From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: cohuck@redhat.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com,
thuth@redhat.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 08/11] KVM: s390: pv: lazy destroy for reboot
Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 22:07:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210517200758.22593-9-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210517200758.22593-1-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Until now, destroying a protected guest was an entirely synchronous
operation that could potentially take a very long time, depending on
the size of the guest, due to the time needed to clean up the address
space from protected pages.
This patch implements a lazy destroy mechanism, that allows a protected
guest to reboot significantly faster than previously.
This is achieved by clearing the pages of the old guest in background.
In case of reboot, the new guest will be able to run in the same
address space almost immediately.
The old protected guest is then only destroyed when all of its memory has
been destroyed or otherwise made non protected.
Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 6 +-
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h | 2 +-
arch/s390/kvm/pv.c | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
3 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index 2f09e9d7dc95..db25aa1fb6a6 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -2248,7 +2248,7 @@ static int kvm_s390_handle_pv(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_pv_cmd *cmd)
r = kvm_s390_cpus_to_pv(kvm, &cmd->rc, &cmd->rrc);
if (r)
- kvm_s390_pv_deinit_vm(kvm, &dummy, &dummy);
+ kvm_s390_pv_deinit_vm_deferred(kvm, &dummy, &dummy);
/* we need to block service interrupts from now on */
set_bit(IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE, &kvm->arch.float_int.masked_irqs);
@@ -2267,7 +2267,7 @@ static int kvm_s390_handle_pv(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_pv_cmd *cmd)
*/
if (r)
break;
- r = kvm_s390_pv_deinit_vm(kvm, &cmd->rc, &cmd->rrc);
+ r = kvm_s390_pv_deinit_vm_deferred(kvm, &cmd->rc, &cmd->rrc);
/* no need to block service interrupts any more */
clear_bit(IRQ_PEND_EXT_SERVICE, &kvm->arch.float_int.masked_irqs);
@@ -2796,7 +2796,7 @@ void kvm_arch_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
* complaining we do not use kvm_s390_pv_is_protected.
*/
if (kvm_s390_pv_get_handle(kvm))
- kvm_s390_pv_deinit_vm(kvm, &rc, &rrc);
+ kvm_s390_pv_deinit_vm_deferred(kvm, &rc, &rrc);
debug_unregister(kvm->arch.dbf);
free_page((unsigned long)kvm->arch.sie_page2);
if (!kvm_is_ucontrol(kvm))
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
index 79dcd647b378..b3c0796a3cc1 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ static inline int kvm_s390_user_cpu_state_ctrl(struct kvm *kvm)
/* implemented in pv.c */
int kvm_s390_pv_destroy_cpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u16 *rc, u16 *rrc);
int kvm_s390_pv_create_cpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u16 *rc, u16 *rrc);
-int kvm_s390_pv_deinit_vm(struct kvm *kvm, u16 *rc, u16 *rrc);
+int kvm_s390_pv_deinit_vm_deferred(struct kvm *kvm, u16 *rc, u16 *rrc);
int kvm_s390_pv_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, u16 *rc, u16 *rrc);
int kvm_s390_pv_set_sec_parms(struct kvm *kvm, void *hdr, u64 length, u16 *rc,
u16 *rrc);
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c b/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
index 59039b8a7be7..9a3547966e18 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
@@ -14,8 +14,17 @@
#include <asm/mman.h>
#include <linux/pagewalk.h>
#include <linux/sched/mm.h>
+#include <linux/kthread.h>
#include "kvm-s390.h"
+struct deferred_priv {
+ struct mm_struct *mm;
+ unsigned long old_table;
+ u64 handle;
+ void *virt;
+ unsigned long real;
+};
+
int kvm_s390_pv_destroy_cpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u16 *rc, u16 *rrc)
{
int cc = 0;
@@ -202,7 +211,7 @@ static int kvm_s390_pv_replace_asce(struct kvm *kvm)
}
/* this should not fail, but if it does, we must not free the donated memory */
-int kvm_s390_pv_deinit_vm(struct kvm *kvm, u16 *rc, u16 *rrc)
+static int kvm_s390_pv_deinit_vm_now(struct kvm *kvm, u16 *rc, u16 *rrc)
{
int cc;
@@ -230,6 +239,111 @@ int kvm_s390_pv_deinit_vm(struct kvm *kvm, u16 *rc, u16 *rrc)
return cc ? -EIO : 0;
}
+static int kvm_s390_pv_destroy_vm_thread(void *priv)
+{
+ struct deferred_priv *p = priv;
+ u16 rc, rrc;
+ int r = 1;
+
+ /* Exit early if we end up being the only users of the mm */
+ s390_uv_destroy_range(p->mm, 1, 0, TASK_SIZE_MAX);
+ mmput(p->mm);
+
+ r = uv_cmd_nodata(p->handle, UVC_CMD_DESTROY_SEC_CONF, &rc, &rrc);
+ WARN_ONCE(r, "protvirt destroy vm failed rc %x rrc %x", rc, rrc);
+ if (r)
+ return r;
+ atomic_dec(&p->mm->context.is_protected);
+
+ /*
+ * Intentional leak in case the destroy secure VM call fails. The
+ * call should never fail if the hardware is not broken.
+ */
+ free_pages(p->real, get_order(uv_info.guest_base_stor_len));
+ free_pages(p->old_table, CRST_ALLOC_ORDER);
+ vfree(p->virt);
+ kfree(p);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int deferred_destroy(struct kvm *kvm, struct deferred_priv *priv, u16 *rc, u16 *rrc)
+{
+ struct task_struct *t;
+
+ priv->virt = kvm->arch.pv.stor_var;
+ priv->real = kvm->arch.pv.stor_base;
+ priv->handle = kvm_s390_pv_get_handle(kvm);
+ priv->old_table = (unsigned long)kvm->arch.gmap->table;
+ WRITE_ONCE(kvm->arch.gmap->guest_handle, 0);
+
+ if (kvm_s390_pv_replace_asce(kvm))
+ goto fail;
+
+ t = kthread_create(kvm_s390_pv_destroy_vm_thread, priv,
+ "kvm_s390_pv_destroy_vm_thread");
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(t))
+ goto fail;
+
+ memset(&kvm->arch.pv, 0, sizeof(kvm->arch.pv));
+ KVM_UV_EVENT(kvm, 3, "PROTVIRT DESTROY VM DEFERRED %d", t->pid);
+ wake_up_process(t);
+ /*
+ * no actual UVC is performed at this point, just return a successful
+ * rc value to make userspace happy, and an arbitrary rrc
+ */
+ *rc = 1;
+ *rrc = 42;
+
+ return 0;
+
+fail:
+ kfree(priv);
+ return kvm_s390_pv_deinit_vm_now(kvm, rc, rrc);
+}
+
+/* Clear the first 2GB of guest memory, to avoid prefix issues after reboot */
+static void kvm_s390_clear_2g(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+ struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
+ struct kvm_memslots *slots;
+ unsigned long lim;
+ int idx;
+
+ idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
+
+ slots = kvm_memslots(kvm);
+ kvm_for_each_memslot(slot, slots) {
+ if (slot->base_gfn >= (SZ_2G / PAGE_SIZE))
+ continue;
+ if (slot->base_gfn + slot->npages > (SZ_2G / PAGE_SIZE))
+ lim = slot->userspace_addr + SZ_2G - slot->base_gfn * PAGE_SIZE;
+ else
+ lim = slot->userspace_addr + slot->npages * PAGE_SIZE;
+ s390_uv_destroy_range(kvm->mm, 1, slot->userspace_addr, lim);
+ }
+
+ srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
+}
+
+int kvm_s390_pv_deinit_vm_deferred(struct kvm *kvm, u16 *rc, u16 *rrc)
+{
+ struct deferred_priv *priv;
+
+ priv = kmalloc(sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
+ if (!priv)
+ return kvm_s390_pv_deinit_vm_now(kvm, rc, rrc);
+
+ if (mmget_not_zero(kvm->mm)) {
+ kvm_s390_clear_2g(kvm);
+ } else {
+ /* No deferred work to do */
+ kfree(priv);
+ return kvm_s390_pv_deinit_vm_now(kvm, rc, rrc);
+ }
+ priv->mm = kvm->mm;
+ return deferred_destroy(kvm, priv, rc, rrc);
+}
+
int kvm_s390_pv_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, u16 *rc, u16 *rrc)
{
struct uv_cb_cgc uvcb = {
@@ -263,7 +377,7 @@ int kvm_s390_pv_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, u16 *rc, u16 *rrc)
atomic_inc(&kvm->mm->context.is_protected);
if (cc) {
if (uvcb.header.rc & UVC_RC_NEED_DESTROY) {
- kvm_s390_pv_deinit_vm(kvm, &dummy, &dummy);
+ kvm_s390_pv_deinit_vm_now(kvm, &dummy, &dummy);
} else {
atomic_dec(&kvm->mm->context.is_protected);
kvm_s390_pv_dealloc_vm(kvm);
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-17 20:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-17 20:07 [PATCH v1 00/11] KVM: s390: pv: implement lazy destroy Claudio Imbrenda
2021-05-17 20:07 ` [PATCH v1 01/11] KVM: s390: pv: leak the ASCE page when destroy fails Claudio Imbrenda
2021-05-18 10:26 ` Janosch Frank
2021-05-18 10:40 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-05-18 12:00 ` Janosch Frank
2021-05-17 20:07 ` [PATCH v1 02/11] KVM: s390: pv: properly handle page flags for protected guests Claudio Imbrenda
2021-05-17 20:07 ` [PATCH v1 03/11] KVM: s390: pv: handle secure storage violations " Claudio Imbrenda
2021-05-17 20:07 ` [PATCH v1 04/11] KVM: s390: pv: handle secure storage exceptions for normal guests Claudio Imbrenda
2021-05-17 20:07 ` [PATCH v1 05/11] KVM: s390: pv: refactor s390_reset_acc Claudio Imbrenda
2021-05-26 12:11 ` Janosch Frank
2021-05-17 20:07 ` [PATCH v1 06/11] KVM: s390: pv: usage counter instead of flag Claudio Imbrenda
2021-05-27 9:29 ` Janosch Frank
2021-05-17 20:07 ` [PATCH v1 07/11] KVM: s390: pv: add export before import Claudio Imbrenda
2021-05-26 11:56 ` Janosch Frank
2021-05-17 20:07 ` Claudio Imbrenda [this message]
2021-05-27 9:43 ` [PATCH v1 08/11] KVM: s390: pv: lazy destroy for reboot Janosch Frank
2021-05-17 20:07 ` [PATCH v1 09/11] KVM: s390: pv: extend lazy destroy to handle shutdown Claudio Imbrenda
2021-05-17 20:07 ` [PATCH v1 10/11] KVM: s390: pv: module parameter to fence lazy destroy Claudio Imbrenda
2021-05-27 10:35 ` Janosch Frank
2021-05-17 20:07 ` [PATCH v1 11/11] KVM: s390: pv: add support for UV feature bits Claudio Imbrenda
2021-05-18 15:05 ` [PATCH v1 00/11] KVM: s390: pv: implement lazy destroy Cornelia Huck
2021-05-18 15:36 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-05-18 15:45 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-05-18 15:52 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-05-18 16:13 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-05-18 16:20 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-05-18 16:34 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-05-18 16:35 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-05-18 16:04 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-05-18 16:19 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-05-18 16:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-18 16:31 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-05-18 16:55 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-05-18 17:00 ` Claudio Imbrenda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210517200758.22593-9-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--to=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox