From: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: frankja@linux.ibm.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com,
david@redhat.com, farman@linux.ibm.com
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 5/9] s390x: smp: add tests for SET_PREFIX
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 11:19:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220321101904.387640-6-nrb@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220321101904.387640-1-nrb@linux.ibm.com>
We cover the following cases:
- running CPU
- illegal CPU id
The order should be rejected in both cases.
Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
---
s390x/smp.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 73 insertions(+)
diff --git a/s390x/smp.c b/s390x/smp.c
index 5d3265f6be64..f22520b4f4fc 100644
--- a/s390x/smp.c
+++ b/s390x/smp.c
@@ -51,6 +51,8 @@ static uint8_t expected_vec_contents[NUM_VEC_REGISTERS][VEC_REGISTER_SIZE];
static struct gs_cb gs_cb;
static struct gs_epl gs_epl;
+static uint32_t cpu1_prefix;
+
static void test_invalid(void)
{
const struct sigp_invalid_cases *c;
@@ -455,6 +457,76 @@ out:
report_prefix_pop();
}
+static void loop(void)
+{
+ while (1)
+ ;
+}
+
+static void stpx_and_set_flag(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ " stpx %[prefix]\n"
+ : [prefix] "=Q" (cpu1_prefix)
+ :
+ :
+ );
+
+ set_flag(1);
+}
+
+static void test_set_prefix(void)
+{
+ struct lowcore *new_lc = alloc_pages_flags(1, AREA_DMA31);
+ struct cpu *cpu1 = smp_cpu_from_idx(1);
+ uint32_t status = 0;
+ struct psw new_psw;
+ int cc;
+
+ report_prefix_push("set prefix");
+
+ assert(new_lc);
+
+ memcpy(new_lc, cpu1->lowcore, sizeof(struct lowcore));
+ new_lc->restart_new_psw.addr = (unsigned long)loop;
+
+ report_prefix_push("running");
+ set_flag(0);
+ new_psw.addr = (unsigned long)stpx_and_set_flag;
+ new_psw.mask = extract_psw_mask();
+ smp_cpu_start(1, new_psw);
+ wait_for_flag();
+ cpu1_prefix = 0xFFFFFFFF;
+
+ cc = smp_sigp(1, SIGP_SET_PREFIX, (unsigned long)new_lc, &status);
+ report(cc == 1, "CC = 1");
+ report(status == SIGP_STATUS_INCORRECT_STATE, "status = INCORRECT_STATE");
+
+ /*
+ * If the prefix of the other CPU was changed it will enter an endless
+ * loop. Otherwise, it should eventually set the flag.
+ */
+ smp_cpu_stop(1);
+ set_flag(0);
+ smp_cpu_restart(1);
+ wait_for_flag();
+ report(cpu1_prefix == (uint64_t)cpu1->lowcore, "prefix unchanged");
+
+ report_prefix_pop();
+
+ report_prefix_push("invalid CPU address");
+
+ cc = sigp(INVALID_CPU_ADDRESS, SIGP_SET_PREFIX, (unsigned long)new_lc, &status);
+ report(cc == 3, "CC = 3");
+
+ report_prefix_pop();
+
+ free_pages(new_lc);
+
+ report_prefix_pop();
+
+}
+
static void ecall(void)
{
unsigned long mask;
@@ -647,6 +719,7 @@ int main(void)
test_store_adtl_status_vector();
test_store_adtl_status_gs();
test_store_adtl_status();
+ test_set_prefix();
test_ecall();
test_emcall();
test_sense_running();
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-21 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-21 10:18 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 0/9] s390x: Further extend instruction interception tests Nico Boehr
2022-03-21 10:18 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 1/9] s390x: smp: add tests for several invalid SIGP orders Nico Boehr
2022-03-21 10:18 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 2/9] s390x: smp: stop already stopped CPU Nico Boehr
2022-03-21 10:18 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 3/9] s390x: gs: move to new header file Nico Boehr
2022-03-21 10:18 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 4/9] s390x: smp: add test for SIGP_STORE_ADTL_STATUS order Nico Boehr
2022-03-21 14:59 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-03-23 14:19 ` Nico Boehr
2022-03-23 15:47 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-03-21 10:19 ` Nico Boehr [this message]
2022-03-21 10:19 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 6/9] s390x: smp: add test for EMERGENCY_SIGNAL with invalid CPU address Nico Boehr
2022-03-21 10:19 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 7/9] s390x: smp: add tests for CONDITIONAL EMERGENCY Nico Boehr
2022-03-21 10:19 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 8/9] s390x: add TPROT tests Nico Boehr
2022-03-21 10:19 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 9/9] s390x: stsi: check zero and ignored bits in r0 and r1 Nico Boehr
2022-03-21 15:01 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1 0/9] s390x: Further extend instruction interception tests Claudio Imbrenda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220321101904.387640-6-nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox