From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH V2 09/10] KVM: X86: Don't unsync pagetables when speculative
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2021 08:56:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210918005636.3675-10-jiangshanlai@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210918005636.3675-1-jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>
We'd better only unsync the pagetable when there just was a really
write fault on a level-1 pagetable.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 6 +++++-
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h | 3 ++-
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index ff52e8354148..e3213d804647 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -2577,7 +2577,8 @@ static void kvm_unsync_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
* were marked unsync (or if there is no shadow page), -EPERM if the SPTE must
* be write-protected.
*/
-int mmu_try_to_unsync_pages(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn, bool can_unsync)
+int mmu_try_to_unsync_pages(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn, bool can_unsync,
+ bool speculative)
{
struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
bool locked = false;
@@ -2603,6 +2604,9 @@ int mmu_try_to_unsync_pages(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn, bool can_unsync)
if (sp->unsync)
continue;
+ if (speculative)
+ return -EEXIST;
+
/*
* TDP MMU page faults require an additional spinlock as they
* run with mmu_lock held for read, not write, and the unsync
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
index 658d8d228d43..f5d8be787993 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h
@@ -116,7 +116,8 @@ static inline bool kvm_vcpu_ad_need_write_protect(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
kvm_x86_ops.cpu_dirty_log_size;
}
-int mmu_try_to_unsync_pages(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn, bool can_unsync);
+int mmu_try_to_unsync_pages(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn, bool can_unsync,
+ bool speculative);
void kvm_mmu_gfn_disallow_lpage(const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn);
void kvm_mmu_gfn_allow_lpage(const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
index 3e97cdb13eb7..b68a580f3510 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ int make_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int pte_access, int level,
* e.g. it's write-tracked (upper-level SPs) or has one or more
* shadow pages and unsync'ing pages is not allowed.
*/
- if (mmu_try_to_unsync_pages(vcpu, gfn, can_unsync)) {
+ if (mmu_try_to_unsync_pages(vcpu, gfn, can_unsync, speculative)) {
pgprintk("%s: found shadow page for %llx, marking ro\n",
__func__, gfn);
ret |= SET_SPTE_WRITE_PROTECTED_PT;
--
2.19.1.6.gb485710b
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-18 0:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20210918005636.3675-1-jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
2021-09-18 0:56 ` [PATCH V2 01/10] KVM: X86: Fix missed remote tlb flush in rmap_write_protect() Lai Jiangshan
2021-09-18 0:56 ` [PATCH V2 02/10] KVM: X86: Synchronize the shadow pagetable before link it Lai Jiangshan
2021-09-23 14:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-18 0:56 ` [PATCH V2 03/10] KVM: Remove tlbs_dirty Lai Jiangshan
2021-09-23 15:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-24 15:40 ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-09-24 16:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-18 0:56 ` [PATCH V2 04/10] KVM: X86: Don't flush current tlb on shadow page modification Lai Jiangshan
2021-09-18 0:56 ` [PATCH V2 05/10] KVM: X86: Remove kvm_mmu_flush_or_zap() Lai Jiangshan
2021-09-18 0:56 ` [PATCH V2 06/10] KVM: X86: Change kvm_sync_page() to return true when remote flush is needed Lai Jiangshan
2021-09-18 0:56 ` [PATCH V2 07/10] KVM: X86: Zap the invalid list after remote tlb flushing Lai Jiangshan
2021-09-18 0:56 ` [PATCH V2 08/10] KVM: X86: Remove FNAME(update_pte) Lai Jiangshan
2021-09-18 1:49 ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-09-18 0:56 ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2021-09-18 0:56 ` [PATCH V2 10/10] KVM: X86: Don't check unsync if the original spte is writible Lai Jiangshan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210918005636.3675-10-jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--to=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=laijs@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox