From: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
Peng Liang <liangpeng10@huawei.com>,
Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
Raghavendra Rao Anata <rananta@google.com>,
Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 09/27] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1 writable
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2022 22:57:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220214065746.1230608-10-reijiw@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220214065746.1230608-1-reijiw@google.com>
This patch adds id_reg_info for ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1 to make it
writable by userspace.
Hardware update of Access flag and/or Dirty state in translation
table needs to be disabled for the guest to let userspace set
ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1.HAFDBS field to a lower value. It requires trapping
the guest's accessing TCR_EL1, which KVM doesn't always do (in order
to trap it without FEAT_FGT, HCR_EL2.TVM needs to be set to 1, which
also traps many other virtual memory control registers).
So, userspace won't be allowed to modify the value of the HAFDBS field.
Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 4ed15ae7f160..1c137f8c236f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -570,6 +570,30 @@ static int validate_id_aa64mmfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
return 0;
}
+static int validate_id_aa64mmfr1_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ const struct id_reg_info *id_reg, u64 val)
+{
+ u64 limit = id_reg->vcpu_limit_val;
+ unsigned int hafdbs, lim_hafdbs;
+
+ hafdbs = cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(val, ID_AA64MMFR1_HADBS_SHIFT);
+ lim_hafdbs = cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(limit, ID_AA64MMFR1_HADBS_SHIFT);
+
+ /*
+ * Don't allow userspace to modify the value of HAFDBS.
+ * Hardware update of Access flag and/or Dirty state in translation
+ * table needs to be disabled for the guest to let userspace set
+ * HAFDBS field to a lower value. It requires trapping the guest's
+ * accessing TCR_EL1, which KVM doesn't always do (in order to trap
+ * it without FEAT_FGT, HCR_EL2.TVM needs to be set to 1, which also
+ * traps many other virtual memory control registers).
+ */
+ if (hafdbs != lim_hafdbs)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static void init_id_aa64pfr0_el1_info(struct id_reg_info *id_reg)
{
u64 limit = id_reg->vcpu_limit_val;
@@ -675,6 +699,11 @@ static struct id_reg_info id_aa64mmfr0_el1_info = {
.validate = validate_id_aa64mmfr0_el1,
};
+static struct id_reg_info id_aa64mmfr1_el1_info = {
+ .sys_reg = SYS_ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1,
+ .validate = validate_id_aa64mmfr1_el1,
+};
+
/*
* An ID register that needs special handling to control the value for the
* guest must have its own id_reg_info in id_reg_info_table.
@@ -689,6 +718,7 @@ static struct id_reg_info *id_reg_info_table[KVM_ARM_ID_REG_MAX_NUM] = {
[IDREG_IDX(SYS_ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1)] = &id_aa64isar0_el1_info,
[IDREG_IDX(SYS_ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1)] = &id_aa64isar1_el1_info,
[IDREG_IDX(SYS_ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1)] = &id_aa64mmfr0_el1_info,
+ [IDREG_IDX(SYS_ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1)] = &id_aa64mmfr1_el1_info,
};
static int validate_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 id, u64 val)
--
2.35.1.265.g69c8d7142f-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-14 6:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-14 6:57 [PATCH v5 00/27] KVM: arm64: Make CPU ID registers writable by userspace Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 01/27] KVM: arm64: Introduce a validation function for an ID register Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 02/27] KVM: arm64: Save ID registers' sanitized value per guest Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 03/27] KVM: arm64: Introduce struct id_reg_info Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-17 5:14 ` Oliver Upton
2022-02-22 6:12 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 04/27] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64PFR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 05/27] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 06/27] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 07/27] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 08/27] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` Reiji Watanabe [this message]
2022-02-15 18:53 ` [PATCH v5 09/27] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1 writable Oliver Upton
2022-02-15 20:24 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 10/27] KVM: arm64: Hide IMPLEMENTATION DEFINED PMU support for the guest Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-15 18:57 ` Oliver Upton
2022-02-16 2:52 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-17 4:59 ` Oliver Upton
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 11/27] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 12/27] KVM: arm64: Make ID_DFR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 13/27] KVM: arm64: Make MVFR1_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 14/27] KVM: arm64: Make ID registers without id_reg_info writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 15/27] KVM: arm64: Add consistency checking for frac fields of ID registers Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 16/27] KVM: arm64: Introduce KVM_CAP_ARM_ID_REG_CONFIGURABLE capability Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 17/27] KVM: arm64: Add kunit test for ID register validation Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 18/27] KVM: arm64: Use vcpu->arch cptr_el2 to track value of cptr_el2 for VHE Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 19/27] KVM: arm64: Use vcpu->arch.mdcr_el2 to track value of mdcr_el2 Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 20/27] KVM: arm64: Introduce framework to trap disabled features Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 21/27] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64PFR0_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 22/27] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 23/27] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 24/27] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 25/27] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 26/27] KVM: arm64: Add kunit test for trap initialization Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 27/27] KVM: arm64: selftests: Introduce id_reg_test Reiji Watanabe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220214065746.1230608-10-reijiw@google.com \
--to=reijiw@google.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jingzhangos@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=liangpeng10@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pshier@google.com \
--cc=rananta@google.com \
--cc=ricarkol@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox