From: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/3] KVM: x86/mmu: Avoid collision with !PRESENT SPTEs in TDP MMU lpage stats
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 21:46:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210803044607.599629-3-mizhang@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210803044607.599629-1-mizhang@google.com>
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Factor in whether or not the old/new SPTEs are shadow-present when
adjusting the large page stats in the TDP MMU. A modified MMIO SPTE can
toggle the page size bit, as bit 7 is used to store the MMIO generation,
i.e. is_large_pte() can get a false positive when called on a MMIO SPTE.
Ditto for nuking SPTEs with REMOVED_SPTE, which sets bit 7 in its magic
value.
Opportunistically move the logic below the check to verify at least one
of the old/new SPTEs is shadow present.
Use is/was_leaf even though is/was_present would suffice. The code
generation is roughly equivalent since all flags need to be computed
prior to the code in question, and using the *_leaf flags will minimize
the diff in a future enhancement to account all pages, i.e. will change
the check to "is_leaf != was_leaf".
Reviewed-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Fixes: 1699f65c8b65 ("kvm/x86: Fix 'lpages' kvm stat for TDM MMU")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index 43f12f5d12c0..4b0953fed12e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -413,6 +413,7 @@ static void __handle_changed_spte(struct kvm *kvm, int as_id, gfn_t gfn,
bool was_leaf = was_present && is_last_spte(old_spte, level);
bool is_leaf = is_present && is_last_spte(new_spte, level);
bool pfn_changed = spte_to_pfn(old_spte) != spte_to_pfn(new_spte);
+ bool was_large, is_large;
WARN_ON(level > PT64_ROOT_MAX_LEVEL);
WARN_ON(level < PG_LEVEL_4K);
@@ -446,13 +447,6 @@ static void __handle_changed_spte(struct kvm *kvm, int as_id, gfn_t gfn,
trace_kvm_tdp_mmu_spte_changed(as_id, gfn, level, old_spte, new_spte);
- if (is_large_pte(old_spte) != is_large_pte(new_spte)) {
- if (is_large_pte(old_spte))
- atomic64_sub(1, (atomic64_t*)&kvm->stat.lpages);
- else
- atomic64_add(1, (atomic64_t*)&kvm->stat.lpages);
- }
-
/*
* The only times a SPTE should be changed from a non-present to
* non-present state is when an MMIO entry is installed/modified/
@@ -478,6 +472,18 @@ static void __handle_changed_spte(struct kvm *kvm, int as_id, gfn_t gfn,
return;
}
+ /*
+ * Update large page stats if a large page is being zapped, created, or
+ * is replacing an existing shadow page.
+ */
+ was_large = was_leaf && is_large_pte(old_spte);
+ is_large = is_leaf && is_large_pte(new_spte);
+ if (was_large != is_large) {
+ if (was_large)
+ atomic64_sub(1, (atomic64_t *)&kvm->stat.lpages);
+ else
+ atomic64_add(1, (atomic64_t *)&kvm->stat.lpages);
+ }
if (was_leaf && is_dirty_spte(old_spte) &&
(!is_present || !is_dirty_spte(new_spte) || pfn_changed))
--
2.32.0.554.ge1b32706d8-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-03 4:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-03 4:46 [PATCH v4 0/3] Add detailed page size stats in KVM stats Mingwei Zhang
2021-08-03 4:46 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] KVM: x86/mmu: Remove redundant spte present check in mmu_set_spte Mingwei Zhang
2021-08-03 4:46 ` Mingwei Zhang [this message]
2021-08-03 4:46 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] KVM: x86/mmu: Add detailed page size stats Mingwei Zhang
2021-08-09 22:26 ` Jim Mattson
2021-08-09 23:39 ` Mingwei Zhang
2021-08-10 0:01 ` Mingwei Zhang
2021-08-10 23:22 ` Peter Xu
2021-08-11 1:06 ` Mingwei Zhang
2021-08-11 13:12 ` Peter Xu
2021-08-12 17:44 ` Mingwei Zhang
2021-08-11 11:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210803044607.599629-3-mizhang@google.com \
--to=mizhang@google.com \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=jingzhangos@google.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox