public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	pmorel@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 4/7] s390x: Provide preliminary backtrace support
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 14:02:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210304140214.7ff5eae3@ibm-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210222085756.14396-5-frankja@linux.ibm.com>

On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 03:57:53 -0500
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> After the stack changes we can finally use -mbackchain and have a
> working backtrace.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>

Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>

> ---
>  lib/s390x/stack.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
>  s390x/Makefile    |  1 +
>  s390x/macros.S    |  5 +++++
>  3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/stack.c b/lib/s390x/stack.c
> index 0fcd1afb..4cf80dae 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/stack.c
> +++ b/lib/s390x/stack.c
> @@ -3,24 +3,32 @@
>   * s390x stack implementation
>   *
>   * Copyright (c) 2017 Red Hat Inc
> + * Copyright 2021 IBM Corp
>   *
>   * Authors:
>   *  Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>   *  David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> + *  Janosch Frank <frankja@de.ibm.com>
>   */
>  #include <libcflat.h>
>  #include <stack.h>
> +#include <asm/arch_def.h>
>  
>  int backtrace_frame(const void *frame, const void **return_addrs,
> int max_depth) {
> -	printf("TODO: Implement backtrace_frame(%p, %p, %d)
> function!\n",
> -	       frame, return_addrs, max_depth);
> -	return 0;
> +	int depth = 0;
> +	struct stack_frame *stack = (struct stack_frame *)frame;
> +
> +	for (depth = 0; stack && depth < max_depth; depth++) {
> +		return_addrs[depth] = (void *)stack->grs[8];
> +		stack = stack->back_chain;
> +	}
> +
> +	return depth;
>  }
>  
>  int backtrace(const void **return_addrs, int max_depth)
>  {
> -	printf("TODO: Implement backtrace(%p, %d) function!\n",
> -	       return_addrs, max_depth);
> -	return 0;
> +	return backtrace_frame(__builtin_frame_address(0),
> +			       return_addrs, max_depth);
>  }
> diff --git a/s390x/Makefile b/s390x/Makefile
> index f3b0fccf..20bb5683 100644
> --- a/s390x/Makefile
> +++ b/s390x/Makefile
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ CFLAGS += -ffreestanding
>  CFLAGS += -I $(SRCDIR)/lib -I $(SRCDIR)/lib/s390x -I lib
>  CFLAGS += -O2
>  CFLAGS += -march=zEC12
> +CFLAGS += -mbackchain
>  CFLAGS += -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks
>  LDFLAGS += -nostdlib -Wl,--build-id=none
>  
> diff --git a/s390x/macros.S b/s390x/macros.S
> index 11f4397a..d4f41ec4 100644
> --- a/s390x/macros.S
> +++ b/s390x/macros.S
> @@ -22,6 +22,11 @@
>  	lgr     %r2, %r15
>  	/* Allocate stack space for called C function, as specified
> in s390 ELF ABI */ slgfi   %r15, 160
> +	/*
> +	 * Save the address of the interrupt stack into the back
> chain
> +	 * of the called function.
> +	 */
> +	stg     %r2, STACK_FRAME_INT_BACKCHAIN(%r15)
>  	brasl	%r14, \c_func
>  	algfi   %r15, 160
>  	RESTORE_REGS_STACK


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-04 13:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-22  8:57 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 0/7] s390x: Cleanup exception register save/restore and implement backtrace Janosch Frank
2021-02-22  8:57 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 1/7] s390x: Fix fpc store address in RESTORE_REGS_STACK Janosch Frank
2021-02-22  8:57 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 2/7] s390x: Fully commit to stack save area for exceptions Janosch Frank
2021-03-04 11:37   ` Thomas Huth
2021-03-04 15:57     ` Janosch Frank
2021-02-22  8:57 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 3/7] s390x: Introduce and use CALL_INT_HANDLER macro Janosch Frank
2021-03-04 12:58   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-02-22  8:57 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 4/7] s390x: Provide preliminary backtrace support Janosch Frank
2021-03-04 12:23   ` Thomas Huth
2021-03-04 13:02   ` Claudio Imbrenda [this message]
2021-02-22  8:57 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 5/7] s390x: Print more information on program exceptions Janosch Frank
2021-03-04 12:24   ` Thomas Huth
2021-02-22  8:57 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 6/7] s390x: Move diag308_load_reset to stack saving Janosch Frank
2021-03-04 12:26   ` Thomas Huth
2021-02-22  8:57 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 7/7] s390x: Remove SAVE/RESTORE_STACK and lowcore fpc and fprs save areas Janosch Frank
2021-03-04 12:28   ` Thomas Huth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210304140214.7ff5eae3@ibm-vm \
    --to=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox