From: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
Subject: [PATCH 03/11] KVM: x86/pmu: Pass only "struct kvm_pmc *pmc" to reprogram_counter()
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 19:51:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220221115201.22208-4-likexu@tencent.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220221115201.22208-1-likexu@tencent.com>
From: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
Passing the reference "struct kvm_pmc *pmc" when creating
pmc->perf_event is sufficient. This change helps to simplify the
calling convention by replacing reprogram_{gp, fixed}_counter()
with reprogram_counter() seamlessly.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c | 17 +++++------------
arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++--------------
3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
index 78527b118f72..125bdfdbaa7a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
@@ -286,18 +286,13 @@ void reprogram_fixed_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc, u8 ctrl, int idx)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(reprogram_fixed_counter);
-void reprogram_counter(struct kvm_pmu *pmu, int pmc_idx)
+void reprogram_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
{
- struct kvm_pmc *pmc = kvm_x86_ops.pmu_ops->pmc_idx_to_pmc(pmu, pmc_idx);
-
- if (!pmc)
- return;
-
if (pmc_is_gp(pmc))
reprogram_gp_counter(pmc, pmc->eventsel);
else {
- int idx = pmc_idx - INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED;
- u8 ctrl = fixed_ctrl_field(pmu->fixed_ctr_ctrl, idx);
+ int idx = pmc->idx - INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED;
+ u8 ctrl = fixed_ctrl_field(pmc_to_pmu(pmc)->fixed_ctr_ctrl, idx);
reprogram_fixed_counter(pmc, ctrl, idx);
}
@@ -316,8 +311,7 @@ void kvm_pmu_handle_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
clear_bit(bit, pmu->reprogram_pmi);
continue;
}
-
- reprogram_counter(pmu, bit);
+ reprogram_counter(pmc);
}
/*
@@ -503,13 +497,12 @@ void kvm_pmu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
static void kvm_pmu_incr_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
{
- struct kvm_pmu *pmu = pmc_to_pmu(pmc);
u64 prev_count;
prev_count = pmc->counter;
pmc->counter = (pmc->counter + 1) & pmc_bitmask(pmc);
- reprogram_counter(pmu, pmc->idx);
+ reprogram_counter(pmc);
if (pmc->counter < prev_count)
__kvm_perf_overflow(pmc, false);
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
index 7a7b8d5b775e..b529c54dc309 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ static inline u64 get_sample_period(struct kvm_pmc *pmc, u64 counter_value)
void reprogram_gp_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc, u64 eventsel);
void reprogram_fixed_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc, u8 ctrl, int fixed_idx);
-void reprogram_counter(struct kvm_pmu *pmu, int pmc_idx);
+void reprogram_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc);
void kvm_pmu_deliver_pmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void kvm_pmu_handle_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
index 466d18fc0c5d..049ce5519fb5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
@@ -56,16 +56,32 @@ static void reprogram_fixed_counters(struct kvm_pmu *pmu, u64 data)
pmu->fixed_ctr_ctrl = data;
}
+static struct kvm_pmc *intel_pmc_idx_to_pmc(struct kvm_pmu *pmu, int pmc_idx)
+{
+ if (pmc_idx < INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED)
+ return get_gp_pmc(pmu, MSR_P6_EVNTSEL0 + pmc_idx,
+ MSR_P6_EVNTSEL0);
+ else {
+ u32 idx = pmc_idx - INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED;
+
+ return get_fixed_pmc(pmu, idx + MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0);
+ }
+}
+
/* function is called when global control register has been updated. */
static void global_ctrl_changed(struct kvm_pmu *pmu, u64 data)
{
int bit;
u64 diff = pmu->global_ctrl ^ data;
+ struct kvm_pmc *pmc;
pmu->global_ctrl = data;
- for_each_set_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)&diff, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX)
- reprogram_counter(pmu, bit);
+ for_each_set_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)&diff, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX) {
+ pmc = intel_pmc_idx_to_pmc(pmu, bit);
+ if (pmc)
+ reprogram_counter(pmc);
+ }
}
static unsigned int intel_pmc_perf_hw_id(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
@@ -101,18 +117,6 @@ static bool intel_pmc_is_enabled(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
return test_bit(pmc->idx, (unsigned long *)&pmu->global_ctrl);
}
-static struct kvm_pmc *intel_pmc_idx_to_pmc(struct kvm_pmu *pmu, int pmc_idx)
-{
- if (pmc_idx < INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED)
- return get_gp_pmc(pmu, MSR_P6_EVNTSEL0 + pmc_idx,
- MSR_P6_EVNTSEL0);
- else {
- u32 idx = pmc_idx - INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED;
-
- return get_fixed_pmc(pmu, idx + MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0);
- }
-}
-
static bool intel_is_valid_rdpmc_ecx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int idx)
{
struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
--
2.35.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-21 11:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-21 11:51 [PATCH 00/11] KVM: x86/pmu: Get rid of PERF_TYPE_HARDWAR and other minor fixes Like Xu
2022-02-21 11:51 ` [PATCH 01/11] KVM: x86/pmu: Update comments for AMD gp counters Like Xu
2022-02-23 19:50 ` Jim Mattson
2022-02-21 11:51 ` [PATCH 02/11] KVM: x86/pmu: Extract check_pmu_event_filter() from the same semantics Like Xu
2022-02-21 11:51 ` Like Xu [this message]
2022-02-21 11:51 ` [PATCH 04/11] KVM: x86/pmu: Drop "u64 eventsel" for reprogram_gp_counter() Like Xu
2022-02-21 11:51 ` [PATCH 05/11] KVM: x86/pmu: Drop "u8 ctrl, int idx" for reprogram_fixed_counter() Like Xu
2022-02-21 11:51 ` [PATCH 06/11] KVM: x86/pmu: Use only the uniformly exported interface reprogram_counter() Like Xu
2022-02-21 11:51 ` [PATCH 07/11] KVM: x86/pmu: Use PERF_TYPE_RAW to merge reprogram_{gp, fixed}counter() Like Xu
2022-02-21 11:51 ` [PATCH 08/11] perf: x86/core: Add interface to query perfmon_event_map[] directly Like Xu
2022-02-21 11:51 ` [PATCH 09/11] KVM: x86/pmu: Replace pmc_perf_hw_id() with perf_get_hw_event_config() Like Xu
2022-02-21 20:57 ` kernel test robot
2022-02-21 11:52 ` [PATCH 10/11] KVM: x86/pmu: Drop amd_event_mapping[] in the KVM context Like Xu
2022-02-21 11:52 ` [PATCH 11/11] KVM: x86/pmu: Protect kvm->arch.pmu_event_filter with SRCU Like Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220221115201.22208-4-likexu@tencent.com \
--to=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=likexu@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox