[kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/9] s390x: uv: Tolerate 0x100 query return code

[Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>]

RC 0x100 is not an error but a notice that we could have gotten more
data from the Ultravisor if we had asked for it. So let's tolerate
them in our tests.

Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
---
 s390x/uv-guest.c | 4 ++--
 s390x/uv-host.c  | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/s390x/uv-guest.c b/s390x/uv-guest.c
index f05ae4c3..e7446e03 100644
--- a/s390x/uv-guest.c
+++ b/s390x/uv-guest.c
@@ -70,8 +70,8 @@ static void test_query(void)
 	report(cc == 1 && uvcb.header.rc == UVC_RC_INV_LEN, "length");
 
 	uvcb.header.len = sizeof(uvcb);
-	cc = uv_call(0, (u64)&uvcb);
-	report(cc == 0 && uvcb.header.rc == UVC_RC_EXECUTED, "successful query");
+	uv_call(0, (u64)&uvcb);
+	report(uvcb.header.rc == UVC_RC_EXECUTED || uvcb.header.rc == 0x100, "successful query");
 
 	/*
 	 * These bits have been introduced with the very first
diff --git a/s390x/uv-host.c b/s390x/uv-host.c
index 28035707..66a11160 100644
--- a/s390x/uv-host.c
+++ b/s390x/uv-host.c
@@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ static void test_query(void)
 
 	uvcb_qui.header.len = sizeof(uvcb_qui);
 	uv_call(0, (uint64_t)&uvcb_qui);
-	report(uvcb_qui.header.rc == UVC_RC_EXECUTED, "successful query");
+	report(uvcb_qui.header.rc == UVC_RC_EXECUTED || uvcb_qui.header.rc == 0x100, "successful query");
 
 	for (i = 0; cmds[i].name; i++)
 		report(uv_query_test_call(cmds[i].call_bit), "%s", cmds[i].name);
-- 
2.30.2