public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] vfio: Move the Intel no-snoop control off of IOMMU_CACHE
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 11:13:33 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220411141333.GB4085842@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220408094757.4f5765c8.alex.williamson@redhat.com>

On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 09:47:57AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:

> > Ultimately VFIO plumbs the result of enforce_cache_coherency() back into
> > the x86 platform code through kvm_arch_register_noncoherent_dma() which
> > controls if the WBINVD instruction is available in the guest. No other
> > arch implements kvm_arch_register_noncoherent_dma().
> 
> I think this last sentence is alluding to it, but I wish the user
> visible change to VFIO_DMA_CC_IOMMU on non-x86 were more explicit.
> Perhaps for the last sentence:
> 
>   No other archs implement kvm_arch_register_noncoherent_dma() nor are
>   there any other known consumers of VFIO_DMA_CC_IOMMU that might be
>   affected by the user visible result change on non-x86 archs.

Done

Thanks,
Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-11 14:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-07 15:23 [PATCH v2 0/4] Make the iommu driver no-snoop block feature consistent Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-07 15:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] iommu: Introduce the domain op enforce_cache_coherency() Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-08  8:05   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-04-09 12:44     ` Lu Baolu
2022-04-11 14:11     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-08  8:27   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-04-07 15:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] vfio: Move the Intel no-snoop control off of IOMMU_CACHE Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-08  8:16   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-04-09 12:50     ` Lu Baolu
2022-04-12  7:44       ` Tian, Kevin
2022-04-12 13:13         ` Lu Baolu
2022-04-12 13:20           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-12 23:04             ` Tian, Kevin
2022-04-13 11:37               ` Lu Baolu
2022-04-08 15:47   ` Alex Williamson
2022-04-11 14:13     ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2022-04-07 15:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] iommu: Redefine IOMMU_CAP_CACHE_COHERENCY as the cap flag for IOMMU_CACHE Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-08  8:21   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-04-08 12:21     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-09 12:51   ` Lu Baolu
2022-04-07 15:23 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] vfio: Require that devices support DMA cache coherence Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-08  8:26   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-04-08 12:22     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-08 13:28       ` Robin Murphy
2022-04-08 13:37         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-08 15:48   ` Alex Williamson
2022-07-01  4:57   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2022-07-01  6:07     ` Tian, Kevin
2022-07-01  6:24       ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2022-04-07 17:03 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Make the iommu driver no-snoop block feature consistent Robin Murphy
2022-04-07 17:43   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-07 18:02     ` Robin Murphy
2022-04-07 19:08       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-07 19:27         ` Robin Murphy
2022-04-08 12:18           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-08 13:11             ` Robin Murphy
2022-04-08 13:35               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-08 17:44                 ` Robin Murphy
2022-04-12  2:51                   ` Tian, Kevin
2022-04-08  9:08         ` Tian, Kevin
2022-04-08 10:11           ` Robin Murphy
2022-04-12  2:49             ` Tian, Kevin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220411141333.GB4085842@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox