_stop_store_status(void)
>  	lc->grs_sa[15] = 0;
>  	smp_cpu_stop_store_status(1);
>  	mb();
> +	report(smp_cpu_stopped(1), "cpu stopped");
> +	/* For the cpu to be started it should have finished storing
> */
> +	smp_cpu_restart(1);
>  	report(lc->prefix_sa == (uint32_t)(uintptr_t)cpu->lowcore,
> "prefix"); report(lc->grs_sa[15], "stack");
> -	report(smp_cpu_stopped(1), "cpu stopped");
>  	report_prefix_pop();
>  
>  	report_prefix_push("stopped");
> +	smp_cpu_stop(1);
>  	lc->prefix_sa = 0;
>  	lc->grs_sa[15] = 0;
>  	smp_cpu_stop_store_status(1);


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-09 16:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-09 14:15 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] s390x: Workaround smp stop and store status race Janosch Frank
2021-02-09 14:21 ` Thomas Huth
2021-02-09 16:08 ` Claudio Imbrenda [this message]
2021-02-09 16:14   ` Janosch Frank
2021-02-09 16:19     ` Thomas Huth
2021-02-09 16:42       ` Janosch Frank
2021-02-09 16:55 ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210209170804.75d1fc9d@ibm-vm \
    --to=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox