kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, drjones@redhat.com
Cc: maz@kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	oupton@google.com, reijiw@google.com,
	Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] kvm: selftests: aarch64: fix some vgic related comments
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 09:39:05 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220120173905.1047015-3-ricarkol@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220120173905.1047015-1-ricarkol@google.com>

Fix the formatting of some comments and the wording of one of them (in
gicv3_access_reg).

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
Reported-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_irq.c   | 12 ++++++++----
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/gic_v3.c | 11 +++++++----
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/vgic.c   |  3 ++-
 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_irq.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_irq.c
index e6c7d7f8fbd1..258bb5150a07 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_irq.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vgic_irq.c
@@ -306,7 +306,8 @@ static void guest_restore_active(struct test_args *args,
 	uint32_t prio, intid, ap1r;
 	int i;
 
-	/* Set the priorities of the first (KVM_NUM_PRIOS - 1) IRQs
+	/*
+	 * Set the priorities of the first (KVM_NUM_PRIOS - 1) IRQs
 	 * in descending order, so intid+1 can preempt intid.
 	 */
 	for (i = 0, prio = (num - 1) * 8; i < num; i++, prio -= 8) {
@@ -315,7 +316,8 @@ static void guest_restore_active(struct test_args *args,
 		gic_set_priority(intid, prio);
 	}
 
-	/* In a real migration, KVM would restore all GIC state before running
+	/*
+	 * In a real migration, KVM would restore all GIC state before running
 	 * guest code.
 	 */
 	for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
@@ -503,7 +505,8 @@ static void guest_code(struct test_args args)
 		test_injection_failure(&args, f);
 	}
 
-	/* Restore the active state of IRQs. This would happen when live
+	/*
+	 * Restore the active state of IRQs. This would happen when live
 	 * migrating IRQs in the middle of being handled.
 	 */
 	for_each_supported_activate_fn(&args, set_active_fns, f)
@@ -837,7 +840,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 		}
 	}
 
-	/* If the user just specified nr_irqs and/or gic_version, then run all
+	/*
+	 * If the user just specified nr_irqs and/or gic_version, then run all
 	 * combinations.
 	 */
 	if (default_args) {
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/gic_v3.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/gic_v3.c
index e4945fe66620..93fc35b88410 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/gic_v3.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/gic_v3.c
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ struct gicv3_data {
 	unsigned int nr_spis;
 };
 
-#define sgi_base_from_redist(redist_base) 	(redist_base + SZ_64K)
+#define sgi_base_from_redist(redist_base)	(redist_base + SZ_64K)
 #define DIST_BIT				(1U << 31)
 
 enum gicv3_intid_range {
@@ -105,7 +105,8 @@ static void gicv3_set_eoi_split(bool split)
 {
 	uint32_t val;
 
-	/* All other fields are read-only, so no need to read CTLR first. In
+	/*
+	 * All other fields are read-only, so no need to read CTLR first. In
 	 * fact, the kernel does the same.
 	 */
 	val = split ? (1U << 1) : 0;
@@ -160,8 +161,10 @@ static void gicv3_access_reg(uint32_t intid, uint64_t offset,
 
 	GUEST_ASSERT(bits_per_field <= reg_bits);
 	GUEST_ASSERT(!write || *val < (1U << bits_per_field));
-	/* Some registers like IROUTER are 64 bit long. Those are currently not
-	 * supported by readl nor writel, so just asserting here until then.
+	/*
+	 * This function does not support 64 bit accesses as those are
+	 * currently not supported by readl nor writel, so just asserting here
+	 * until then.
 	 */
 	GUEST_ASSERT(reg_bits == 32);
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/vgic.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/vgic.c
index b3a0fca0d780..79864b941617 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/vgic.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/vgic.c
@@ -150,7 +150,8 @@ static void vgic_poke_irq(int gic_fd, uint32_t intid,
 		attr += SZ_64K;
 	}
 
-	/* All calls will succeed, even with invalid intid's, as long as the
+	/*
+	 * All calls will succeed, even with invalid intid's, as long as the
 	 * addr part of the attr is within 32 bits (checked above). An invalid
 	 * intid will just make the read/writes point to above the intended
 	 * register space (i.e., ICPENDR after ISPENDR).
-- 
2.35.0.rc0.227.g00780c9af4-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-01-20 17:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-20 17:39 [PATCH 0/2] kvm: selftests: aarch64: some fixes for vgic_irq Ricardo Koller
2022-01-20 17:39 ` [PATCH 1/2] kvm: selftests: aarch64: fix assert in gicv3_access_reg Ricardo Koller
2022-01-26 15:17   ` Andrew Jones
2022-01-20 17:39 ` Ricardo Koller [this message]
2022-01-26 15:22   ` [PATCH 2/2] kvm: selftests: aarch64: fix some vgic related comments Andrew Jones
2022-01-26 18:44     ` Ricardo Koller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220120173905.1047015-3-ricarkol@google.com \
    --to=ricarkol@google.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@google.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=reijiw@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).