From: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
To: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 4/6] KVM: arm64: Emulate the OS Lock
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 17:28:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211214172812.2894560-5-oupton@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211214172812.2894560-1-oupton@google.com>
The OS lock blocks all debug exceptions at every EL. To date, KVM has
not implemented the OS lock for its guests, despite the fact that it is
mandatory per the architecture. Simple context switching between the
guest and host is not appropriate, as its effects are not constrained to
the guest context.
Emulate the OS Lock by clearing MDE and SS in MDSCR_EL1, thereby
blocking all but software breakpoint instructions.
Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 ++++
arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 6 +++---
3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 53fc8a6eaf1c..e5a06ff1cba6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -726,6 +726,10 @@ void kvm_arm_vcpu_init_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void kvm_arm_reset_debug_ptr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+
+#define kvm_vcpu_os_lock_enabled(vcpu) \
+ (!!(__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, OSLSR_EL1) & SYS_OSLSR_OSLK))
+
int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
struct kvm_device_attr *attr);
int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c
index db9361338b2a..4fd5c216c4bb 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c
@@ -105,9 +105,11 @@ static void kvm_arm_setup_mdcr_el2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
* - Userspace is using the hardware to debug the guest
* (KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW is set).
* - The guest is not using debug (KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_DIRTY is clear).
+ * - The guest has enabled the OS Lock (debug exceptions are blocked).
*/
if ((vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW) ||
- !(vcpu->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_DIRTY))
+ !(vcpu->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_DIRTY) ||
+ kvm_vcpu_os_lock_enabled(vcpu))
vcpu->arch.mdcr_el2 |= MDCR_EL2_TDA;
trace_kvm_arm_set_dreg32("MDCR_EL2", vcpu->arch.mdcr_el2);
@@ -160,8 +162,8 @@ void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
kvm_arm_setup_mdcr_el2(vcpu);
- /* Is Guest debugging in effect? */
- if (vcpu->guest_debug) {
+ /* Check if we need to use the debug registers. */
+ if (vcpu->guest_debug || kvm_vcpu_os_lock_enabled(vcpu)) {
/* Save guest debug state */
save_guest_debug_regs(vcpu);
@@ -223,6 +225,19 @@ void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
trace_kvm_arm_set_regset("WAPTS", get_num_wrps(),
&vcpu->arch.debug_ptr->dbg_wcr[0],
&vcpu->arch.debug_ptr->dbg_wvr[0]);
+
+ /*
+ * The OS Lock blocks debug exceptions in all ELs when it is
+ * enabled. If the guest has enabled the OS Lock, constrain its
+ * effects to the guest. Emulate the behavior by clearing
+ * MDSCR_EL1.MDE. In so doing, we ensure that host debug
+ * exceptions are unaffected by guest configuration of the OS
+ * Lock.
+ */
+ } else if (kvm_vcpu_os_lock_enabled(vcpu)) {
+ mdscr = vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, MDSCR_EL1);
+ mdscr &= ~DBG_MDSCR_MDE;
+ vcpu_write_sys_reg(vcpu, mdscr, MDSCR_EL1);
}
}
@@ -244,7 +259,10 @@ void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
trace_kvm_arm_clear_debug(vcpu->guest_debug);
- if (vcpu->guest_debug) {
+ /*
+ * Restore the guest's debug registers if we were using them.
+ */
+ if (vcpu->guest_debug || kvm_vcpu_os_lock_enabled(vcpu)) {
restore_guest_debug_regs(vcpu);
/*
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 5188a74095e3..50a6966aab1b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -1457,9 +1457,9 @@ static unsigned int mte_visibility(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
* Debug handling: We do trap most, if not all debug related system
* registers. The implementation is good enough to ensure that a guest
* can use these with minimal performance degradation. The drawback is
- * that we don't implement any of the external debug, none of the
- * OSlock protocol. This should be revisited if we ever encounter a
- * more demanding guest...
+ * that we don't implement any of the external debug architecture.
+ * This should be revisited if we ever encounter a more demanding
+ * guest...
*/
static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
{ SYS_DESC(SYS_DC_ISW), access_dcsw },
--
2.34.1.173.g76aa8bc2d0-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-14 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-14 17:28 [PATCH v4 0/6] KVM: arm64: Emulate the OS Lock Oliver Upton
2021-12-14 17:28 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] KVM: arm64: Correctly treat writes to OSLSR_EL1 as undefined Oliver Upton
2021-12-15 11:39 ` Mark Rutland
2021-12-15 13:09 ` Oliver Upton
2021-12-15 14:32 ` Mark Rutland
2021-12-14 17:28 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] KVM: arm64: Stash OSLSR_EL1 in the cpu context Oliver Upton
2021-12-15 11:57 ` Mark Rutland
2021-12-14 17:28 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] KVM: arm64: Allow guest to set the OSLK bit Oliver Upton
2021-12-15 12:15 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-03 17:37 ` Oliver Upton
2021-12-14 17:28 ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2021-12-14 17:28 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] selftests: KVM: Add OSLSR_EL1 to the list of blessed regs Oliver Upton
2021-12-14 17:28 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] selftests: KVM: Test OS lock behavior Oliver Upton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211214172812.2894560-5-oupton@google.com \
--to=oupton@google.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=pshier@google.com \
--cc=reijiw@google.com \
--cc=ricarkol@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox