From: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: frankja@linux.ibm.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com,
david@redhat.com, farman@linux.ibm.com
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 9/9] s390x: stsi: check zero and ignored bits in r0 and r1
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 11:19:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220321101904.387640-10-nrb@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220321101904.387640-1-nrb@linux.ibm.com>
We previously only checked for two zero bits, one in r0 and one in r1.
Let's check all the bits which must be zero and which are ignored
to extend the coverage.
Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
---
s390x/stsi.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/s390x/stsi.c b/s390x/stsi.c
index dccc53e7a816..94a579dc3b58 100644
--- a/s390x/stsi.c
+++ b/s390x/stsi.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
*/
#include <libcflat.h>
+#include <bitops.h>
#include <asm/page.h>
#include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
#include <asm/interrupt.h>
@@ -19,19 +20,40 @@ static uint8_t pagebuf[PAGE_SIZE * 2] __attribute__((aligned(PAGE_SIZE * 2)));
static void test_specs(void)
{
+ int i;
+ int cc;
+
report_prefix_push("specification");
- report_prefix_push("inv r0");
- expect_pgm_int();
- stsi(pagebuf, 0, 1 << 8, 0);
- check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_SPECIFICATION);
- report_prefix_pop();
+ for (i = 36; i <= 55; i++) {
+ report_prefix_pushf("set invalid r0 bit %d", i);
+ expect_pgm_int();
+ stsi(pagebuf, 0, BIT(63 - i), 0);
+ check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_SPECIFICATION);
+ report_prefix_pop();
+ }
- report_prefix_push("inv r1");
- expect_pgm_int();
- stsi(pagebuf, 1, 0, 1 << 16);
- check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_SPECIFICATION);
- report_prefix_pop();
+ for (i = 32; i <= 47; i++) {
+ report_prefix_pushf("set invalid r1 bit %d", i);
+ expect_pgm_int();
+ stsi(pagebuf, 1, 0, BIT(63 - i));
+ check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_SPECIFICATION);
+ report_prefix_pop();
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
+ report_prefix_pushf("r0 bit %d ignored", i);
+ cc = stsi(pagebuf, 3, 2 | BIT(63 - i), 2);
+ report(!cc, "CC = 0");
+ report_prefix_pop();
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
+ report_prefix_pushf("r1 bit %d ignored", i);
+ cc = stsi(pagebuf, 3, 2, 2 | BIT(63 - i));
+ report(!cc, "CC = 0");
+ report_prefix_pop();
+ }
report_prefix_push("unaligned");
expect_pgm_int();
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-21 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-21 10:18 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 0/9] s390x: Further extend instruction interception tests Nico Boehr
2022-03-21 10:18 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 1/9] s390x: smp: add tests for several invalid SIGP orders Nico Boehr
2022-03-21 10:18 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 2/9] s390x: smp: stop already stopped CPU Nico Boehr
2022-03-21 10:18 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 3/9] s390x: gs: move to new header file Nico Boehr
2022-03-21 10:18 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 4/9] s390x: smp: add test for SIGP_STORE_ADTL_STATUS order Nico Boehr
2022-03-21 14:59 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-03-23 14:19 ` Nico Boehr
2022-03-23 15:47 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-03-21 10:19 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 5/9] s390x: smp: add tests for SET_PREFIX Nico Boehr
2022-03-21 10:19 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 6/9] s390x: smp: add test for EMERGENCY_SIGNAL with invalid CPU address Nico Boehr
2022-03-21 10:19 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 7/9] s390x: smp: add tests for CONDITIONAL EMERGENCY Nico Boehr
2022-03-21 10:19 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 8/9] s390x: add TPROT tests Nico Boehr
2022-03-21 10:19 ` Nico Boehr [this message]
2022-03-21 15:01 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 0/9] s390x: Further extend instruction interception tests Claudio Imbrenda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220321101904.387640-10-nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox