From: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
Peng Liang <liangpeng10@huawei.com>,
Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
Raghavendra Rao Anata <rananta@google.com>,
Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 05/27] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 writable
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2022 22:57:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220214065746.1230608-6-reijiw@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220214065746.1230608-1-reijiw@google.com>
This patch adds id_reg_info for ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 to make it writable
by userspace.
Return an error if userspace tries to set MTE field of the register
to a value that conflicts with KVM_CAP_ARM_MTE configuration for
the guest.
Skip fractional feature fields validation at present and they will
be handled by the following patches.
Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 1 +
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
index bfdf32ff5985..b7fb26f5a8f8 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
@@ -816,6 +816,7 @@
#define ID_AA64PFR0_GIC3 0x1
/* id_aa64pfr1 */
+#define ID_AA64PFR1_CSV2FRAC_SHIFT 32
#define ID_AA64PFR1_MPAMFRAC_SHIFT 16
#define ID_AA64PFR1_RASFRAC_SHIFT 12
#define ID_AA64PFR1_MTE_SHIFT 8
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 14df7c112e57..b41e9662736d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -372,6 +372,21 @@ static int validate_id_aa64pfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
return 0;
}
+static int validate_id_aa64pfr1_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ const struct id_reg_info *id_reg, u64 val)
+{
+ bool kvm_mte = kvm_has_mte(vcpu->kvm);
+ unsigned int mte;
+
+ mte = cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(val, ID_AA64PFR1_MTE_SHIFT);
+
+ /* Check if there is a conflict with a request via KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT. */
+ if (kvm_mte ^ (mte > 0))
+ return -EPERM;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static void init_id_aa64pfr0_el1_info(struct id_reg_info *id_reg)
{
u64 limit = id_reg->vcpu_limit_val;
@@ -403,12 +418,24 @@ static void init_id_aa64pfr0_el1_info(struct id_reg_info *id_reg)
id_reg->vcpu_limit_val = limit;
}
+static void init_id_aa64pfr1_el1_info(struct id_reg_info *id_reg)
+{
+ if (!system_supports_mte())
+ id_reg->vcpu_limit_val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_MTE);
+}
+
static u64 vcpu_mask_id_aa64pfr0_el1(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
const struct id_reg_info *idr)
{
return vcpu_has_sve(vcpu) ? 0 : ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_SVE);
}
+static u64 vcpu_mask_id_aa64pfr1_el1(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ const struct id_reg_info *idr)
+{
+ return kvm_has_mte(vcpu->kvm) ? 0 : (ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_MTE));
+}
+
static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr0_el1_info = {
.sys_reg = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
.ignore_mask = ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_GIC),
@@ -417,6 +444,16 @@ static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr0_el1_info = {
.vcpu_mask = vcpu_mask_id_aa64pfr0_el1,
};
+static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr1_el1_info = {
+ .sys_reg = SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1,
+ .ignore_mask = ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_RASFRAC) |
+ ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_MPAMFRAC) |
+ ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_CSV2FRAC),
+ .init = init_id_aa64pfr1_el1_info,
+ .validate = validate_id_aa64pfr1_el1,
+ .vcpu_mask = vcpu_mask_id_aa64pfr1_el1,
+};
+
/*
* An ID register that needs special handling to control the value for the
* guest must have its own id_reg_info in id_reg_info_table.
@@ -427,6 +464,7 @@ static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr0_el1_info = {
#define GET_ID_REG_INFO(id) (id_reg_info_table[IDREG_IDX(id)])
static struct id_reg_info *id_reg_info_table[KVM_ARM_ID_REG_MAX_NUM] = {
[IDREG_IDX(SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1)] = &id_aa64pfr0_el1_info,
+ [IDREG_IDX(SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1)] = &id_aa64pfr1_el1_info,
};
static int validate_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 id, u64 val)
@@ -1351,10 +1389,6 @@ static u64 __read_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 id)
val &= ~(id_reg->vcpu_mask(vcpu, id_reg));
switch (id) {
- case SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1:
- if (!kvm_has_mte(vcpu->kvm))
- val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_MTE);
- break;
case SYS_ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1:
if (!vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu))
val &= ~(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64ISAR1_APA) |
--
2.35.1.265.g69c8d7142f-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-14 6:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-14 6:57 [PATCH v5 00/27] KVM: arm64: Make CPU ID registers writable by userspace Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 01/27] KVM: arm64: Introduce a validation function for an ID register Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 02/27] KVM: arm64: Save ID registers' sanitized value per guest Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 03/27] KVM: arm64: Introduce struct id_reg_info Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-17 5:14 ` Oliver Upton
2022-02-22 6:12 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 04/27] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64PFR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` Reiji Watanabe [this message]
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 06/27] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 07/27] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 08/27] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 09/27] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-15 18:53 ` Oliver Upton
2022-02-15 20:24 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 10/27] KVM: arm64: Hide IMPLEMENTATION DEFINED PMU support for the guest Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-15 18:57 ` Oliver Upton
2022-02-16 2:52 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-17 4:59 ` Oliver Upton
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 11/27] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 12/27] KVM: arm64: Make ID_DFR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 13/27] KVM: arm64: Make MVFR1_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 14/27] KVM: arm64: Make ID registers without id_reg_info writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 15/27] KVM: arm64: Add consistency checking for frac fields of ID registers Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 16/27] KVM: arm64: Introduce KVM_CAP_ARM_ID_REG_CONFIGURABLE capability Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 17/27] KVM: arm64: Add kunit test for ID register validation Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 18/27] KVM: arm64: Use vcpu->arch cptr_el2 to track value of cptr_el2 for VHE Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 19/27] KVM: arm64: Use vcpu->arch.mdcr_el2 to track value of mdcr_el2 Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 20/27] KVM: arm64: Introduce framework to trap disabled features Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 21/27] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64PFR0_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 22/27] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 23/27] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 24/27] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 25/27] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 26/27] KVM: arm64: Add kunit test for trap initialization Reiji Watanabe
2022-02-14 6:57 ` [PATCH v5 27/27] KVM: arm64: selftests: Introduce id_reg_test Reiji Watanabe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220214065746.1230608-6-reijiw@google.com \
--to=reijiw@google.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jingzhangos@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=liangpeng10@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pshier@google.com \
--cc=rananta@google.com \
--cc=ricarkol@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox