From: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>,
thuth@redhat.com, david@redhat.com,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 6/8] s390x: Add more tests for STSCH
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 15:08:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220224150820.3c20ff8d.pasic@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <04daca6a-5863-d205-ea98-096163a2296a@linux.ibm.com>
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 16:39:07 +0100
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> We could check if bits 0,1 and 6,7 are also zero but I'm not sure if
> that's interesting since MSCH does not ignore those bits and should
> result in an operand exception when trying to set them.
>
> @Halil, @Pierre: Any opinions?
IMHO more testing doesn't hurt. But I don't have clarity on some aspect
of how the architecture is extended. What I'm trying to say is: I'm not
100% certain these bits must stay 0 and no-semantics-defined forever.
Regards,
Halil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-24 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-23 13:29 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 0/8] s390x: Extend instruction interception tests Nico Boehr
2022-02-23 13:29 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 1/8] s390x: Add more tests for MSCH Nico Boehr
2022-02-23 13:29 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 2/8] s390x: Add test for PFMF low-address protection Nico Boehr
2022-02-23 13:29 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 3/8] s390x: Add sck tests Nico Boehr
2022-02-23 13:29 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 4/8] s390x: Add tests for STCRW Nico Boehr
2022-02-23 13:29 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 5/8] s390x: Add more tests for SSCH Nico Boehr
2022-02-23 13:29 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 6/8] s390x: Add more tests for STSCH Nico Boehr
2022-02-23 15:16 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-02-23 15:39 ` Janosch Frank
2022-02-23 17:33 ` Nico Boehr
2022-02-24 0:13 ` Halil Pasic
2022-02-24 10:27 ` Pierre Morel
2022-02-24 10:28 ` Pierre Morel
2022-02-24 14:08 ` Halil Pasic [this message]
2022-02-23 13:29 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 7/8] s390x: Add tests for TSCH Nico Boehr
2022-02-23 13:29 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 8/8] s390x: Add EPSW test Nico Boehr
2022-02-23 15:14 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 0/8] s390x: Extend instruction interception tests Claudio Imbrenda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220224150820.3c20ff8d.pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--to=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox