public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, thuth@redhat.com, david@redhat.com,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, seiden@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 8/9] s390x: Add sthyi cc==0 r2+1 verification
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 11:31:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210922113152.2489e72a@p-imbrenda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210922071811.1913-9-frankja@linux.ibm.com>

On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 07:18:10 +0000
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> On success r2 + 1 should be 0, let's also check for that.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>

Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>

but see comment below

> ---
>  s390x/sthyi.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/s390x/sthyi.c b/s390x/sthyi.c
> index db90b56f..4b153bf4 100644
> --- a/s390x/sthyi.c
> +++ b/s390x/sthyi.c
> @@ -24,16 +24,16 @@ static inline int sthyi(uint64_t vaddr, uint64_t fcode, uint64_t *rc,
>  {
>  	register uint64_t code asm("0") = fcode;
>  	register uint64_t addr asm("2") = vaddr;
> -	register uint64_t rc3 asm("3") = 0;
> +	register uint64_t rc3 asm("3") = 42;

I am not a big fan of the asm constraints, in the kernel we are
trying to move away from them, but I guess as long as it works it's ok

>  	int cc = 0;
>  
> -	asm volatile(".insn rre,0xB2560000,%[r1],%[r2]\n"
> -		     "ipm	 %[cc]\n"
> -		     "srl	 %[cc],28\n"
> -		     : [cc] "=d" (cc)
> -		     : [code] "d" (code), [addr] "a" (addr), [r1] "i" (r1),
> -		       [r2] "i" (r2)
> -		     : "memory", "cc", "r3");
> +	asm volatile(
> +		".insn   rre,0xB2560000,%[r1],%[r2]\n"
> +		"ipm     %[cc]\n"
> +		"srl     %[cc],28\n"
> +		: [cc] "=d" (cc), "+d" (rc3)
> +		: [code] "d" (code), [addr] "a" (addr), [r1] "i" (r1), [r2] "i" (r2)
> +		: "memory", "cc");
>  	if (rc)
>  		*rc = rc3;
>  	return cc;
> @@ -139,16 +139,18 @@ static void test_fcode0(void)
>  	struct sthyi_hdr_sctn *hdr;
>  	struct sthyi_mach_sctn *mach;
>  	struct sthyi_par_sctn *par;
> +	uint64_t rc = 42;
>  
>  	/* Zero destination memory. */
>  	memset(pagebuf, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
>  
>  	report_prefix_push("fcode 0");
> -	sthyi((uint64_t)pagebuf, 0, NULL, 0, 2);
> +	sthyi((uint64_t)pagebuf, 0, &rc, 0, 2);
>  	hdr = (void *)pagebuf;
>  	mach = (void *)pagebuf + hdr->INFMOFF;
>  	par = (void *)pagebuf + hdr->INFPOFF;
>  
> +	report(!rc, "r2 + 1 == 0");
>  	test_fcode0_hdr(hdr);
>  	test_fcode0_mach(mach);
>  	test_fcode0_par(par);


  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-22  9:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-22  7:18 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/9] s390x: Cleanup and maintenance 2 Janosch Frank
2021-09-22  7:18 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/9] s390x: uv: Tolerate 0x100 query return code Janosch Frank
2021-09-22  9:12   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-09-22 11:36     ` Janosch Frank
2021-09-27 15:19       ` Thomas Huth
2021-09-22  7:18 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/9] s390x: pfmf: Fix 1MB handling Janosch Frank
2021-09-22  9:16   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-09-27 15:23   ` Thomas Huth
2021-09-28  9:50     ` Janosch Frank
2021-09-22  7:18 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 3/9] s390x: uv-host: Fence a destroy cpu test on z15 Janosch Frank
2021-09-22  9:18   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-09-27 15:26   ` Thomas Huth
2021-09-28 11:21     ` Janosch Frank
2021-09-28 16:28       ` Thomas Huth
2021-09-22  7:18 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 4/9] lib: s390x: uv: Fix share return value and print Janosch Frank
2021-09-22  9:19   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-09-27 17:38   ` Thomas Huth
2021-09-22  7:18 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 5/9] lib: s390x: uv: Add UVC_ERR_DEBUG switch Janosch Frank
2021-09-22  9:23   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-09-22 11:37     ` Janosch Frank
2021-09-27 17:41   ` Thomas Huth
2021-09-28 10:00     ` Janosch Frank
2021-09-22  7:18 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 6/9] lib: s390x: Print PGM code as hex Janosch Frank
2021-09-22  9:24   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-09-27 17:43   ` Thomas Huth
2021-09-22  7:18 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 7/9] s390x: Makefile: Remove snippet flatlib linking Janosch Frank
2021-09-27 17:47   ` Thomas Huth
2021-09-28  9:57     ` Janosch Frank
2021-09-22  7:18 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 8/9] s390x: Add sthyi cc==0 r2+1 verification Janosch Frank
2021-09-22  9:31   ` Claudio Imbrenda [this message]
2021-09-22  7:18 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 9/9] s390x: skrf: Fix tprot assembly Janosch Frank
2021-09-22  9:34   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-09-22 11:47     ` Janosch Frank
     [not found]   ` <20210922134112.174842-1-scgl@linux.ibm.com>
2021-09-22 13:53     ` Janosch Frank

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210922113152.2489e72a@p-imbrenda \
    --to=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox