public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfio: Depend on MMU
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 19:14:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210308191421.7f823b28.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210305231141.GS4247@nvidia.com>

On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 19:11:41 -0400
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 09:46:49AM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 21:30:03 -0400
> > Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> wrote:
> >   
> > > VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1 does not compile with !MMU:
> > > 
> > > ../drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c: In function 'follow_fault_pfn':
> > > ../drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c:536:22: error: implicit declaration of function 'pte_write'; did you mean 'vfs_write'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > > 
> > > So require it.
> > > 
> > > Suggested-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> > >  drivers/vfio/Kconfig | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/Kconfig b/drivers/vfio/Kconfig
> > > index 90c0525b1e0cf4..67d0bf4efa1606 100644
> > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/Kconfig
> > > @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ config VFIO_VIRQFD
> > >  menuconfig VFIO
> > >  	tristate "VFIO Non-Privileged userspace driver framework"
> > >  	select IOMMU_API
> > > -	select VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1 if (X86 || S390 || ARM || ARM64)
> > > +	select VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1 if MMU && (X86 || S390 || ARM || ARM64)
> > >  	help
> > >  	  VFIO provides a framework for secure userspace device drivers.
> > >  	  See Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst for more details.  
> > 
> > Actually, I'm wondering how much sense vfio makes on !MMU at all? (And
> > maybe just merge this with your patch that switches IOMMU_API from a
> > depend to a select, because that is the change that makes the MMU
> > dependency required?)  
> 
> Why does changing depend to select affect MMU vs !MMU? Am I missing
> something?
> 
> It looks like IOMMU_API can be turned with ARM !MMU here, for
> instance:
> 
> config MSM_IOMMU
>         bool "MSM IOMMU Support"
>         depends on ARM
>         depends on ARCH_MSM8X60 || ARCH_MSM8960 || COMPILE_TEST
>         select IOMMU_API

But that one is sitting under a menu depending on MMU, isn't it?

> 
> Generally with !MMU I try to ignore it as much as possible unless
> things don't compile, as I have no idea what people use it for :)
> 
> Jason
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-08 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-05  1:30 [PATCH] vfio: Depend on MMU Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-05  8:46 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-03-05 23:11   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-08 18:14     ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2021-03-08 18:23       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-08 17:59   ` Alex Williamson
2021-03-08 18:12     ` Cornelia Huck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210308191421.7f823b28.cohuck@redhat.com \
    --to=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox