From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, frankja@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com,
thuth@redhat.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 03/16] s390x: css: simplify skipping tests on no device
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 14:44:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210406144405.09647bb4.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1617694853-6881-4-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
On Tue, 6 Apr 2021 09:40:40 +0200
Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> We will have to test if a device is present for every tests
> in the future.
> Let's provide separate the first tests from the test loop and
> skip the remaining tests if no device is present.
What about the following patch description:
"We keep adding tests that act upon a concrete device, and we have to
test that a device is present for all of those.
Instead, just skip all of the tests requiring a device if we were not
able to set it up in the first place. The enumeration test will already
have failed in that case."
>
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> s390x/css.c | 36 ++++++++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
(...)
> @@ -336,8 +316,6 @@ static struct {
> void (*func)(void);
> } tests[] = {
> /* The css_init test is needed to initialize the CSS Characteristics */
If you remove the css_init test from this list, the above comment does
not make sense anymore :)
> - { "initialize CSS (chsc)", css_init },
> - { "enumerate (stsch)", test_enumerate },
> { "enable (msch)", test_enable },
> { "sense (ssch/tsch)", test_sense },
> { "measurement block (schm)", test_schm },
> @@ -352,11 +330,25 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>
> report_prefix_push("Channel Subsystem");
> enable_io_isc(0x80 >> IO_SCH_ISC);
> +
> + report_prefix_push("initialize CSS (chsc)");
> + css_init();
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +
> + report_prefix_push("enumerate (stsch)");
> + test_enumerate();
> + report_prefix_pop();
Could we maybe have two lists of tests: one that don't require a
device, and one that does?
> +
> + if (!test_device_sid)
> + goto end;
In any case, I think we should log an explicit message that we skip the
remaining tests because of no device being available.
> +
> for (i = 0; tests[i].name; i++) {
> report_prefix_push(tests[i].name);
> tests[i].func();
> report_prefix_pop();
> }
> +
> +end:
> report_prefix_pop();
>
> return report_summary();
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-06 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-06 7:40 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 00/16] s390x: Testing SSCH, CSCH and HSCH for errors Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 01/16] s390x: lib: css: disabling a subchannel Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 02/16] s390x: lib: css: SCSW bit definitions Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 03/16] s390x: css: simplify skipping tests on no device Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 12:44 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2021-04-07 10:53 ` Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 04/16] s390x: lib: css: separate wait for IRQ and check I/O completion Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 05/16] s390x: lib: css: add SCSW ctrl expectations to " Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 06/16] s390x: lib: css: checking I/O errors Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 07/16] s390x: css: testing ssch errors Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 08/16] s390x: css: ssch check for cpa zero Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 09/16] s390x: css: ssch with mis aligned ORB Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 10/16] s390x: css: ssch checking addressing errors Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 11/16] s390x: css: No support for MIDAW Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 15:58 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-04-07 10:06 ` Pierre Morel
2021-04-07 10:14 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-04-06 7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 12/16] s390x: css: Check ORB reserved bits Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 15:51 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-04-07 10:07 ` Pierre Morel
2021-04-07 10:15 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-04-06 7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 13/16] s390x: css: checking for CSS extensions Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 15:50 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-04-07 10:42 ` Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 14/16] s390x: css: issuing SSCH when the channel is status pending Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 15:34 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-04-07 10:46 ` Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 15/16] s390x: css: testing halt subchannel Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 16/16] s390x: css: testing clear subchannel Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 12:21 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 00/16] s390x: Testing SSCH, CSCH and HSCH for errors Pierre Morel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210406144405.09647bb4.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox