From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
david@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/4] s390x: sie: Add sie lib validity handling
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 16:11:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210729161108.47c63bcd@p-imbrenda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210729134803.183358-2-frankja@linux.ibm.com>
On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 13:48:00 +0000
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> Let's start off the SIE lib with validity handling code since that has
> the least amount of dependencies to other files.
>
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> lib/s390x/sie.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> lib/s390x/sie.h | 3 +++
> s390x/Makefile | 1 +
> s390x/mvpg-sie.c | 2 +-
> s390x/sie.c | 7 +------
> 5 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 lib/s390x/sie.c
>
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/sie.c b/lib/s390x/sie.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..9107519f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/lib/s390x/sie.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +/*
> + * Virtualization library that speeds up managing guests.
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2021 IBM Corp
> + *
> + * Authors:
> + * Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <asm/barrier.h>
> +#include <libcflat.h>
> +#include <sie.h>
> +
> +static bool validity_expected;
> +static uint16_t vir;
> +
> +void sie_expect_validity(void)
> +{
> + validity_expected = true;
> + vir = 0;
> +}
> +
> +void sie_check_validity(uint16_t vir_exp)
> +{
> + report(vir_exp == vir, "VALIDITY: %x", vir);
> + mb();
why the barrier?
> + vir = 0;
> +}
> +
> +void sie_handle_validity(struct vm *vm)
> +{
> + if (vm->sblk->icptcode != ICPT_VALIDITY)
> + return;
> +
> + vir = vm->sblk->ipb >> 16;
> +
> + if (!validity_expected)
> + report_abort("VALIDITY: %x", vir);
> + validity_expected = false;
> +}
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/sie.h b/lib/s390x/sie.h
> index 6ba858a2..7ff98d2d 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/sie.h
> +++ b/lib/s390x/sie.h
> @@ -197,5 +197,8 @@ struct vm {
> extern void sie_entry(void);
> extern void sie_exit(void);
> extern void sie64a(struct kvm_s390_sie_block *sblk, struct
> vm_save_area *save_area); +void sie_expect_validity(void);
> +void sie_check_validity(uint16_t vir_exp);
> +void sie_handle_validity(struct vm *vm);
>
> #endif /* _S390X_SIE_H_ */
> diff --git a/s390x/Makefile b/s390x/Makefile
> index 6565561b..ef8041a6 100644
> --- a/s390x/Makefile
> +++ b/s390x/Makefile
> @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ cflatobjs += lib/s390x/css_dump.o
> cflatobjs += lib/s390x/css_lib.o
> cflatobjs += lib/s390x/malloc_io.o
> cflatobjs += lib/s390x/uv.o
> +cflatobjs += lib/s390x/sie.o
>
> OBJDIRS += lib/s390x
>
> diff --git a/s390x/mvpg-sie.c b/s390x/mvpg-sie.c
> index 5e70f591..2ac91eec 100644
> --- a/s390x/mvpg-sie.c
> +++ b/s390x/mvpg-sie.c
> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ static void sie(struct vm *vm)
>
> while (vm->sblk->icptcode == 0) {
> sie64a(vm->sblk, &vm->save_area);
> - assert(vm->sblk->icptcode != ICPT_VALIDITY);
> + sie_handle_validity(vm);
> }
> vm->save_area.guest.grs[14] = vm->sblk->gg14;
> vm->save_area.guest.grs[15] = vm->sblk->gg15;
> diff --git a/s390x/sie.c b/s390x/sie.c
> index 134d3c4f..5c798a9e 100644
> --- a/s390x/sie.c
> +++ b/s390x/sie.c
> @@ -24,17 +24,12 @@ static u8 *guest;
> static u8 *guest_instr;
> static struct vm vm;
>
> -static void handle_validity(struct vm *vm)
> -{
> - report(0, "VALIDITY: %x", vm->sblk->ipb >> 16);
> -}
>
> static void sie(struct vm *vm)
> {
> while (vm->sblk->icptcode == 0) {
> sie64a(vm->sblk, &vm->save_area);
> - if (vm->sblk->icptcode == ICPT_VALIDITY)
> - handle_validity(vm);
> + sie_handle_validity(vm);
> }
> vm->save_area.guest.grs[14] = vm->sblk->gg14;
> vm->save_area.guest.grs[15] = vm->sblk->gg15;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-29 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-29 13:47 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/4] s390x: SIE cleanup 2 Janosch Frank
2021-07-29 13:48 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/4] s390x: sie: Add sie lib validity handling Janosch Frank
2021-07-29 14:11 ` Claudio Imbrenda [this message]
2021-07-29 14:33 ` Janosch Frank
2021-07-29 14:42 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-07-30 14:45 ` Thomas Huth
2021-08-03 13:47 ` Janosch Frank
2021-08-03 13:57 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2] " Janosch Frank
2021-08-03 14:47 ` Thomas Huth
2021-07-29 13:48 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/4] s390x: lib: Introduce HPAGE_* constants Janosch Frank
2021-07-29 14:11 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-07-30 14:46 ` Thomas Huth
2021-07-29 13:48 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 3/4] s390x: lib: sie: Add struct vm (de)initialization functions Janosch Frank
2021-07-29 14:21 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-07-29 14:32 ` Janosch Frank
2021-07-30 14:52 ` Thomas Huth
2021-07-29 13:48 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 4/4] lib: s390x: sie: Move sie function into library Janosch Frank
2021-07-29 14:23 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-07-30 14:54 ` Thomas Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210729161108.47c63bcd@p-imbrenda \
--to=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox