From: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com,
"moderated list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR ARM64 (KVM/arm64)"
<kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR MIPS (KVM/mips)"
<linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR MIPS (KVM/mips)"
<kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR RISC-V (KVM/riscv)"
<kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
Peter Feiner <pfeiner@google.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 14/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Decouple rmap_add() and link_shadow_page() from kvm_vcpu
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 17:55:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220401175554.1931568-15-dmatlack@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220401175554.1931568-1-dmatlack@google.com>
Allow adding new entries to the rmap and linking shadow pages without a
struct kvm_vcpu pointer by moving the implementation of rmap_add() and
link_shadow_page() into inner helper functions.
No functional change intended.
Reviewed-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 39d9cccbdc7e..7305a8c625c0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -725,11 +725,6 @@ static void mmu_free_memory_caches(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
kvm_mmu_free_memory_cache(&vcpu->arch.mmu_page_header_cache);
}
-static struct pte_list_desc *mmu_alloc_pte_list_desc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
-{
- return kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc(&vcpu->arch.mmu_pte_list_desc_cache);
-}
-
static void mmu_free_pte_list_desc(struct pte_list_desc *pte_list_desc)
{
kmem_cache_free(pte_list_desc_cache, pte_list_desc);
@@ -874,7 +869,7 @@ gfn_to_memslot_dirty_bitmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn,
/*
* Returns the number of pointers in the rmap chain, not counting the new one.
*/
-static int pte_list_add(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *spte,
+static int pte_list_add(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache, u64 *spte,
struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head)
{
struct pte_list_desc *desc;
@@ -885,7 +880,7 @@ static int pte_list_add(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *spte,
rmap_head->val = (unsigned long)spte;
} else if (!(rmap_head->val & 1)) {
rmap_printk("%p %llx 1->many\n", spte, *spte);
- desc = mmu_alloc_pte_list_desc(vcpu);
+ desc = kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc(cache);
desc->sptes[0] = (u64 *)rmap_head->val;
desc->sptes[1] = spte;
desc->spte_count = 2;
@@ -897,7 +892,7 @@ static int pte_list_add(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *spte,
while (desc->spte_count == PTE_LIST_EXT) {
count += PTE_LIST_EXT;
if (!desc->more) {
- desc->more = mmu_alloc_pte_list_desc(vcpu);
+ desc->more = kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc(cache);
desc = desc->more;
desc->spte_count = 0;
break;
@@ -1596,8 +1591,10 @@ static bool kvm_test_age_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
#define RMAP_RECYCLE_THRESHOLD 1000
-static void rmap_add(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
- u64 *spte, gfn_t gfn)
+static void __rmap_add(struct kvm *kvm,
+ struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache,
+ const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
+ u64 *spte, gfn_t gfn)
{
struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head;
@@ -1606,15 +1603,21 @@ static void rmap_add(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
sp = sptep_to_sp(spte);
kvm_mmu_page_set_gfn(sp, spte - sp->spt, gfn);
rmap_head = gfn_to_rmap(gfn, sp->role.level, slot);
- rmap_count = pte_list_add(vcpu, spte, rmap_head);
+ rmap_count = pte_list_add(cache, spte, rmap_head);
if (rmap_count > RMAP_RECYCLE_THRESHOLD) {
- kvm_unmap_rmapp(vcpu->kvm, rmap_head, NULL, gfn, sp->role.level, __pte(0));
+ kvm_unmap_rmapp(kvm, rmap_head, NULL, gfn, sp->role.level, __pte(0));
kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_with_address(
- vcpu->kvm, sp->gfn, KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(sp->role.level));
+ kvm, sp->gfn, KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(sp->role.level));
}
}
+static void rmap_add(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
+ u64 *spte, gfn_t gfn)
+{
+ __rmap_add(vcpu->kvm, &vcpu->arch.mmu_pte_list_desc_cache, slot, spte, gfn);
+}
+
bool kvm_age_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
{
bool young = false;
@@ -1682,13 +1685,13 @@ static unsigned kvm_page_table_hashfn(gfn_t gfn)
return hash_64(gfn, KVM_MMU_HASH_SHIFT);
}
-static void mmu_page_add_parent_pte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+static void mmu_page_add_parent_pte(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache,
struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, u64 *parent_pte)
{
if (!parent_pte)
return;
- pte_list_add(vcpu, parent_pte, &sp->parent_ptes);
+ pte_list_add(cache, parent_pte, &sp->parent_ptes);
}
static void mmu_page_remove_parent_pte(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
@@ -2304,8 +2307,8 @@ static void shadow_walk_next(struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator *iterator)
__shadow_walk_next(iterator, *iterator->sptep);
}
-static void link_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
- struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
+static void __link_shadow_page(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache, u64 *sptep,
+ struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
{
u64 spte;
@@ -2315,12 +2318,17 @@ static void link_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
mmu_spte_set(sptep, spte);
- mmu_page_add_parent_pte(vcpu, sp, sptep);
+ mmu_page_add_parent_pte(cache, sp, sptep);
if (sp->unsync_children || sp->unsync)
mark_unsync(sptep);
}
+static void link_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
+{
+ __link_shadow_page(&vcpu->arch.mmu_pte_list_desc_cache, sptep, sp);
+}
+
static void validate_direct_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
unsigned direct_access)
{
--
2.35.1.1094.g7c7d902a7c-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-01 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-01 17:55 [PATCH v3 00/23] KVM: Extend Eager Page Splitting to the shadow MMU David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 01/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Optimize MMU page cache lookup for all direct SPs David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 02/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Use a bool for direct David Matlack
2022-04-08 22:24 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 03/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Derive shadow MMU page role from parent David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 04/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Decompose kvm_mmu_get_page() into separate functions David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 05/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Rename shadow MMU functions that deal with shadow pages David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 06/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Pass memslot to kvm_mmu_new_shadow_page() David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 07/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Separate shadow MMU sp allocation from initialization David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 08/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Link spt to sp during allocation David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 09/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Move huge page split sp allocation code to mmu.c David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 10/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Use common code to free kvm_mmu_page structs David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 11/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Use common code to allocate shadow pages from vCPU caches David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 12/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Pass const memslot to rmap_add() David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 13/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Pass const memslot to init_shadow_page() and descendants David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` David Matlack [this message]
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 15/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Update page stats in __rmap_add() David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 16/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Cache the access bits of shadowed translations David Matlack
2022-04-09 0:02 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-14 16:47 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 17/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Extend make_huge_page_split_spte() for the shadow MMU David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 18/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap collapsible SPTEs at all levels in " David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 19/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Refactor drop_large_spte() David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 20/23] KVM: Allow for different capacities in kvm_mmu_memory_cache structs David Matlack
2022-04-20 10:55 ` Anup Patel
2022-04-21 16:19 ` Ben Gardon
2022-04-21 16:33 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 21/23] KVM: Allow GFP flags to be passed when topping up MMU caches David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 22/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Support Eager Page Splitting in the shadow MMU David Matlack
2022-04-09 0:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-14 16:50 ` David Matlack
2022-04-01 17:55 ` [PATCH v3 23/23] KVM: selftests: Map x86_64 guest virtual memory with huge pages David Matlack
2022-04-11 17:12 ` [PATCH v3 00/23] KVM: Extend Eager Page Splitting to the shadow MMU Sean Christopherson
2022-04-11 17:54 ` David Matlack
2022-04-11 20:12 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-11 23:41 ` David Matlack
2022-04-12 0:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-12 16:49 ` David Matlack
2022-04-13 1:02 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-13 17:57 ` David Matlack
2022-04-13 18:28 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-13 21:22 ` David Matlack
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220401175554.1931568-15-dmatlack@google.com \
--to=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=pfeiner@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox