From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
To: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, frankja@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com,
thuth@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 5/8] s390x: lib: css: add SCSW ctrl expectations to check I/O completion
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 16:40:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210325164038.62d939f1@ibm-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1616665147-32084-6-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 10:39:04 +0100
Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> When checking for an I/O completion may need to check the cause of
> the interrupt depending on the test case.
>
> Let's provide the tests the possibility to check if the last
> valid IRQ received is for the function expected after executing
> an instruction or sequence of instructions and if all ctrl flags
> of the SCSW are set as expected.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> lib/s390x/css.h | 4 ++--
> lib/s390x/css_lib.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
> s390x/css.c | 4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/css.h b/lib/s390x/css.h
> index 5d1e1f0..1603781 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/css.h
> +++ b/lib/s390x/css.h
> @@ -316,8 +316,8 @@ void css_irq_io(void);
> int css_residual_count(unsigned int schid);
>
> void enable_io_isc(uint8_t isc);
> -int wait_and_check_io_completion(int schid);
> -int check_io_completion(int schid);
> +int wait_and_check_io_completion(int schid, uint32_t ctrl);
> +int check_io_completion(int schid, uint32_t ctrl);
>
> /*
> * CHSC definitions
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/css_lib.c b/lib/s390x/css_lib.c
> index 1e5c409..55e70e6 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/css_lib.c
> +++ b/lib/s390x/css_lib.c
> @@ -488,21 +488,25 @@ struct ccw1 *ccw_alloc(int code, void *data,
> int count, unsigned char flags)
> /* wait_and_check_io_completion:
> * @schid: the subchannel ID
> + * @ctrl : expected SCSW control flags
> */
> -int wait_and_check_io_completion(int schid)
> +int wait_and_check_io_completion(int schid, uint32_t ctrl)
> {
> wait_for_interrupt(PSW_MASK_IO);
> - return check_io_completion(schid);
> + return check_io_completion(schid, ctrl);
> }
>
> /* check_io_completion:
> * @schid: the subchannel ID
> + * @ctrl : expected SCSW control flags
> *
> - * Makes the most common check to validate a successful I/O
> - * completion.
> + * If the ctrl parameter is not null check the IRB SCSW ctrl
I would say "not zero" instead of null, since it's an integer and not a
pointer.
with that fixed:
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
> + * against the ctrl parameter.
> + * Otherwise, makes the most common check to validate a successful
> + * I/O completion.
> * Only report failures.
> */
> -int check_io_completion(int schid)
> +int check_io_completion(int schid, uint32_t ctrl)
> {
> int ret = 0;
>
> @@ -515,6 +519,13 @@ int check_io_completion(int schid)
> goto end;
> }
>
> + if (ctrl && (ctrl ^ irb.scsw.ctrl)) {
> + report_info("%08x : %s", schid,
> dump_scsw_flags(irb.scsw.ctrl));
> + report_info("expected : %s", dump_scsw_flags(ctrl));
> + ret = -1;
> + goto end;
> + }
> +
> /* Verify that device status is valid */
> if (!(irb.scsw.ctrl & SCSW_SC_PENDING)) {
> report(0, "No status pending after interrupt. Subch
> Ctrl: %08x", diff --git a/s390x/css.c b/s390x/css.c
> index 16723f6..57dc340 100644
> --- a/s390x/css.c
> +++ b/s390x/css.c
> @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static void test_sense(void)
> goto error;
> }
>
> - if (wait_and_check_io_completion(test_device_sid) < 0)
> + if (wait_and_check_io_completion(test_device_sid, 0) < 0)
> goto error;
>
> /* Test transfer completion */
> @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static void sense_id(void)
> {
> assert(!start_ccw1_chain(test_device_sid, ccw));
>
> - assert(wait_and_check_io_completion(test_device_sid) >= 0);
> + assert(wait_and_check_io_completion(test_device_sid, 0) >=
> 0); }
>
> static void css_init(void)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-25 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-25 9:38 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 0/8] Testing SSCH, CSCH and HSCH for errors Pierre Morel
2021-03-25 9:39 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 1/8] s390x: lib: css: disabling a subchannel Pierre Morel
2021-03-25 14:52 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-03-25 16:10 ` Pierre Morel
2021-03-26 8:26 ` Janosch Frank
2021-03-26 9:02 ` Pierre Morel
2021-03-29 8:00 ` Thomas Huth
2021-03-29 12:33 ` Pierre Morel
2021-03-25 9:39 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 2/8] s390x: lib: css: SCSW bit definitions Pierre Morel
2021-03-25 15:00 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-03-25 16:13 ` Pierre Morel
2021-03-29 8:09 ` Thomas Huth
2021-03-29 12:25 ` Pierre Morel
2021-03-30 11:49 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-03-30 12:59 ` Pierre Morel
2021-03-25 9:39 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 3/8] s390x: css: simplify skipping tests on no device Pierre Morel
2021-03-25 15:21 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-03-25 16:21 ` Pierre Morel
2021-03-26 8:41 ` Janosch Frank
2021-03-26 9:04 ` Pierre Morel
2021-03-29 8:19 ` Thomas Huth
2021-03-29 12:39 ` Pierre Morel
2021-03-29 12:50 ` Pierre Morel
2021-03-30 11:52 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-03-30 12:58 ` Pierre Morel
2021-03-25 9:39 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 4/8] s390x: lib: css: separate wait for IRQ and check I/O completion Pierre Morel
2021-03-25 15:24 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-03-25 16:23 ` Pierre Morel
2021-03-29 8:21 ` Thomas Huth
2021-03-29 11:00 ` Pierre Morel
2021-03-30 11:57 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-03-30 12:57 ` Pierre Morel
2021-04-01 8:24 ` Pierre Morel
2021-03-25 9:39 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 5/8] s390x: lib: css: add SCSW ctrl expectations to " Pierre Morel
2021-03-25 15:40 ` Claudio Imbrenda [this message]
2021-03-29 8:27 ` Thomas Huth
2021-03-29 8:32 ` Thomas Huth
2021-03-29 11:01 ` Pierre Morel
2021-03-29 11:02 ` Pierre Morel
2021-03-30 12:10 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-03-30 12:54 ` Pierre Morel
2021-03-25 9:39 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 6/8] s390x: css: testing ssch error response Pierre Morel
2021-03-25 16:02 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-03-25 17:23 ` Pierre Morel
2021-03-26 10:41 ` Pierre Morel
2021-03-26 10:58 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-03-29 7:42 ` Pierre Morel
2021-03-30 13:01 ` Pierre Morel
2021-03-29 9:40 ` Pierre Morel
2021-03-25 9:39 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 7/8] s390x: css: testing halt subchannel Pierre Morel
2021-03-25 9:39 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 8/8] s390x: css: testing clear subchannel Pierre Morel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210325164038.62d939f1@ibm-vm \
--to=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox