public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: <cohuck@redhat.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <peterx@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] vfio: Introduce vma ops registration and notifier
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 19:04:04 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210218230404.GD4247@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210218145606.09f08044@omen.home.shazbot.org>

On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 02:56:06PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:

> Looks pretty slick.  I won't claim it's fully gelled in my head yet,
> but AIUI you're creating these inodes on your new pseudo fs and
> associating it via the actual user fd via the f_mapping pointer, which
> allows multiple fds to associate and address space back to this inode
> when you want to call unmap_mapping_range().  

Yes, from what I can tell all the fs/inode stuff is just mandatory
overhead to get a unique address_space pointer, as that is the only
thing this is actually using.

I have to check the mmap flow more carefully, I recall pointing to a
existing race here with Daniel, but the general idea should hold.

> That clarifies from the previous email how we'd store the inode on
> the vfio_device without introducing yet another tracking list for
> device fds.

Right, you can tell from the vma what inode it is for, and the inode
can tell you if it is a VFIO VMA or not, so no tracking lists needed
at all.

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-18 23:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-12 19:27 [PATCH 0/3] vfio: Device memory DMA mapping improvements Alex Williamson
2021-02-12 19:27 ` [PATCH 1/3] vfio: Introduce vma ops registration and notifier Alex Williamson
2021-02-12 21:20   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-02-18  1:12     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-02-18 21:56       ` Alex Williamson
2021-02-18 23:04         ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2021-02-19 22:02           ` Alex Williamson
2021-02-12 19:27 ` [PATCH 2/3] vfio/pci: Implement vm_ops registration Alex Williamson
2021-02-12 19:28 ` [PATCH 3/3] vfio/type1: Implement vma registration and restriction Alex Williamson
2021-02-12 22:47   ` kernel test robot
2021-02-12 20:57 ` [PATCH 0/3] vfio: Device memory DMA mapping improvements Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210218230404.GD4247@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox