From: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com,
"moderated list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR ARM64 (KVM/arm64)"
<kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR MIPS (KVM/mips)"
<linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR MIPS (KVM/mips)"
<kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR RISC-V (KVM/riscv)"
<kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
Peter Feiner <pfeiner@google.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 14/26] KVM: x86/mmu: Decouple rmap_add() and link_shadow_page() from kvm_vcpu
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 00:25:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220311002528.2230172-15-dmatlack@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220311002528.2230172-1-dmatlack@google.com>
Allow adding new entries to the rmap and linking shadow pages without a
struct kvm_vcpu pointer by moving the implementation of rmap_add() and
link_shadow_page() into inner helper functions.
No functional change intended.
Reviewed-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index d7ad71be6c52..c57070ed157d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -725,9 +725,9 @@ static void mmu_free_memory_caches(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
kvm_mmu_free_memory_cache(&vcpu->arch.mmu_page_header_cache);
}
-static struct pte_list_desc *mmu_alloc_pte_list_desc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static struct pte_list_desc *mmu_alloc_pte_list_desc(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache)
{
- return kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc(&vcpu->arch.mmu_pte_list_desc_cache);
+ return kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc(cache);
}
static void mmu_free_pte_list_desc(struct pte_list_desc *pte_list_desc)
@@ -874,7 +874,7 @@ gfn_to_memslot_dirty_bitmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn,
/*
* Returns the number of pointers in the rmap chain, not counting the new one.
*/
-static int pte_list_add(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *spte,
+static int pte_list_add(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache, u64 *spte,
struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head)
{
struct pte_list_desc *desc;
@@ -885,7 +885,7 @@ static int pte_list_add(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *spte,
rmap_head->val = (unsigned long)spte;
} else if (!(rmap_head->val & 1)) {
rmap_printk("%p %llx 1->many\n", spte, *spte);
- desc = mmu_alloc_pte_list_desc(vcpu);
+ desc = mmu_alloc_pte_list_desc(cache);
desc->sptes[0] = (u64 *)rmap_head->val;
desc->sptes[1] = spte;
desc->spte_count = 2;
@@ -897,7 +897,7 @@ static int pte_list_add(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *spte,
while (desc->spte_count == PTE_LIST_EXT) {
count += PTE_LIST_EXT;
if (!desc->more) {
- desc->more = mmu_alloc_pte_list_desc(vcpu);
+ desc->more = mmu_alloc_pte_list_desc(cache);
desc = desc->more;
desc->spte_count = 0;
break;
@@ -1596,8 +1596,10 @@ static bool kvm_test_age_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
#define RMAP_RECYCLE_THRESHOLD 1000
-static void rmap_add(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
- u64 *spte, gfn_t gfn)
+static void __rmap_add(struct kvm *kvm,
+ struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache,
+ const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
+ u64 *spte, gfn_t gfn)
{
struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head;
@@ -1606,15 +1608,21 @@ static void rmap_add(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
sp = sptep_to_sp(spte);
kvm_mmu_page_set_gfn(sp, spte - sp->spt, gfn);
rmap_head = gfn_to_rmap(gfn, sp->role.level, slot);
- rmap_count = pte_list_add(vcpu, spte, rmap_head);
+ rmap_count = pte_list_add(cache, spte, rmap_head);
if (rmap_count > RMAP_RECYCLE_THRESHOLD) {
- kvm_unmap_rmapp(vcpu->kvm, rmap_head, NULL, gfn, sp->role.level, __pte(0));
+ kvm_unmap_rmapp(kvm, rmap_head, NULL, gfn, sp->role.level, __pte(0));
kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_with_address(
- vcpu->kvm, sp->gfn, KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(sp->role.level));
+ kvm, sp->gfn, KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(sp->role.level));
}
}
+static void rmap_add(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
+ u64 *spte, gfn_t gfn)
+{
+ __rmap_add(vcpu->kvm, &vcpu->arch.mmu_pte_list_desc_cache, slot, spte, gfn);
+}
+
bool kvm_age_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
{
bool young = false;
@@ -1682,13 +1690,13 @@ static unsigned kvm_page_table_hashfn(gfn_t gfn)
return hash_64(gfn, KVM_MMU_HASH_SHIFT);
}
-static void mmu_page_add_parent_pte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+static void mmu_page_add_parent_pte(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache,
struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, u64 *parent_pte)
{
if (!parent_pte)
return;
- pte_list_add(vcpu, parent_pte, &sp->parent_ptes);
+ pte_list_add(cache, parent_pte, &sp->parent_ptes);
}
static void mmu_page_remove_parent_pte(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
@@ -2307,8 +2315,8 @@ static void shadow_walk_next(struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator *iterator)
__shadow_walk_next(iterator, *iterator->sptep);
}
-static void link_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
- struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
+static void __link_shadow_page(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache, u64 *sptep,
+ struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
{
u64 spte;
@@ -2318,12 +2326,17 @@ static void link_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
mmu_spte_set(sptep, spte);
- mmu_page_add_parent_pte(vcpu, sp, sptep);
+ mmu_page_add_parent_pte(cache, sp, sptep);
if (sp->unsync_children || sp->unsync)
mark_unsync(sptep);
}
+static void link_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
+{
+ __link_shadow_page(&vcpu->arch.mmu_pte_list_desc_cache, sptep, sp);
+}
+
static void validate_direct_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
unsigned direct_access)
{
--
2.35.1.723.g4982287a31-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-11 0:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-11 0:25 [PATCH v2 00/26] Extend Eager Page Splitting to the shadow MMU David Matlack
2022-03-11 0:25 ` [PATCH v2 01/26] KVM: x86/mmu: Optimize MMU page cache lookup for all direct SPs David Matlack
2022-03-15 7:40 ` Peter Xu
2022-03-22 18:16 ` David Matlack
2022-03-11 0:25 ` [PATCH v2 02/26] KVM: x86/mmu: Use a bool for direct David Matlack
2022-03-15 7:46 ` Peter Xu
2022-03-22 18:21 ` David Matlack
2022-03-11 0:25 ` [PATCH v2 03/26] KVM: x86/mmu: Derive shadow MMU page role from parent David Matlack
2022-03-15 8:15 ` Peter Xu
2022-03-22 18:30 ` David Matlack
2022-03-30 14:25 ` Peter Xu
2022-03-11 0:25 ` [PATCH v2 04/26] KVM: x86/mmu: Decompose kvm_mmu_get_page() into separate functions David Matlack
2022-03-15 8:50 ` Peter Xu
2022-03-22 22:09 ` David Matlack
2022-03-11 0:25 ` [PATCH v2 05/26] KVM: x86/mmu: Rename shadow MMU functions that deal with shadow pages David Matlack
2022-03-15 8:52 ` Peter Xu
2022-03-22 21:35 ` David Matlack
2022-03-30 14:28 ` Peter Xu
2022-03-11 0:25 ` [PATCH v2 06/26] KVM: x86/mmu: Pass memslot to kvm_mmu_new_shadow_page() David Matlack
2022-03-15 9:03 ` Peter Xu
2022-03-22 22:05 ` David Matlack
2022-03-11 0:25 ` [PATCH v2 07/26] KVM: x86/mmu: Separate shadow MMU sp allocation from initialization David Matlack
2022-03-15 9:54 ` Peter Xu
2022-03-11 0:25 ` [PATCH v2 08/26] KVM: x86/mmu: Link spt to sp during allocation David Matlack
2022-03-15 10:04 ` Peter Xu
2022-03-22 22:30 ` David Matlack
2022-03-11 0:25 ` [PATCH v2 09/26] KVM: x86/mmu: Move huge page split sp allocation code to mmu.c David Matlack
2022-03-15 10:17 ` Peter Xu
2022-03-11 0:25 ` [PATCH v2 10/26] KVM: x86/mmu: Use common code to free kvm_mmu_page structs David Matlack
2022-03-15 10:22 ` Peter Xu
2022-03-22 22:33 ` David Matlack
2022-03-11 0:25 ` [PATCH v2 11/26] KVM: x86/mmu: Use common code to allocate kvm_mmu_page structs from vCPU caches David Matlack
2022-03-15 10:27 ` Peter Xu
2022-03-22 22:35 ` David Matlack
2022-03-11 0:25 ` [PATCH v2 12/26] KVM: x86/mmu: Pass const memslot to rmap_add() David Matlack
2022-03-11 0:25 ` [PATCH v2 13/26] KVM: x86/mmu: Pass const memslot to init_shadow_page() and descendants David Matlack
2022-03-11 0:25 ` David Matlack [this message]
2022-03-15 10:37 ` [PATCH v2 14/26] KVM: x86/mmu: Decouple rmap_add() and link_shadow_page() from kvm_vcpu Peter Xu
2022-03-11 0:25 ` [PATCH v2 15/26] KVM: x86/mmu: Update page stats in __rmap_add() David Matlack
2022-03-15 10:39 ` Peter Xu
2022-03-11 0:25 ` [PATCH v2 16/26] KVM: x86/mmu: Cache the access bits of shadowed translations David Matlack
2022-03-16 8:32 ` Peter Xu
2022-03-22 22:51 ` David Matlack
2022-03-30 18:30 ` Peter Xu
2022-03-31 21:40 ` David Matlack
2022-03-11 0:25 ` [PATCH v2 17/26] KVM: x86/mmu: Pass access information to make_huge_page_split_spte() David Matlack
2022-03-16 8:44 ` Peter Xu
2022-03-22 23:08 ` David Matlack
2022-03-11 0:25 ` [PATCH v2 18/26] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap collapsible SPTEs at all levels in the shadow MMU David Matlack
2022-03-16 8:49 ` Peter Xu
2022-03-22 23:11 ` David Matlack
2022-03-11 0:25 ` [PATCH v2 19/26] KVM: x86/mmu: Refactor drop_large_spte() David Matlack
2022-03-16 8:53 ` Peter Xu
2022-03-11 0:25 ` [PATCH v2 20/26] KVM: x86/mmu: Extend Eager Page Splitting to the shadow MMU David Matlack
2022-03-16 10:26 ` Peter Xu
2022-03-22 0:07 ` David Matlack
2022-03-22 23:58 ` David Matlack
2022-03-30 18:34 ` Peter Xu
2022-03-31 19:57 ` David Matlack
2022-03-11 0:25 ` [PATCH v2 21/26] KVM: Allow for different capacities in kvm_mmu_memory_cache structs David Matlack
2022-03-19 5:27 ` Anup Patel
2022-03-22 23:13 ` David Matlack
2022-03-11 0:25 ` [PATCH v2 22/26] KVM: Allow GFP flags to be passed when topping up MMU caches David Matlack
2022-03-11 0:25 ` [PATCH v2 23/26] KVM: x86/mmu: Fully split huge pages that require extra pte_list_desc structs David Matlack
2022-03-11 0:25 ` [PATCH v2 24/26] KVM: x86/mmu: Split huge pages aliased by multiple SPTEs David Matlack
2022-03-11 0:25 ` [PATCH v2 25/26] KVM: x86/mmu: Drop NULL pte_list_desc_cache fallback David Matlack
2022-03-11 0:25 ` [PATCH v2 26/26] KVM: selftests: Map x86_64 guest virtual memory with huge pages David Matlack
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220311002528.2230172-15-dmatlack@google.com \
--to=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=pfeiner@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox