public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Cc: Zeng Guang <guang.zeng@intel.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>,
	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
	Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>,
	Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Robert Hu <robert.hu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 7/9] KVM: VMX: enable IPI virtualization
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 14:45:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220302064556.GA18820@gao-cwp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220301092144.GA32619@gao-cwp>

>>>  static void init_vmcs(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
>>>  {
>>> +	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = &vmx->vcpu;
>>> +	struct kvm_vmx *kvm_vmx = to_kvm_vmx(vcpu->kvm);
>>> +
>>>  	if (nested)
>>>  		nested_vmx_set_vmcs_shadowing_bitmap();
>>>  
>>> @@ -4431,7 +4460,7 @@ static void init_vmcs(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
>>>  	if (cpu_has_tertiary_exec_ctrls())
>>>  		tertiary_exec_controls_set(vmx, vmx_tertiary_exec_control(vmx));
>>>  
>>> -	if (kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(&vmx->vcpu)) {
>>> +	if (kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(vcpu)) {
>>
>>here too (pre-existing), I also not 100% sure that kvm_vcpu_apicv_active
>>should be used. I haven't studied APICv code that much to be 100% sure.
>

On second thoughts, I think you are correct. Below VMCS fields 
(i.e, EIO_EXIT_BITMAP0/1/2, POSTED_INTR_NV/DESC_ADDR) should be configured as
long as the VM can enable APICv, particularly considering
vmx_refresh_apicv_exec_ctrl() doesn't configure these VMCS fields when APICv
gets activated.

This is a latent bug in KVM. We will fix it with a separate patch.

>I think kvm_vcpu_apicv_active is better.
>
>The question is: If CPU supports a VMX feature (APICv), but it isn't enabled
>now, is it allowed to configure VMCS fields defined by the feature?  Would CPU
>ignore the values written to the fields or retain them after enabling the
>feature later?

This concern is invalid. SDM doesn't mention any ordering requirement about
configuring a feature's vm-execution bit and other VMCS fields introduced for
the feature. Please disregard my original remark.

>
>Personally, KVM shouldn't rely on CPU's behavior in this case. So, It is better
>for KVM to write below VMCS fields only if APICv is enabled.
>
>>
>>
>>>  		vmcs_write64(EOI_EXIT_BITMAP0, 0);
>>>  		vmcs_write64(EOI_EXIT_BITMAP1, 0);
>>>  		vmcs_write64(EOI_EXIT_BITMAP2, 0);
>>> @@ -4441,6 +4470,13 @@ static void init_vmcs(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
>>>  
>>>  		vmcs_write16(POSTED_INTR_NV, POSTED_INTR_VECTOR);
>>>  		vmcs_write64(POSTED_INTR_DESC_ADDR, __pa((&vmx->pi_desc)));
>>> +
>>> +		if (enable_ipiv) {
>>> +			WRITE_ONCE(kvm_vmx->pid_table[vcpu->vcpu_id],
>>> +				__pa(&vmx->pi_desc) | PID_TABLE_ENTRY_VALID);
>>> +			vmcs_write64(PID_POINTER_TABLE, __pa(kvm_vmx->pid_table));
>>> +			vmcs_write16(LAST_PID_POINTER_INDEX, kvm_vmx->pid_last_index);
>>> +		}
>>>  	}

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-02  6:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-25  8:22 [PATCH v6 0/9] IPI virtualization support for VM Zeng Guang
2022-02-25  8:22 ` [PATCH v6 1/9] x86/cpu: Add new VMX feature, Tertiary VM-Execution control Zeng Guang
2022-02-25 14:09   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-25  8:22 ` [PATCH v6 2/9] KVM: VMX: Extend BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW macro to support 64-bit variation Zeng Guang
2022-02-25 14:24   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-25  8:22 ` [PATCH v6 3/9] KVM: VMX: Detect Tertiary VM-Execution control when setup VMCS config Zeng Guang
2022-02-25 14:30   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-25  8:22 ` [PATCH v6 4/9] KVM: VMX: dump_vmcs() reports tertiary_exec_control field as well Zeng Guang
2022-02-25 14:31   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-25  8:22 ` [PATCH v6 5/9] KVM: x86: Add support for vICR APIC-write VM-Exits in x2APIC mode Zeng Guang
2022-02-25 14:44   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-25 15:29     ` Chao Gao
2022-02-25  8:22 ` [PATCH v6 6/9] KVM: x86: lapic: don't allow to change APIC ID unconditionally Zeng Guang
2022-02-25 14:46   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-25 14:56     ` David Woodhouse
2022-02-25 15:11       ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-25 15:42         ` David Woodhouse
2022-02-25 16:12           ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-01  8:03     ` Chao Gao
2022-03-08 23:04   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-09  5:21     ` Chao Gao
2022-03-09  6:01       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-09 12:59         ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-11  4:26           ` Sean Christopherson
     [not found]             ` <29c76393-4884-94a8-f224-08d313b73f71@intel.com>
2022-03-13  9:19               ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-13 10:59                 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-13 13:53                   ` Chao Gao
2022-03-13 15:09                     ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-14  4:09                       ` Chao Gao
2022-03-15 15:10                       ` Chao Gao
2022-03-15 15:30                         ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-16 11:50                           ` Chao Gao
2022-02-25  8:22 ` [PATCH v6 7/9] KVM: VMX: enable IPI virtualization Zeng Guang
2022-02-25 17:19   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-01  9:21     ` Chao Gao
2022-03-02  6:45       ` Chao Gao [this message]
2022-02-25  8:22 ` [PATCH v6 8/9] KVM: x86: Allow userspace set maximum VCPU id for VM Zeng Guang
2022-02-25 17:22   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-25  8:22 ` [PATCH v6 9/9] KVM: VMX: Optimize memory allocation for PID-pointer table Zeng Guang
2022-02-25 17:29   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-01  9:23     ` Chao Gao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220302064556.GA18820@gao-cwp \
    --to=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=guang.zeng@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=jethro@fortanix.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kim.phillips@amd.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=robert.hu@intel.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox