public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	seanjc@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] KVM: x86: allow defining return-0 static calls
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 18:28:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220318172837.GQ8939@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1dc56110-5f1b-6140-937c-bf4a28ddbe87@redhat.com>

On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 05:29:20PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 3/17/22 18:43, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-ops.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-ops.h
> > index 20f64e07e359..3388072b2e3b 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-ops.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-ops.h
> > @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ KVM_X86_OP(deliver_interrupt)
> >   KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL(sync_pir_to_irr)
> >   KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL_RET0(set_tss_addr)
> >   KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL_RET0(set_identity_map_addr)
> > -KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL_RET0(get_mt_mask)
> > +KVM_X86_OP(get_mt_mask)
> >   KVM_X86_OP(load_mmu_pgd)
> >   KVM_X86_OP(has_wbinvd_exit)
> >   KVM_X86_OP(get_l2_tsc_offset)
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> > index a09b4f1a18f6..0c09292b0611 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> > @@ -4057,6 +4057,11 @@ static bool svm_has_emulated_msr(struct kvm *kvm, u32 index)
> >          return true;
> >   }
> > +static u64 svm_get_mt_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn, bool is_mmio)
> > +{
> > +       return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >   static void svm_vcpu_after_set_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >   {
> >          struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
> > @@ -4718,6 +4723,7 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops __initdata = {
> >          .check_apicv_inhibit_reasons = avic_check_apicv_inhibit_reasons,
> >          .apicv_post_state_restore = avic_apicv_post_state_restore,
> > +       .get_mt_mask = svm_get_mt_mask,
> >          .get_exit_info = svm_get_exit_info,
> >          .vcpu_after_set_cpuid = svm_vcpu_after_set_cpuid,
> 
> Thanks, I'll send it as a complete patch.  Please reply there with your
> Signed-off-by.

Yeah, ret0 should only be used with up-to 'long' return values.

So ACK on that patch.

> Related to this, I don't see anything in arch/x86/kernel/static_call.c that
> limits this code to x86-64:
> 
>                 if (func == &__static_call_return0) {
>                         emulate = code;
>                         code = &xor5rax;
>                 }
> 
> 
> On 32-bit, it will be patched as "dec ax; xor eax, eax" or something like
> that.  Fortunately it doesn't corrupt any callee-save register but it is not
> just a bit funky, it's also not a single instruction.

Urggghh.. that's fairly yuck. So there's two options I suppose:

	0x66, 0x66, 0x66, 0x31, 0xc0

Which is a tripple prefix xor %eax, %eax, which, IIRC should still clear
the whole 64bit on 64bit and *should* still not trigger the prefix
decoding penalty some frontends have (which is >3 IIRC).

Or we can emit:

	0xb8, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00

which decodes to: mov $0x0,%eax, which is less efficient in some
front-ends since it doesn't always get picked up in register rename
stage.



  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-18 17:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-17 18:08 [PATCH v3 0/6] kvm: x86: better handling of optional kvm_x86_ops Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-17 18:08 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] KVM: x86: return 1 unconditionally for availability of KVM_CAP_VAPIC Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 15:44   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-23 13:21   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-02-17 18:08 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] KVM: x86: use static_call_cond for optional callbacks Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 15:46   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-17 18:08 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] KVM: x86: remove KVM_X86_OP_NULL and mark optional kvm_x86_ops Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 15:52   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-17 18:08 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] KVM: x86: warn on incorrectly NULL members of kvm_x86_ops Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 16:18   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-17 18:08 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] KVM: x86: make several AVIC callbacks optional Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 16:23   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-18 17:17     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 17:37       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-18 17:41         ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-17 18:08 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] KVM: x86: allow defining return-0 static calls Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 16:29   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-18 17:20     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-18 17:33       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-17 17:43   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-17 22:30     ` David Laight
2022-03-18 16:29     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-18 17:28       ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2022-03-18 17:47         ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-18 18:02           ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-18 23:03             ` David Laight
2022-03-20 13:58       ` Maxim Levitsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220318172837.GQ8939@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox