From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Cc: Zeng Guang <guang.zeng@intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Robert Hu <robert.hu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 7/9] KVM: VMX: enable IPI virtualization
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 14:45:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220302064556.GA18820@gao-cwp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220301092144.GA32619@gao-cwp>
>>> static void init_vmcs(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
>>> {
>>> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = &vmx->vcpu;
>>> + struct kvm_vmx *kvm_vmx = to_kvm_vmx(vcpu->kvm);
>>> +
>>> if (nested)
>>> nested_vmx_set_vmcs_shadowing_bitmap();
>>>
>>> @@ -4431,7 +4460,7 @@ static void init_vmcs(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
>>> if (cpu_has_tertiary_exec_ctrls())
>>> tertiary_exec_controls_set(vmx, vmx_tertiary_exec_control(vmx));
>>>
>>> - if (kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(&vmx->vcpu)) {
>>> + if (kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(vcpu)) {
>>
>>here too (pre-existing), I also not 100% sure that kvm_vcpu_apicv_active
>>should be used. I haven't studied APICv code that much to be 100% sure.
>
On second thoughts, I think you are correct. Below VMCS fields
(i.e, EIO_EXIT_BITMAP0/1/2, POSTED_INTR_NV/DESC_ADDR) should be configured as
long as the VM can enable APICv, particularly considering
vmx_refresh_apicv_exec_ctrl() doesn't configure these VMCS fields when APICv
gets activated.
This is a latent bug in KVM. We will fix it with a separate patch.
>I think kvm_vcpu_apicv_active is better.
>
>The question is: If CPU supports a VMX feature (APICv), but it isn't enabled
>now, is it allowed to configure VMCS fields defined by the feature? Would CPU
>ignore the values written to the fields or retain them after enabling the
>feature later?
This concern is invalid. SDM doesn't mention any ordering requirement about
configuring a feature's vm-execution bit and other VMCS fields introduced for
the feature. Please disregard my original remark.
>
>Personally, KVM shouldn't rely on CPU's behavior in this case. So, It is better
>for KVM to write below VMCS fields only if APICv is enabled.
>
>>
>>
>>> vmcs_write64(EOI_EXIT_BITMAP0, 0);
>>> vmcs_write64(EOI_EXIT_BITMAP1, 0);
>>> vmcs_write64(EOI_EXIT_BITMAP2, 0);
>>> @@ -4441,6 +4470,13 @@ static void init_vmcs(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
>>>
>>> vmcs_write16(POSTED_INTR_NV, POSTED_INTR_VECTOR);
>>> vmcs_write64(POSTED_INTR_DESC_ADDR, __pa((&vmx->pi_desc)));
>>> +
>>> + if (enable_ipiv) {
>>> + WRITE_ONCE(kvm_vmx->pid_table[vcpu->vcpu_id],
>>> + __pa(&vmx->pi_desc) | PID_TABLE_ENTRY_VALID);
>>> + vmcs_write64(PID_POINTER_TABLE, __pa(kvm_vmx->pid_table));
>>> + vmcs_write16(LAST_PID_POINTER_INDEX, kvm_vmx->pid_last_index);
>>> + }
>>> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-02 6:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-25 8:22 [PATCH v6 0/9] IPI virtualization support for VM Zeng Guang
2022-02-25 8:22 ` [PATCH v6 1/9] x86/cpu: Add new VMX feature, Tertiary VM-Execution control Zeng Guang
2022-02-25 14:09 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-25 8:22 ` [PATCH v6 2/9] KVM: VMX: Extend BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW macro to support 64-bit variation Zeng Guang
2022-02-25 14:24 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-25 8:22 ` [PATCH v6 3/9] KVM: VMX: Detect Tertiary VM-Execution control when setup VMCS config Zeng Guang
2022-02-25 14:30 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-25 8:22 ` [PATCH v6 4/9] KVM: VMX: dump_vmcs() reports tertiary_exec_control field as well Zeng Guang
2022-02-25 14:31 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-25 8:22 ` [PATCH v6 5/9] KVM: x86: Add support for vICR APIC-write VM-Exits in x2APIC mode Zeng Guang
2022-02-25 14:44 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-25 15:29 ` Chao Gao
2022-02-25 8:22 ` [PATCH v6 6/9] KVM: x86: lapic: don't allow to change APIC ID unconditionally Zeng Guang
2022-02-25 14:46 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-25 14:56 ` David Woodhouse
2022-02-25 15:11 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-25 15:42 ` David Woodhouse
2022-02-25 16:12 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-01 8:03 ` Chao Gao
2022-03-08 23:04 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-09 5:21 ` Chao Gao
2022-03-09 6:01 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-09 12:59 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-11 4:26 ` Sean Christopherson
[not found] ` <29c76393-4884-94a8-f224-08d313b73f71@intel.com>
2022-03-13 9:19 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-13 10:59 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-13 13:53 ` Chao Gao
2022-03-13 15:09 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-14 4:09 ` Chao Gao
2022-03-15 15:10 ` Chao Gao
2022-03-15 15:30 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-16 11:50 ` Chao Gao
2022-02-25 8:22 ` [PATCH v6 7/9] KVM: VMX: enable IPI virtualization Zeng Guang
2022-02-25 17:19 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-01 9:21 ` Chao Gao
2022-03-02 6:45 ` Chao Gao [this message]
2022-02-25 8:22 ` [PATCH v6 8/9] KVM: x86: Allow userspace set maximum VCPU id for VM Zeng Guang
2022-02-25 17:22 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-25 8:22 ` [PATCH v6 9/9] KVM: VMX: Optimize memory allocation for PID-pointer table Zeng Guang
2022-02-25 17:29 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-01 9:23 ` Chao Gao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220302064556.GA18820@gao-cwp \
--to=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=guang.zeng@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jethro@fortanix.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kim.phillips@amd.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=robert.hu@intel.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox