From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] vfio: Require that devices support DMA cache coherence
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 10:37:12 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220408133712.GY2120790@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d6b1c72b-c05e-8bd8-c0cb-38e6c7ccfdb6@arm.com>
On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 02:28:02PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > > One nit. Is it logistically more reasonable to put this patch before
> > > changing VFIO to always set IOMMU_CACHE?
> >
> > For bisectability it has to be after
> >
> > iommu: Redefine IOMMU_CAP_CACHE_COHERENCY as the cap flag for IOMMU_CACHE
> >
> > Otherwise Intel iommu will stop working with VFIO
> >
> > The ordering is OK as is because no IOMMU that works with VFIO cares
> > about IOMMU_CACHE.
>
> The Arm SMMU drivers do (without it even coherent traffic would be
> downgraded to non-cacheable), but then they also handle
> IOMMU_CAP_CACHE_COHERENCY nonsensically, and it happens to work out since
> AFAIK there aren't (yet) any Arm-based systems where you can reasonably try
> to use VFIO that don't also have hardware-coherent PCI. Thus I don't think
> there's any risk of regression for us here.
Right, I was unclear, I meant 'requires IOMMU_CACHE to be unset to
work with VFIO'
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-08 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-07 15:23 [PATCH v2 0/4] Make the iommu driver no-snoop block feature consistent Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-07 15:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] iommu: Introduce the domain op enforce_cache_coherency() Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-08 8:05 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-04-09 12:44 ` Lu Baolu
2022-04-11 14:11 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-08 8:27 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-04-07 15:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] vfio: Move the Intel no-snoop control off of IOMMU_CACHE Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-08 8:16 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-04-09 12:50 ` Lu Baolu
2022-04-12 7:44 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-04-12 13:13 ` Lu Baolu
2022-04-12 13:20 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-12 23:04 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-04-13 11:37 ` Lu Baolu
2022-04-08 15:47 ` Alex Williamson
2022-04-11 14:13 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-07 15:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] iommu: Redefine IOMMU_CAP_CACHE_COHERENCY as the cap flag for IOMMU_CACHE Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-08 8:21 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-04-08 12:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-09 12:51 ` Lu Baolu
2022-04-07 15:23 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] vfio: Require that devices support DMA cache coherence Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-08 8:26 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-04-08 12:22 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-08 13:28 ` Robin Murphy
2022-04-08 13:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2022-04-08 15:48 ` Alex Williamson
2022-07-01 4:57 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2022-07-01 6:07 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-07-01 6:24 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2022-04-07 17:03 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Make the iommu driver no-snoop block feature consistent Robin Murphy
2022-04-07 17:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-07 18:02 ` Robin Murphy
2022-04-07 19:08 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-07 19:27 ` Robin Murphy
2022-04-08 12:18 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-08 13:11 ` Robin Murphy
2022-04-08 13:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-08 17:44 ` Robin Murphy
2022-04-12 2:51 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-04-08 9:08 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-04-08 10:11 ` Robin Murphy
2022-04-12 2:49 ` Tian, Kevin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220408133712.GY2120790@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox