public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT
	AND 64-BIT)), Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	x86@kernel.org (maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)),
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: SVM: fix AVIC race of host->guest IPI delivery vs AVIC inhibition
Date: Thu,  9 Dec 2021 13:54:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211209115440.394441-4-mlevitsk@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211209115440.394441-1-mlevitsk@redhat.com>

If svm_deliver_avic_intr is called just after the target vcpu's AVIC got
inhibited, it might read a stale value of vcpu->arch.apicv_active
which can lead to the target vCPU not noticing the interrupt.

Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c
index 859ad2dc50f1..8c1b934bfa9b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c
@@ -691,6 +691,15 @@ int svm_deliver_avic_intr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int vec)
 	 * automatically process AVIC interrupts at VMRUN.
 	 */
 	if (vcpu->mode == IN_GUEST_MODE) {
+
+		/*
+		 * At this point we had read the vcpu->arch.apicv_active == true
+		 * and the vcpu->mode == IN_GUEST_MODE.
+		 * Since we have a memory barrier after setting IN_GUEST_MODE,
+		 * it ensures that AVIC inhibition is complete and thus
+		 * the target is really running with AVIC enabled.
+		 */
+
 		int cpu = READ_ONCE(vcpu->cpu);
 
 		/*
@@ -706,10 +715,11 @@ int svm_deliver_avic_intr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int vec)
 		put_cpu();
 	} else {
 		/*
-		 * Wake the vCPU if it was blocking.  KVM will then detect the
-		 * pending IRQ when checking if the vCPU has a wake event.
+		 * Kick the target vCPU otherwise, to make sure
+		 * it processes the interrupt even if its AVIC is inhibited.
 		 */
-		kvm_vcpu_wake_up(vcpu);
+		kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
+		kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
 	}
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.26.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-12-09 11:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-09 11:54 [PATCH 0/6] RFC: KVM: SVM: Allow L1's AVIC to co-exist with nesting Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-09 11:54 ` [PATCH 1/6] KVM: SVM: allow to force AVIC to be enabled Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-09 11:54 ` [PATCH 2/6] KVM: x86: add a tracepoint for APICv/AVIC interrupt delivery Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-09 11:54 ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2021-12-09 14:11   ` [PATCH 3/6] KVM: SVM: fix AVIC race of host->guest IPI delivery vs AVIC inhibition Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-09 14:26     ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-09 15:27       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-09 15:33         ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-09 15:35           ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-09 11:54 ` [PATCH 4/6] KVM: SVM: fix races in the AVIC incomplete IPI delivery to vCPUs Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-09 15:38   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-10 11:37     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-09 11:54 ` [PATCH 5/6] KVM: x86: never clear irr_pending in kvm_apic_update_apicv Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-09 14:12   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-09 15:03     ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-10 12:07   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-10 12:20     ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-10 12:47       ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-10 13:03         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-10 13:10           ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-09 11:54 ` [PATCH 6/6] KVM: SVM: allow AVIC to co-exist with a nested guest running Maxim Levitsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211209115440.394441-4-mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --to=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox