From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, thuth@redhat.com, david@redhat.com,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, seiden@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 8/9] s390x: Add sthyi cc==0 r2+1 verification
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 11:31:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210922113152.2489e72a@p-imbrenda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210922071811.1913-9-frankja@linux.ibm.com>
On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 07:18:10 +0000
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On success r2 + 1 should be 0, let's also check for that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
but see comment below
> ---
> s390x/sthyi.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/s390x/sthyi.c b/s390x/sthyi.c
> index db90b56f..4b153bf4 100644
> --- a/s390x/sthyi.c
> +++ b/s390x/sthyi.c
> @@ -24,16 +24,16 @@ static inline int sthyi(uint64_t vaddr, uint64_t fcode, uint64_t *rc,
> {
> register uint64_t code asm("0") = fcode;
> register uint64_t addr asm("2") = vaddr;
> - register uint64_t rc3 asm("3") = 0;
> + register uint64_t rc3 asm("3") = 42;
I am not a big fan of the asm constraints, in the kernel we are
trying to move away from them, but I guess as long as it works it's ok
> int cc = 0;
>
> - asm volatile(".insn rre,0xB2560000,%[r1],%[r2]\n"
> - "ipm %[cc]\n"
> - "srl %[cc],28\n"
> - : [cc] "=d" (cc)
> - : [code] "d" (code), [addr] "a" (addr), [r1] "i" (r1),
> - [r2] "i" (r2)
> - : "memory", "cc", "r3");
> + asm volatile(
> + ".insn rre,0xB2560000,%[r1],%[r2]\n"
> + "ipm %[cc]\n"
> + "srl %[cc],28\n"
> + : [cc] "=d" (cc), "+d" (rc3)
> + : [code] "d" (code), [addr] "a" (addr), [r1] "i" (r1), [r2] "i" (r2)
> + : "memory", "cc");
> if (rc)
> *rc = rc3;
> return cc;
> @@ -139,16 +139,18 @@ static void test_fcode0(void)
> struct sthyi_hdr_sctn *hdr;
> struct sthyi_mach_sctn *mach;
> struct sthyi_par_sctn *par;
> + uint64_t rc = 42;
>
> /* Zero destination memory. */
> memset(pagebuf, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
>
> report_prefix_push("fcode 0");
> - sthyi((uint64_t)pagebuf, 0, NULL, 0, 2);
> + sthyi((uint64_t)pagebuf, 0, &rc, 0, 2);
> hdr = (void *)pagebuf;
> mach = (void *)pagebuf + hdr->INFMOFF;
> par = (void *)pagebuf + hdr->INFPOFF;
>
> + report(!rc, "r2 + 1 == 0");
> test_fcode0_hdr(hdr);
> test_fcode0_mach(mach);
> test_fcode0_par(par);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-22 9:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-22 7:18 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/9] s390x: Cleanup and maintenance 2 Janosch Frank
2021-09-22 7:18 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/9] s390x: uv: Tolerate 0x100 query return code Janosch Frank
2021-09-22 9:12 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-09-22 11:36 ` Janosch Frank
2021-09-27 15:19 ` Thomas Huth
2021-09-22 7:18 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/9] s390x: pfmf: Fix 1MB handling Janosch Frank
2021-09-22 9:16 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-09-27 15:23 ` Thomas Huth
2021-09-28 9:50 ` Janosch Frank
2021-09-22 7:18 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 3/9] s390x: uv-host: Fence a destroy cpu test on z15 Janosch Frank
2021-09-22 9:18 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-09-27 15:26 ` Thomas Huth
2021-09-28 11:21 ` Janosch Frank
2021-09-28 16:28 ` Thomas Huth
2021-09-22 7:18 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 4/9] lib: s390x: uv: Fix share return value and print Janosch Frank
2021-09-22 9:19 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-09-27 17:38 ` Thomas Huth
2021-09-22 7:18 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 5/9] lib: s390x: uv: Add UVC_ERR_DEBUG switch Janosch Frank
2021-09-22 9:23 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-09-22 11:37 ` Janosch Frank
2021-09-27 17:41 ` Thomas Huth
2021-09-28 10:00 ` Janosch Frank
2021-09-22 7:18 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 6/9] lib: s390x: Print PGM code as hex Janosch Frank
2021-09-22 9:24 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-09-27 17:43 ` Thomas Huth
2021-09-22 7:18 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 7/9] s390x: Makefile: Remove snippet flatlib linking Janosch Frank
2021-09-27 17:47 ` Thomas Huth
2021-09-28 9:57 ` Janosch Frank
2021-09-22 7:18 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 8/9] s390x: Add sthyi cc==0 r2+1 verification Janosch Frank
2021-09-22 9:31 ` Claudio Imbrenda [this message]
2021-09-22 7:18 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 9/9] s390x: skrf: Fix tprot assembly Janosch Frank
2021-09-22 9:34 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-09-22 11:47 ` Janosch Frank
[not found] ` <20210922134112.174842-1-scgl@linux.ibm.com>
2021-09-22 13:53 ` Janosch Frank
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210922113152.2489e72a@p-imbrenda \
--to=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox