public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jacob Xu <jacobhxu@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Jacob Xu <jacobhxu@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86: Do not assign values to unaligned pointer to 128 bits
Date: Wed,  5 May 2021 17:48:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210506004847.210466-1-jacobhxu@google.com> (raw)

When compiled with clang, the following statement gets converted into a
movaps instructions.
mem->u[0] = 5; mem->u[1] = 6; mem->u[2] = 7; mem->u[3] = 8;

Since mem is an unaligned pointer to a union of an sse, we get a GP when
running.

All we want is to make the values between mem and v different for this
testcase, so let's just memset the pointer at mem, and convert to
uint8_t pointer. Then the compiler will not assume the pointer is
aligned to 128 bits.

Fixes: e5e76263b5 ("x86: add additional test cases for sse exceptions to
emulator.c")

Signed-off-by: Jacob Xu <jacobhxu@google.com>
---
 x86/emulator.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/x86/emulator.c b/x86/emulator.c
index 9705073..672bfda 100644
--- a/x86/emulator.c
+++ b/x86/emulator.c
@@ -716,12 +716,12 @@ static __attribute__((target("sse2"))) void test_sse_exceptions(void *cross_mem)
 
 	// test unaligned access for movups, movupd and movaps
 	v.u[0] = 1; v.u[1] = 2; v.u[2] = 3; v.u[3] = 4;
-	mem->u[0] = 5; mem->u[1] = 6; mem->u[2] = 7; mem->u[3] = 8;
+	memset((uint8_t *)mem, 0, 128);
 	asm("movups %1, %0" : "=m"(*mem) : "x"(v.sse));
 	report(sseeq(&v, mem), "movups unaligned");
 
 	v.u[0] = 1; v.u[1] = 2; v.u[2] = 3; v.u[3] = 4;
-	mem->u[0] = 5; mem->u[1] = 6; mem->u[2] = 7; mem->u[3] = 8;
+	memset((uint8_t *)mem, 0, 128);
 	asm("movupd %1, %0" : "=m"(*mem) : "x"(v.sse));
 	report(sseeq(&v, mem), "movupd unaligned");
 	exceptions = 0;
@@ -734,7 +734,7 @@ static __attribute__((target("sse2"))) void test_sse_exceptions(void *cross_mem)
 	// setup memory for cross page access
 	mem = (sse_union *)(&bytes[4096-8]);
 	v.u[0] = 1; v.u[1] = 2; v.u[2] = 3; v.u[3] = 4;
-	mem->u[0] = 5; mem->u[1] = 6; mem->u[2] = 7; mem->u[3] = 8;
+	memset((uint8_t *)mem, 0, 128);
 
 	asm("movups %1, %0" : "=m"(*mem) : "x"(v.sse));
 	report(sseeq(&v, mem), "movups unaligned crosspage");
-- 
2.31.1.527.g47e6f16901-goog


             reply	other threads:[~2021-05-06  0:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-06  0:48 Jacob Xu [this message]
2021-05-06 16:01 ` [PATCH] x86: Do not assign values to unaligned pointer to 128 bits Sean Christopherson
2021-05-06 16:40   ` Jim Mattson
2021-05-06 18:50     ` Jacob Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210506004847.210466-1-jacobhxu@google.com \
    --to=jacobhxu@google.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox