From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Cc: Zeng Guang <guang.zeng@intel.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>,
"Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Hu, Robert" <robert.hu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/9] KVM: x86: lapic: don't allow to change APIC ID unconditionally
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 12:09:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220314040941.GA18296@gao-cwp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fbf929e0793a6b4df59ec9d95a018d1f6737db35.camel@redhat.com>
>> > > This won't work with nested AVIC - we can't just inhibit a nested guest using its own AVIC,
>> > > because migration happens.
>> >
>> > I mean because host decided to change its apic id, which it can in theory do any time,
>> > even after the nested guest has started. Seriously, the only reason guest has to change apic id,
>> > is to try to exploit some security hole.
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Thanks for the information.
>>
>> IIUC, you mean KVM applies APICv inhibition only to L1 VM, leaving APICv
>> enabled for L2 VM. Shouldn't KVM disable APICv for L2 VM in this case?
>> It looks like a generic issue in dynamically toggling APICv scheme,
>> e.g., qemu can set KVM_GUESTDBG_BLOCKIRQ after nested guest has started.
>>
>
>That is the problem - you can't disable it for L2, unless you are willing to emulate it in software.
>Or in other words, when nested guest uses a hardware feature, you can't at some point say to it:
>sorry buddy - hardware feature disappeared.
Agreed. I missed this.
>
>It is *currently* not a problem for APICv because it doesn't do IPI virtualization,
>and even with these patches, it doesn't do this for nesting.
>It does become when you allow nested guest to use this which I did in the nested AVIC code.
>
>
>and writable apic ids do pose a large problem, since nested AVIC, will target L1's apic ids,
>and when they can change under you without any notice, and even worse be duplicate,
>it is just nightmare.
OK. So the problem of disabling APICv is if we choose to disable APICv instead
of making APIC ID read-only, although it can work perfectly for VMX IPIv, it
effectively makes future cleanup to AVIC difficult/impossible because nested
AVIC is practically to implement without assuming APIC IDs of L1 is immutable.
Sean & Maxim
How about go back to use a module parameter to opt in to read-only APIC ID.
Although migration in some cases may fail but it shouldn't be a big issue as
migration VMs from a KVM with nested=on to a KVM with nested=off may also fail.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-14 3:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-25 8:22 [PATCH v6 0/9] IPI virtualization support for VM Zeng Guang
2022-02-25 8:22 ` [PATCH v6 1/9] x86/cpu: Add new VMX feature, Tertiary VM-Execution control Zeng Guang
2022-02-25 14:09 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-25 8:22 ` [PATCH v6 2/9] KVM: VMX: Extend BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW macro to support 64-bit variation Zeng Guang
2022-02-25 14:24 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-25 8:22 ` [PATCH v6 3/9] KVM: VMX: Detect Tertiary VM-Execution control when setup VMCS config Zeng Guang
2022-02-25 14:30 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-25 8:22 ` [PATCH v6 4/9] KVM: VMX: dump_vmcs() reports tertiary_exec_control field as well Zeng Guang
2022-02-25 14:31 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-25 8:22 ` [PATCH v6 5/9] KVM: x86: Add support for vICR APIC-write VM-Exits in x2APIC mode Zeng Guang
2022-02-25 14:44 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-25 15:29 ` Chao Gao
2022-02-25 8:22 ` [PATCH v6 6/9] KVM: x86: lapic: don't allow to change APIC ID unconditionally Zeng Guang
2022-02-25 14:46 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-25 14:56 ` David Woodhouse
2022-02-25 15:11 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-25 15:42 ` David Woodhouse
2022-02-25 16:12 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-01 8:03 ` Chao Gao
2022-03-08 23:04 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-09 5:21 ` Chao Gao
2022-03-09 6:01 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-09 12:59 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-11 4:26 ` Sean Christopherson
[not found] ` <29c76393-4884-94a8-f224-08d313b73f71@intel.com>
2022-03-13 9:19 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-13 10:59 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-13 13:53 ` Chao Gao
2022-03-13 15:09 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-14 4:09 ` Chao Gao [this message]
2022-03-15 15:10 ` Chao Gao
2022-03-15 15:30 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-16 11:50 ` Chao Gao
2022-02-25 8:22 ` [PATCH v6 7/9] KVM: VMX: enable IPI virtualization Zeng Guang
2022-02-25 17:19 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-01 9:21 ` Chao Gao
2022-03-02 6:45 ` Chao Gao
2022-02-25 8:22 ` [PATCH v6 8/9] KVM: x86: Allow userspace set maximum VCPU id for VM Zeng Guang
2022-02-25 17:22 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-25 8:22 ` [PATCH v6 9/9] KVM: VMX: Optimize memory allocation for PID-pointer table Zeng Guang
2022-02-25 17:29 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-01 9:23 ` Chao Gao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220314040941.GA18296@gao-cwp \
--to=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=guang.zeng@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jethro@fortanix.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kim.phillips@amd.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=robert.hu@intel.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox