From: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
Peng Liang <liangpeng10@huawei.com>,
Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
Raghavendra Rao Anata <rananta@google.com>,
Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 14/26] KVM: arm64: Add consistency checking for frac fields of ID registers
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 20:26:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220106042708.2869332-15-reijiw@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220106042708.2869332-1-reijiw@google.com>
Feature fractional field of an ID register cannot be simply validated
at KVM_SET_ONE_REG because its validity depends on its (main) feature
field value, which could be in a different ID register (and might be
set later).
Validate fractional fields at the first KVM_RUN instead.
Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 3 +
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
3 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 4509f9e7472d..7b3f86bd6a6b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -750,6 +750,7 @@ long kvm_vm_ioctl_mte_copy_tags(struct kvm *kvm,
void set_default_id_regs(struct kvm *kvm);
int kvm_set_id_reg_feature(struct kvm *kvm, u32 id, u8 field_shift, u8 fval);
+int kvm_id_regs_consistency_check(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
/* Guest/host FPSIMD coordination helpers */
int kvm_arch_vcpu_run_map_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index 5f497a0af254..16fc2ce32069 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -596,6 +596,9 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_first_run_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (!kvm_arm_vcpu_is_finalized(vcpu))
return -EPERM;
+ if (!kvm_vm_is_protected(kvm) && kvm_id_regs_consistency_check(vcpu))
+ return -EPERM;
+
vcpu->arch.has_run_once = true;
kvm_arm_vcpu_init_debug(vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index ddbeefc3881c..6adb7b04620c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -756,9 +756,6 @@ static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr0_el1_info = {
static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr1_el1_info = {
.sys_reg = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1,
- .ignore_mask = ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_RASFRAC) |
- ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_MPAMFRAC) |
- ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_CSV2FRAC),
.init = init_id_aa64pfr1_el1_info,
.validate = validate_id_aa64pfr1_el1,
.vcpu_mask = vcpu_mask_id_aa64pfr1_el1,
@@ -3434,10 +3431,109 @@ int kvm_arm_copy_sys_reg_indices(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 __user *uindices)
return write_demux_regids(uindices);
}
+/* ID register's fractional field information with its feature field. */
+struct feature_frac {
+ u32 id;
+ u32 shift;
+ u32 frac_id;
+ u32 frac_shift;
+ u8 frac_ftr_check;
+};
+
+static struct feature_frac feature_frac_table[] = {
+ {
+ .frac_id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1,
+ .frac_shift = ID_AA64PFR1_RASFRAC_SHIFT,
+ .id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
+ .shift = ID_AA64PFR0_RAS_SHIFT,
+ },
+ {
+ .frac_id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1,
+ .frac_shift = ID_AA64PFR1_MPAMFRAC_SHIFT,
+ .id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
+ .shift = ID_AA64PFR0_MPAM_SHIFT,
+ },
+ {
+ .frac_id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1,
+ .frac_shift = ID_AA64PFR1_CSV2FRAC_SHIFT,
+ .id = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
+ .shift = ID_AA64PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT,
+ },
+};
+
+/*
+ * Return non-zero if the feature/fractional fields pair are not
+ * supported. Return zero otherwise.
+ * This function validates only the fractional feature field,
+ * and relies on the fact the feature field is validated before
+ * through arm64_check_features.
+ */
+static int vcpu_id_reg_feature_frac_check(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ const struct feature_frac *ftr_frac)
+{
+ const struct id_reg_info *id_reg;
+ u32 id;
+ u64 val, lim, mask;
+
+ /* Check if the feature field value is same as the limit */
+ id = ftr_frac->id;
+ id_reg = GET_ID_REG_INFO(id);
+
+ mask = (u64)ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_MASK << ftr_frac->shift;
+ val = __read_id_reg(vcpu, id) & mask;
+ lim = id_reg ? id_reg->vcpu_limit_val : read_sanitised_ftr_reg(id);
+ lim &= mask;
+
+ if (val != lim)
+ /*
+ * The feature level is lower than the limit.
+ * Any fractional version should be fine.
+ */
+ return 0;
+
+ /* Check the fractional feature field */
+ id = ftr_frac->frac_id;
+ id_reg = GET_ID_REG_INFO(id);
+
+ mask = (u64)ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_MASK << ftr_frac->frac_shift;
+ val = __read_id_reg(vcpu, id) & mask;
+ lim = id_reg ? id_reg->vcpu_limit_val : read_sanitised_ftr_reg(id);
+ lim &= mask;
+
+ if (val == lim)
+ /*
+ * Both the feature and fractional fields are the same
+ * as limit.
+ */
+ return 0;
+
+ return arm64_check_features(id, val, lim);
+}
+
+int kvm_id_regs_consistency_check(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ int i, err;
+ const struct feature_frac *frac;
+
+ /*
+ * Check ID registers' fractional fields, which aren't checked
+ * at KVM_SET_ONE_REG.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(feature_frac_table); i++) {
+ frac = &feature_frac_table[i];
+ err = vcpu_id_reg_feature_frac_check(vcpu, frac);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
static void id_reg_info_init_all(void)
{
int i;
struct id_reg_info *id_reg;
+ struct feature_frac *frac;
+ u64 ftr_mask = ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_MASK;
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(id_reg_info_table); i++) {
id_reg = (struct id_reg_info *)id_reg_info_table[i];
@@ -3446,6 +3542,20 @@ static void id_reg_info_init_all(void)
id_reg_info_init(id_reg);
}
+
+ /*
+ * Update ignore_mask of ID registers based on fractional fields
+ * information. Any ID register that have fractional fields
+ * is expected to have its own id_reg_info.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(feature_frac_table); i++) {
+ frac = &feature_frac_table[i];
+ id_reg = GET_ID_REG_INFO(frac->frac_id);
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!id_reg))
+ continue;
+
+ id_reg->ignore_mask |= ftr_mask << frac->frac_shift;
+ }
}
void kvm_sys_reg_table_init(void)
--
2.34.1.448.ga2b2bfdf31-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-06 4:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-06 4:26 [RFC PATCH v4 00/26] KVM: arm64: Make CPU ID registers writable by userspace Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06 4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 01/26] KVM: arm64: Introduce a validation function for an ID register Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-07 7:12 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-24 16:20 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-26 6:04 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-01 14:13 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-02-02 6:46 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-26 4:30 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-01-28 6:01 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06 4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 02/26] KVM: arm64: Save ID registers' sanitized value per guest Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-24 16:21 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-02-09 2:26 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-26 5:22 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-01-28 6:24 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-28 19:27 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-01-29 5:52 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-31 3:40 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-02-01 6:00 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-01 18:38 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-02-03 6:31 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-04 14:41 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-01-06 4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 03/26] KVM: arm64: Introduce struct id_reg_info Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-24 16:28 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-26 6:46 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-01 14:13 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-06 4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 04/26] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64PFR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-24 16:51 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-27 4:01 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-01 14:14 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-02-10 5:33 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06 4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 05/26] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06 4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 06/26] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06 4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 07/26] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06 4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 08/26] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06 4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 09/26] KVM: arm64: Hide IMPLEMENTATION DEFINED PMU support for the guest Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06 4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 10/26] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06 4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 11/26] KVM: arm64: Make ID_DFR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06 4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 12/26] KVM: arm64: Make MVFR1_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06 4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 13/26] KVM: arm64: Make ID registers without id_reg_info writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06 4:26 ` Reiji Watanabe [this message]
2022-01-24 17:00 ` [RFC PATCH v4 14/26] KVM: arm64: Add consistency checking for frac fields of ID registers Fuad Tabba
2022-01-27 5:03 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06 4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 15/26] KVM: arm64: Introduce KVM_CAP_ARM_ID_REG_CONFIGURABLE capability Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06 4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 16/26] KVM: arm64: Add kunit test for ID register validation Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06 4:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 17/26] KVM: arm64: Use vcpu->arch cptr_el2 to track value of cptr_el2 for VHE Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06 4:27 ` [RFC PATCH v4 18/26] KVM: arm64: Use vcpu->arch.mdcr_el2 to track value of mdcr_el2 Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06 4:27 ` [RFC PATCH v4 19/26] KVM: arm64: Introduce framework to trap disabled features Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06 4:27 ` [RFC PATCH v4 20/26] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64PFR0_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-24 17:16 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-27 7:19 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-01 14:14 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-02-10 4:15 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06 4:27 ` [RFC PATCH v4 21/26] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06 4:27 ` [RFC PATCH v4 22/26] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-24 17:19 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-28 5:40 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06 4:27 ` [RFC PATCH v4 23/26] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-24 17:37 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-28 5:43 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-09 4:51 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06 4:27 ` [RFC PATCH v4 24/26] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06 4:27 ` [RFC PATCH v4 25/26] KVM: arm64: Add kunit test for trap initialization Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-06 4:27 ` [RFC PATCH v4 26/26] KVM: arm64: selftests: Introduce id_reg_test Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-18 4:24 ` [RFC PATCH v4 00/26] KVM: arm64: Make CPU ID registers writable by userspace Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-24 16:18 ` Fuad Tabba
2022-01-25 6:31 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-01 14:12 ` Fuad Tabba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220106042708.2869332-15-reijiw@google.com \
--to=reijiw@google.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jingzhangos@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=liangpeng10@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pshier@google.com \
--cc=rananta@google.com \
--cc=ricarkol@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).