From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfio: Depend on MMU
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 19:12:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210308191209.6a355b90.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210308105913.6f5f4ac7@omen.home.shazbot.org>
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 10:59:13 -0700
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 09:46:49 +0100
> Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 21:30:03 -0400
> > Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> wrote:
> >
> > > VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1 does not compile with !MMU:
> > >
> > > ../drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c: In function 'follow_fault_pfn':
> > > ../drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c:536:22: error: implicit declaration of function 'pte_write'; did you mean 'vfs_write'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > >
> > > So require it.
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/vfio/Kconfig | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/Kconfig b/drivers/vfio/Kconfig
> > > index 90c0525b1e0cf4..67d0bf4efa1606 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vfio/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/Kconfig
> > > @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ config VFIO_VIRQFD
> > > menuconfig VFIO
> > > tristate "VFIO Non-Privileged userspace driver framework"
> > > select IOMMU_API
> > > - select VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1 if (X86 || S390 || ARM || ARM64)
> > > + select VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1 if MMU && (X86 || S390 || ARM || ARM64)
> > > help
> > > VFIO provides a framework for secure userspace device drivers.
> > > See Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst for more details.
> >
> > Actually, I'm wondering how much sense vfio makes on !MMU at all? (And
> > maybe just merge this with your patch that switches IOMMU_API from a
> > depend to a select, because that is the change that makes the MMU
> > dependency required?)
>
> We do have the no-iommu code in vfio, potentially it's useful for !MMU,
> I guess. It seems a little arbitrary to remove it without a known
> breakage at this point. Thanks,
>
> Alex
Well, in practice, I think we had an implicit dependency on MMU before
(everything selecting IOMMU_API depended on MMU.) If we think !MMU
would be useful for the no-iommu use case, we can certainly restrict
the dependency to VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-08 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-05 1:30 [PATCH] vfio: Depend on MMU Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-05 8:46 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-03-05 23:11 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-08 18:14 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-03-08 18:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-08 17:59 ` Alex Williamson
2021-03-08 18:12 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210308191209.6a355b90.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox