From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42686C43461 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:15:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7848610F7 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:15:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1350784AbhDGKPk (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2021 06:15:40 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:20986 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1350765AbhDGKPc (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2021 06:15:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1617790507; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=IHKNxI/KnDrBpIC4c9Oeb/QbZZEcDJOFc5wPyAfiqJI=; b=a1/AC1VIt81dzvnnS8eNUTjYXnf588lJ2HRYMrAyq+sbULG6WhhvFDIm0L3j80TGczgxym PzQzKiHo4kCsw+DQjte7LBIjohoTfzeD9rjToJ35dQv12+jtGl3VJQ2g6VgzT16Aq1O1SG N6byu5jL0T0KIbM2oMCnc/kYtPN8cNQ= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-50-AZoLgi0zMYybey72uAuxMw-1; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 06:15:04 -0400 X-MC-Unique: AZoLgi0zMYybey72uAuxMw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DB69107ACC7; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:15:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gondolin (ovpn-113-88.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.113.88]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6491000324; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:14:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 12:14:56 +0200 From: Cornelia Huck To: Pierre Morel Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, frankja@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 11/16] s390x: css: No support for MIDAW Message-ID: <20210407121456.6a76f82f.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <6112a74d-1536-830c-e665-64f508462f0f@linux.ibm.com> References: <1617694853-6881-1-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> <1617694853-6881-12-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> <20210406175805.304b8abb.cohuck@redhat.com> <6112a74d-1536-830c-e665-64f508462f0f@linux.ibm.com> Organization: Red Hat GmbH MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 12:06:03 +0200 Pierre Morel wrote: > On 4/6/21 5:58 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Tue, 6 Apr 2021 09:40:48 +0200 > > Pierre Morel wrote: > > > >> Verify that using MIDAW triggers a operand exception. > > > > This is only for current QEMU; a future QEMU or another hypervisor may > > support it. I think in those cases the failure mode may be different > > (as the ccw does not use midaws?) > > Yes, should I let fall this test case? I'm not sure how much value it adds, so I'm for dropping it. Any other opinions?