From: Jacob Xu <jacobhxu@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Jacob Xu <jacobhxu@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86: Do not assign values to unaligned pointer to 128 bits
Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 17:48:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210506004847.210466-1-jacobhxu@google.com> (raw)
When compiled with clang, the following statement gets converted into a
movaps instructions.
mem->u[0] = 5; mem->u[1] = 6; mem->u[2] = 7; mem->u[3] = 8;
Since mem is an unaligned pointer to a union of an sse, we get a GP when
running.
All we want is to make the values between mem and v different for this
testcase, so let's just memset the pointer at mem, and convert to
uint8_t pointer. Then the compiler will not assume the pointer is
aligned to 128 bits.
Fixes: e5e76263b5 ("x86: add additional test cases for sse exceptions to
emulator.c")
Signed-off-by: Jacob Xu <jacobhxu@google.com>
---
x86/emulator.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/x86/emulator.c b/x86/emulator.c
index 9705073..672bfda 100644
--- a/x86/emulator.c
+++ b/x86/emulator.c
@@ -716,12 +716,12 @@ static __attribute__((target("sse2"))) void test_sse_exceptions(void *cross_mem)
// test unaligned access for movups, movupd and movaps
v.u[0] = 1; v.u[1] = 2; v.u[2] = 3; v.u[3] = 4;
- mem->u[0] = 5; mem->u[1] = 6; mem->u[2] = 7; mem->u[3] = 8;
+ memset((uint8_t *)mem, 0, 128);
asm("movups %1, %0" : "=m"(*mem) : "x"(v.sse));
report(sseeq(&v, mem), "movups unaligned");
v.u[0] = 1; v.u[1] = 2; v.u[2] = 3; v.u[3] = 4;
- mem->u[0] = 5; mem->u[1] = 6; mem->u[2] = 7; mem->u[3] = 8;
+ memset((uint8_t *)mem, 0, 128);
asm("movupd %1, %0" : "=m"(*mem) : "x"(v.sse));
report(sseeq(&v, mem), "movupd unaligned");
exceptions = 0;
@@ -734,7 +734,7 @@ static __attribute__((target("sse2"))) void test_sse_exceptions(void *cross_mem)
// setup memory for cross page access
mem = (sse_union *)(&bytes[4096-8]);
v.u[0] = 1; v.u[1] = 2; v.u[2] = 3; v.u[3] = 4;
- mem->u[0] = 5; mem->u[1] = 6; mem->u[2] = 7; mem->u[3] = 8;
+ memset((uint8_t *)mem, 0, 128);
asm("movups %1, %0" : "=m"(*mem) : "x"(v.sse));
report(sseeq(&v, mem), "movups unaligned crosspage");
--
2.31.1.527.g47e6f16901-goog
next reply other threads:[~2021-05-06 0:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-06 0:48 Jacob Xu [this message]
2021-05-06 16:01 ` [PATCH] x86: Do not assign values to unaligned pointer to 128 bits Sean Christopherson
2021-05-06 16:40 ` Jim Mattson
2021-05-06 18:50 ` Jacob Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210506004847.210466-1-jacobhxu@google.com \
--to=jacobhxu@google.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox