From: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
Raghavendra Rao Anata <rananta@google.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v8 3/7] KVM: x86: Fix potential race in KVM_GET_CLOCK
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 18:15:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210916181538.968978-4-oupton@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210916181538.968978-1-oupton@google.com>
Sean noticed that KVM_GET_CLOCK was checking kvm_arch.use_master_clock
outside of the pvclock sync lock. This is problematic, as the clock
value written to the user may or may not actually correspond to a stable
TSC.
Fix the race by populating the entire kvm_clock_data structure behind
the pvclock_gtod_sync_lock.
Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index c910cf31958f..523c4e5c109f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -2793,19 +2793,20 @@ static void kvm_update_masterclock(struct kvm *kvm)
kvm_end_pvclock_update(kvm);
}
-u64 get_kvmclock_ns(struct kvm *kvm)
+static void get_kvmclock(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_clock_data *data)
{
struct kvm_arch *ka = &kvm->arch;
struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info hv_clock;
unsigned long flags;
- u64 ret;
spin_lock_irqsave(&ka->pvclock_gtod_sync_lock, flags);
if (!ka->use_master_clock) {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ka->pvclock_gtod_sync_lock, flags);
- return get_kvmclock_base_ns() + ka->kvmclock_offset;
+ data->clock = get_kvmclock_base_ns() + ka->kvmclock_offset;
+ return;
}
+ data->flags |= KVM_CLOCK_TSC_STABLE;
hv_clock.tsc_timestamp = ka->master_cycle_now;
hv_clock.system_time = ka->master_kernel_ns + ka->kvmclock_offset;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ka->pvclock_gtod_sync_lock, flags);
@@ -2817,13 +2818,26 @@ u64 get_kvmclock_ns(struct kvm *kvm)
kvm_get_time_scale(NSEC_PER_SEC, __this_cpu_read(cpu_tsc_khz) * 1000LL,
&hv_clock.tsc_shift,
&hv_clock.tsc_to_system_mul);
- ret = __pvclock_read_cycles(&hv_clock, rdtsc());
- } else
- ret = get_kvmclock_base_ns() + ka->kvmclock_offset;
+ data->clock = __pvclock_read_cycles(&hv_clock, rdtsc());
+ } else {
+ data->clock = get_kvmclock_base_ns() + ka->kvmclock_offset;
+ }
put_cpu();
+}
- return ret;
+u64 get_kvmclock_ns(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+ struct kvm_clock_data data;
+
+ /*
+ * Zero flags as it's accessed RMW, leave everything else uninitialized
+ * as clock is always written and no other fields are consumed.
+ */
+ data.flags = 0;
+
+ get_kvmclock(kvm, &data);
+ return data.clock;
}
static void kvm_setup_pvclock_page(struct kvm_vcpu *v,
@@ -5832,13 +5846,9 @@ int kvm_arch_pm_notifier(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long state)
static int kvm_vm_ioctl_get_clock(struct kvm *kvm, void __user *argp)
{
struct kvm_clock_data data;
- u64 now_ns;
-
- now_ns = get_kvmclock_ns(kvm);
- user_ns.clock = now_ns;
- user_ns.flags = kvm->arch.use_master_clock ? KVM_CLOCK_TSC_STABLE : 0;
- memset(&user_ns.pad, 0, sizeof(user_ns.pad));
+ memset(&data, 0, sizeof(data));
+ get_kvmclock(kvm, &data);
if (copy_to_user(argp, &data, sizeof(data)))
return -EFAULT;
--
2.33.0.309.g3052b89438-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-16 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-16 18:15 [PATCH v8 0/7] KVM: x86: Add idempotent controls for migrating system counter state Oliver Upton
2021-09-16 18:15 ` [PATCH v8 1/7] kvm: x86: abstract locking around pvclock_update_vm_gtod_copy Oliver Upton
2021-09-16 18:15 ` [PATCH v8 2/7] KVM: x86: extract KVM_GET_CLOCK/KVM_SET_CLOCK to separate functions Oliver Upton
2021-09-16 18:15 ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2021-09-29 13:33 ` [PATCH v8 3/7] KVM: x86: Fix potential race in KVM_GET_CLOCK Marcelo Tosatti
2021-09-16 18:15 ` [PATCH v8 4/7] KVM: x86: Report host tsc and realtime values " Oliver Upton
2021-09-28 18:53 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-09-29 11:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-29 18:56 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-09-30 19:21 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-09-30 23:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-01 12:05 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-10-01 12:10 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-10-01 19:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-01 21:03 ` Oliver Upton
2021-10-01 14:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-01 14:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-01 14:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-01 15:39 ` Oliver Upton
2021-10-01 16:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-01-17 14:28 ` David Woodhouse
2024-07-24 22:24 ` [PATCH v8 4/7] KVM: x86: Report host tsc and realtime values in KVM_GET_CLOCK' Sean Christopherson
2024-07-25 8:24 ` David Woodhouse
2021-09-16 18:15 ` [PATCH v8 5/7] kvm: x86: protect masterclock with a seqcount Oliver Upton
2021-09-24 16:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-30 17:51 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-10-01 16:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-16 18:15 ` [PATCH v8 6/7] KVM: x86: Refactor tsc synchronization code Oliver Upton
2021-09-16 18:15 ` [PATCH v8 7/7] KVM: x86: Expose TSC offset controls to userspace Oliver Upton
2021-09-30 19:14 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-10-01 9:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-01 10:32 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-10-01 15:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-01 19:11 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-10-01 19:33 ` Oliver Upton
2021-10-04 14:30 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-10-04 11:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-05 15:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-23 10:02 ` David Woodhouse
2021-09-24 16:43 ` [PATCH v8 0/7] KVM: x86: Add idempotent controls for migrating system counter state Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210916181538.968978-4-oupton@google.com \
--to=oupton@google.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jingzhangos@google.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pshier@google.com \
--cc=rananta@google.com \
--cc=ricarkol@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox