* [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 1/3] s390x: Give name to return value of tprot()
2022-05-02 15:40 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 0/3] s390x: Test effect of storage keys on some instructions Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
@ 2022-05-02 15:40 ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-05-04 13:23 ` Thomas Huth
2022-05-02 15:41 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 2/3] s390x: Test effect of storage keys on some instructions Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch @ 2022-05-02 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Huth, Janosch Frank, Claudio Imbrenda
Cc: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch, David Hildenbrand, kvm, linux-s390
Improve readability by making the return value of tprot() an enum.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
---
lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h | 11 +++++++++--
lib/s390x/sclp.c | 6 +++---
s390x/tprot.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
index bab3c374..46c370e6 100644
--- a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
+++ b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
@@ -228,7 +228,14 @@ static inline uint64_t stidp(void)
return cpuid;
}
-static inline int tprot(unsigned long addr, char access_key)
+enum tprot_permission {
+ TPROT_READ_WRITE = 0,
+ TPROT_READ = 1,
+ TPROT_RW_PROTECTED = 2,
+ TPROT_TRANSL_UNAVAIL = 3,
+};
+
+static inline enum tprot_permission tprot(unsigned long addr, char access_key)
{
int cc;
@@ -237,7 +244,7 @@ static inline int tprot(unsigned long addr, char access_key)
" ipm %0\n"
" srl %0,28\n"
: "=d" (cc) : "a" (addr), "a" (access_key << 4) : "cc");
- return cc;
+ return (enum tprot_permission)cc;
}
static inline void lctlg(int cr, uint64_t value)
diff --git a/lib/s390x/sclp.c b/lib/s390x/sclp.c
index 33985eb4..b8204c5f 100644
--- a/lib/s390x/sclp.c
+++ b/lib/s390x/sclp.c
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ int sclp_service_call(unsigned int command, void *sccb)
void sclp_memory_setup(void)
{
uint64_t rnmax, rnsize;
- int cc;
+ enum tprot_permission permission;
assert(read_info);
@@ -222,9 +222,9 @@ void sclp_memory_setup(void)
/* probe for r/w memory up to max memory size */
while (ram_size < max_ram_size) {
expect_pgm_int();
- cc = tprot(ram_size + storage_increment_size - 1, 0);
+ permission = tprot(ram_size + storage_increment_size - 1, 0);
/* stop once we receive an exception or have protected memory */
- if (clear_pgm_int() || cc != 0)
+ if (clear_pgm_int() || permission != TPROT_READ_WRITE)
break;
ram_size += storage_increment_size;
}
diff --git a/s390x/tprot.c b/s390x/tprot.c
index 460a0db7..8eb91c18 100644
--- a/s390x/tprot.c
+++ b/s390x/tprot.c
@@ -20,26 +20,26 @@ static uint8_t pagebuf[PAGE_SIZE] __attribute__((aligned(PAGE_SIZE)));
static void test_tprot_rw(void)
{
- int cc;
+ enum tprot_permission permission;
report_prefix_push("Page read/writeable");
- cc = tprot((unsigned long)pagebuf, 0);
- report(cc == 0, "CC = 0");
+ permission = tprot((unsigned long)pagebuf, 0);
+ report(permission == TPROT_READ_WRITE, "CC = 0");
report_prefix_pop();
}
static void test_tprot_ro(void)
{
- int cc;
+ enum tprot_permission permission;
report_prefix_push("Page readonly");
protect_dat_entry(pagebuf, PAGE_ENTRY_P, 5);
- cc = tprot((unsigned long)pagebuf, 0);
- report(cc == 1, "CC = 1");
+ permission = tprot((unsigned long)pagebuf, 0);
+ report(permission == TPROT_READ, "CC = 1");
unprotect_dat_entry(pagebuf, PAGE_ENTRY_P, 5);
@@ -48,28 +48,28 @@ static void test_tprot_ro(void)
static void test_tprot_low_addr_prot(void)
{
- int cc;
+ enum tprot_permission permission;
report_prefix_push("low-address protection");
low_prot_enable();
- cc = tprot(0, 0);
+ permission = tprot(0, 0);
low_prot_disable();
- report(cc == 1, "CC = 1");
+ report(permission == TPROT_READ, "CC = 1");
report_prefix_pop();
}
static void test_tprot_transl_unavail(void)
{
- int cc;
+ enum tprot_permission permission;
report_prefix_push("Page translation unavailable");
protect_dat_entry(pagebuf, PAGE_ENTRY_I, 5);
- cc = tprot((unsigned long)pagebuf, 0);
- report(cc == 3, "CC = 3");
+ permission = tprot((unsigned long)pagebuf, 0);
+ report(permission == TPROT_TRANSL_UNAVAIL, "CC = 3");
unprotect_dat_entry(pagebuf, PAGE_ENTRY_I, 5);
--
2.33.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 1/3] s390x: Give name to return value of tprot()
2022-05-02 15:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 1/3] s390x: Give name to return value of tprot() Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
@ 2022-05-04 13:23 ` Thomas Huth
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Huth @ 2022-05-04 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch, Janosch Frank, Claudio Imbrenda
Cc: David Hildenbrand, kvm, linux-s390
On 02/05/2022 17.40, Janis Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
> Improve readability by making the return value of tprot() an enum.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h | 11 +++++++++--
> lib/s390x/sclp.c | 6 +++---
> s390x/tprot.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
> 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
Looks fine!
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 2/3] s390x: Test effect of storage keys on some instructions
2022-05-02 15:40 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 0/3] s390x: Test effect of storage keys on some instructions Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-05-02 15:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 1/3] s390x: Give name to return value of tprot() Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
@ 2022-05-02 15:41 ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-05-04 12:46 ` Janosch Frank
2022-05-04 13:29 ` Thomas Huth
2022-05-02 15:41 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 3/3] Disable s390x skey test in GitLab CI Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-05-05 13:16 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 0/3] s390x: Test effect of storage keys on some instructions Claudio Imbrenda
3 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch @ 2022-05-02 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Huth, Janosch Frank, Claudio Imbrenda
Cc: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch, David Hildenbrand, kvm, linux-s390
Some instructions are emulated by KVM. Test that KVM correctly emulates
storage key checking for two of those instructions (STORE CPU ADDRESS,
SET PREFIX).
Test success and error conditions, including coverage of storage and
fetch protection override.
Also add test for TEST PROTECTION, even if that instruction will not be
emulated by KVM under normal conditions.
Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>
---
lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h | 20 ++--
s390x/skey.c | 249 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 260 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
index 46c370e6..72553819 100644
--- a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
+++ b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
@@ -55,15 +55,17 @@ struct psw {
#define PSW_MASK_BA 0x0000000080000000UL
#define PSW_MASK_64 (PSW_MASK_BA | PSW_MASK_EA)
-#define CTL0_LOW_ADDR_PROT (63 - 35)
-#define CTL0_EDAT (63 - 40)
-#define CTL0_IEP (63 - 43)
-#define CTL0_AFP (63 - 45)
-#define CTL0_VECTOR (63 - 46)
-#define CTL0_EMERGENCY_SIGNAL (63 - 49)
-#define CTL0_EXTERNAL_CALL (63 - 50)
-#define CTL0_CLOCK_COMPARATOR (63 - 52)
-#define CTL0_SERVICE_SIGNAL (63 - 54)
+#define CTL0_LOW_ADDR_PROT (63 - 35)
+#define CTL0_EDAT (63 - 40)
+#define CTL0_FETCH_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE (63 - 38)
+#define CTL0_STORAGE_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE (63 - 39)
+#define CTL0_IEP (63 - 43)
+#define CTL0_AFP (63 - 45)
+#define CTL0_VECTOR (63 - 46)
+#define CTL0_EMERGENCY_SIGNAL (63 - 49)
+#define CTL0_EXTERNAL_CALL (63 - 50)
+#define CTL0_CLOCK_COMPARATOR (63 - 52)
+#define CTL0_SERVICE_SIGNAL (63 - 54)
#define CR0_EXTM_MASK 0x0000000000006200UL /* Combined external masks */
#define CTL2_GUARDED_STORAGE (63 - 59)
diff --git a/s390x/skey.c b/s390x/skey.c
index edad53e9..32bf1070 100644
--- a/s390x/skey.c
+++ b/s390x/skey.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#include <libcflat.h>
#include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
#include <asm/interrupt.h>
+#include <vmalloc.h>
#include <asm/page.h>
#include <asm/facility.h>
#include <asm/mem.h>
@@ -118,6 +119,249 @@ static void test_invalid_address(void)
report_prefix_pop();
}
+static void test_test_protection(void)
+{
+ unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)pagebuf;
+
+ report_prefix_push("TPROT");
+
+ set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x10, 0);
+ report(tprot(addr, 0) == TPROT_READ_WRITE, "zero key: no protection");
+ report(tprot(addr, 1) == TPROT_READ_WRITE, "matching key: no protection");
+
+ report_prefix_push("mismatching key");
+
+ report(tprot(addr, 2) == TPROT_READ, "no fetch protection: store protection");
+
+ set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x18, 0);
+ report(tprot(addr, 2) == TPROT_RW_PROTECTED,
+ "fetch protection: fetch & store protection");
+
+ report_prefix_push("fetch-protection override");
+ set_storage_key(0, 0x18, 0);
+ report(tprot(0, 2) == TPROT_RW_PROTECTED, "disabled: fetch & store protection");
+ ctl_set_bit(0, CTL0_FETCH_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE);
+ report(tprot(0, 2) == TPROT_READ, "enabled: store protection");
+ report(tprot(2048, 2) == TPROT_RW_PROTECTED, "invalid: fetch & store protection");
+ ctl_clear_bit(0, CTL0_FETCH_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE);
+ set_storage_key(0, 0x00, 0);
+ report_prefix_pop();
+
+ ctl_set_bit(0, CTL0_STORAGE_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE);
+ set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x90, 0);
+ report(tprot(addr, 2) == TPROT_READ_WRITE,
+ "storage-protection override: no protection");
+ ctl_clear_bit(0, CTL0_STORAGE_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE);
+
+ report_prefix_pop();
+ set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x00, 0);
+ report_prefix_pop();
+}
+
+/*
+ * Perform STORE CPU ADDRESS (STAP) instruction while temporarily executing
+ * with access key 1.
+ */
+static void store_cpu_address_key_1(uint16_t *out)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "spka 0x10\n\t"
+ "stap %0\n\t"
+ "spka 0\n"
+ : "+Q" (*out) /* exception: old value remains in out -> + constraint */
+ );
+}
+
+static void test_store_cpu_address(void)
+{
+ uint16_t *out = (uint16_t *)pagebuf;
+ uint16_t cpu_addr;
+
+ report_prefix_push("STORE CPU ADDRESS");
+ asm ("stap %0" : "=Q" (cpu_addr));
+
+ report_prefix_push("zero key");
+ set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x20, 0);
+ WRITE_ONCE(*out, 0xbeef);
+ asm ("stap %0" : "=Q" (*out));
+ report(*out == cpu_addr, "store occurred");
+ report_prefix_pop();
+
+ report_prefix_push("matching key");
+ set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x10, 0);
+ *out = 0xbeef;
+ store_cpu_address_key_1(out);
+ report(*out == cpu_addr, "store occurred");
+ report_prefix_pop();
+
+ report_prefix_push("mismatching key");
+ set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x20, 0);
+ expect_pgm_int();
+ *out = 0xbeef;
+ store_cpu_address_key_1(out);
+ check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_PROTECTION);
+ report(*out == 0xbeef, "no store occurred");
+ report_prefix_pop();
+
+ ctl_set_bit(0, CTL0_STORAGE_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE);
+
+ report_prefix_push("storage-protection override, invalid key");
+ set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x20, 0);
+ expect_pgm_int();
+ *out = 0xbeef;
+ store_cpu_address_key_1(out);
+ check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_PROTECTION);
+ report(*out == 0xbeef, "no store occurred");
+ report_prefix_pop();
+
+ report_prefix_push("storage-protection override, override key");
+ set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x90, 0);
+ *out = 0xbeef;
+ store_cpu_address_key_1(out);
+ report(*out == cpu_addr, "override occurred");
+ report_prefix_pop();
+
+ ctl_clear_bit(0, CTL0_STORAGE_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE);
+
+ report_prefix_push("storage-protection override disabled, override key");
+ set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x90, 0);
+ expect_pgm_int();
+ *out = 0xbeef;
+ store_cpu_address_key_1(out);
+ check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_PROTECTION);
+ report(*out == 0xbeef, "no store occurred");
+ report_prefix_pop();
+
+ set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x00, 0);
+ report_prefix_pop();
+}
+
+/*
+ * Perform SET PREFIX (SPX) instruction while temporarily executing
+ * with access key 1.
+ */
+static void set_prefix_key_1(uint32_t *prefix_ptr)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "spka 0x10\n\t"
+ "spx %0\n\t"
+ "spka 0\n"
+ :: "Q" (*prefix_ptr)
+ );
+}
+
+/*
+ * We remapped page 0, making the lowcore inaccessible, which breaks the normal
+ * handler and breaks skipping the faulting instruction.
+ * Just disable dynamic address translation to make things work.
+ */
+static void dat_fixup_pgm_int(void)
+{
+ uint64_t psw_mask = extract_psw_mask();
+
+ psw_mask &= ~PSW_MASK_DAT;
+ load_psw_mask(psw_mask);
+}
+
+#define PREFIX_AREA_SIZE (PAGE_SIZE * 2)
+static char lowcore_tmp[PREFIX_AREA_SIZE] __attribute__((aligned(PREFIX_AREA_SIZE)));
+
+/*
+ * Test accessibility of the operand to SET PREFIX given different configurations
+ * with regards to storage keys. That is, check the accessibility of the location
+ * holding the new prefix, not that of the new prefix area. The new prefix area
+ * is a valid lowcore, so that the test does not crash on failure.
+ */
+static void test_set_prefix(void)
+{
+ uint32_t *prefix_ptr = (uint32_t *)pagebuf;
+ uint32_t *no_override_prefix_ptr;
+ uint32_t old_prefix;
+ pgd_t *root;
+
+ report_prefix_push("SET PREFIX");
+ root = (pgd_t *)(stctg(1) & PAGE_MASK);
+ old_prefix = get_prefix();
+ memcpy(lowcore_tmp, 0, sizeof(lowcore_tmp));
+ assert(((uint64_t)&lowcore_tmp >> 31) == 0);
+ *prefix_ptr = (uint32_t)(uint64_t)&lowcore_tmp;
+
+ report_prefix_push("zero key");
+ set_prefix(old_prefix);
+ set_storage_key(prefix_ptr, 0x20, 0);
+ set_prefix(*prefix_ptr);
+ report(get_prefix() == *prefix_ptr, "set prefix");
+ report_prefix_pop();
+
+ report_prefix_push("matching key");
+ set_prefix(old_prefix);
+ set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x10, 0);
+ set_prefix_key_1(prefix_ptr);
+ report(get_prefix() == *prefix_ptr, "set prefix");
+ report_prefix_pop();
+
+ report_prefix_push("mismatching key");
+
+ report_prefix_push("no fetch protection");
+ set_prefix(old_prefix);
+ set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x20, 0);
+ set_prefix_key_1(prefix_ptr);
+ report(get_prefix() == *prefix_ptr, "set prefix");
+ report_prefix_pop();
+
+ report_prefix_push("fetch protection");
+ set_prefix(old_prefix);
+ set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x28, 0);
+ expect_pgm_int();
+ set_prefix_key_1(prefix_ptr);
+ check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_PROTECTION);
+ report(get_prefix() == old_prefix, "did not set prefix");
+ report_prefix_pop();
+
+ register_pgm_cleanup_func(dat_fixup_pgm_int);
+
+ report_prefix_push("remapped page, fetch protection");
+ set_prefix(old_prefix);
+ set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x28, 0);
+ expect_pgm_int();
+ install_page(root, virt_to_pte_phys(root, pagebuf), 0);
+ set_prefix_key_1((uint32_t *)0);
+ install_page(root, 0, 0);
+ check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_PROTECTION);
+ report(get_prefix() == old_prefix, "did not set prefix");
+ report_prefix_pop();
+
+ ctl_set_bit(0, CTL0_FETCH_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE);
+
+ report_prefix_push("fetch protection override applies");
+ set_prefix(old_prefix);
+ set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x28, 0);
+ install_page(root, virt_to_pte_phys(root, pagebuf), 0);
+ set_prefix_key_1((uint32_t *)0);
+ install_page(root, 0, 0);
+ report(get_prefix() == *prefix_ptr, "set prefix");
+ report_prefix_pop();
+
+ no_override_prefix_ptr = (uint32_t *)(pagebuf + 2048);
+ WRITE_ONCE(*no_override_prefix_ptr, (uint32_t)(uint64_t)&lowcore_tmp);
+ report_prefix_push("fetch protection override does not apply");
+ set_prefix(old_prefix);
+ set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x28, 0);
+ expect_pgm_int();
+ install_page(root, virt_to_pte_phys(root, pagebuf), 0);
+ set_prefix_key_1((uint32_t *)2048);
+ install_page(root, 0, 0);
+ check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_PROTECTION);
+ report(get_prefix() == old_prefix, "did not set prefix");
+ report_prefix_pop();
+
+ ctl_clear_bit(0, CTL0_FETCH_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE);
+ register_pgm_cleanup_func(NULL);
+ report_prefix_pop();
+ set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x00, 0);
+ report_prefix_pop();
+}
+
int main(void)
{
report_prefix_push("skey");
@@ -130,6 +374,11 @@ int main(void)
test_set();
test_set_mb();
test_chg();
+ test_test_protection();
+ test_store_cpu_address();
+
+ setup_vm();
+ test_set_prefix();
done:
report_prefix_pop();
return report_summary();
--
2.33.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 2/3] s390x: Test effect of storage keys on some instructions
2022-05-02 15:41 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 2/3] s390x: Test effect of storage keys on some instructions Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
@ 2022-05-04 12:46 ` Janosch Frank
2022-05-04 13:29 ` Thomas Huth
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Janosch Frank @ 2022-05-04 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch, Thomas Huth, Claudio Imbrenda
Cc: David Hildenbrand, kvm, linux-s390
On 5/2/22 17:41, Janis Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
> Some instructions are emulated by KVM. Test that KVM correctly emulates
> storage key checking for two of those instructions (STORE CPU ADDRESS,
> SET PREFIX).
> Test success and error conditions, including coverage of storage and
> fetch protection override.
> Also add test for TEST PROTECTION, even if that instruction will not be
> emulated by KVM under normal conditions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h | 20 ++--
> s390x/skey.c | 249 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 260 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
> index 46c370e6..72553819 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
> +++ b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
> @@ -55,15 +55,17 @@ struct psw {
> #define PSW_MASK_BA 0x0000000080000000UL
> #define PSW_MASK_64 (PSW_MASK_BA | PSW_MASK_EA)
>
> -#define CTL0_LOW_ADDR_PROT (63 - 35)
> -#define CTL0_EDAT (63 - 40)
> -#define CTL0_IEP (63 - 43)
> -#define CTL0_AFP (63 - 45)
> -#define CTL0_VECTOR (63 - 46)
> -#define CTL0_EMERGENCY_SIGNAL (63 - 49)
> -#define CTL0_EXTERNAL_CALL (63 - 50)
> -#define CTL0_CLOCK_COMPARATOR (63 - 52)
> -#define CTL0_SERVICE_SIGNAL (63 - 54)
> +#define CTL0_LOW_ADDR_PROT (63 - 35)
> +#define CTL0_EDAT (63 - 40)
> +#define CTL0_FETCH_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE (63 - 38)
> +#define CTL0_STORAGE_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE (63 - 39)
> +#define CTL0_IEP (63 - 43)
> +#define CTL0_AFP (63 - 45)
> +#define CTL0_VECTOR (63 - 46)
> +#define CTL0_EMERGENCY_SIGNAL (63 - 49)
> +#define CTL0_EXTERNAL_CALL (63 - 50)
> +#define CTL0_CLOCK_COMPARATOR (63 - 52)
> +#define CTL0_SERVICE_SIGNAL (63 - 54)
> #define CR0_EXTM_MASK 0x0000000000006200UL /* Combined external masks */
>
> #define CTL2_GUARDED_STORAGE (63 - 59)
> diff --git a/s390x/skey.c b/s390x/skey.c
> index edad53e9..32bf1070 100644
> --- a/s390x/skey.c
> +++ b/s390x/skey.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> #include <libcflat.h>
> #include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
> #include <asm/interrupt.h>
> +#include <vmalloc.h>
> #include <asm/page.h>
> #include <asm/facility.h>
> #include <asm/mem.h>
> @@ -118,6 +119,249 @@ static void test_invalid_address(void)
> report_prefix_pop();
> }
>
> +static void test_test_protection(void)
> +{
> + unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)pagebuf;
> +
> + report_prefix_push("TPROT");
> +
> + set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x10, 0);
> + report(tprot(addr, 0) == TPROT_READ_WRITE, "zero key: no protection");
> + report(tprot(addr, 1) == TPROT_READ_WRITE, "matching key: no protection");
> +
> + report_prefix_push("mismatching key");
> +
> + report(tprot(addr, 2) == TPROT_READ, "no fetch protection: store protection");
> +
> + set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x18, 0);
> + report(tprot(addr, 2) == TPROT_RW_PROTECTED,
> + "fetch protection: fetch & store protection");
> +
> + report_prefix_push("fetch-protection override");
> + set_storage_key(0, 0x18, 0);
> + report(tprot(0, 2) == TPROT_RW_PROTECTED, "disabled: fetch & store protection");
> + ctl_set_bit(0, CTL0_FETCH_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE);
> + report(tprot(0, 2) == TPROT_READ, "enabled: store protection");
> + report(tprot(2048, 2) == TPROT_RW_PROTECTED, "invalid: fetch & store protection");
> + ctl_clear_bit(0, CTL0_FETCH_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE);
> + set_storage_key(0, 0x00, 0);
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +
> + ctl_set_bit(0, CTL0_STORAGE_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE);
> + set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x90, 0);
> + report(tprot(addr, 2) == TPROT_READ_WRITE,
> + "storage-protection override: no protection");
> + ctl_clear_bit(0, CTL0_STORAGE_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE);
> +
> + report_prefix_pop();
> + set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x00, 0);
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Perform STORE CPU ADDRESS (STAP) instruction while temporarily executing
> + * with access key 1.
> + */
> +static void store_cpu_address_key_1(uint16_t *out)
> +{
> + asm volatile (
> + "spka 0x10\n\t"
> + "stap %0\n\t"
> + "spka 0\n"
> + : "+Q" (*out) /* exception: old value remains in out -> + constraint */
> + );
> +}
> +
> +static void test_store_cpu_address(void)
> +{
> + uint16_t *out = (uint16_t *)pagebuf;
> + uint16_t cpu_addr;
> +
> + report_prefix_push("STORE CPU ADDRESS");
> + asm ("stap %0" : "=Q" (cpu_addr));
> +
> + report_prefix_push("zero key");
> + set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x20, 0);
> + WRITE_ONCE(*out, 0xbeef);
> + asm ("stap %0" : "=Q" (*out));
> + report(*out == cpu_addr, "store occurred");
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +
> + report_prefix_push("matching key");
> + set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x10, 0);
> + *out = 0xbeef;
> + store_cpu_address_key_1(out);
> + report(*out == cpu_addr, "store occurred");
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +
> + report_prefix_push("mismatching key");
> + set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x20, 0);
> + expect_pgm_int();
> + *out = 0xbeef;
> + store_cpu_address_key_1(out);
> + check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_PROTECTION);
> + report(*out == 0xbeef, "no store occurred");
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +
> + ctl_set_bit(0, CTL0_STORAGE_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE);
> +
> + report_prefix_push("storage-protection override, invalid key");
> + set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x20, 0);
> + expect_pgm_int();
> + *out = 0xbeef;
> + store_cpu_address_key_1(out);
> + check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_PROTECTION);
> + report(*out == 0xbeef, "no store occurred");
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +
> + report_prefix_push("storage-protection override, override key");
> + set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x90, 0);
> + *out = 0xbeef;
> + store_cpu_address_key_1(out);
> + report(*out == cpu_addr, "override occurred");
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +
> + ctl_clear_bit(0, CTL0_STORAGE_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE);
> +
> + report_prefix_push("storage-protection override disabled, override key");
> + set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x90, 0);
> + expect_pgm_int();
> + *out = 0xbeef;
> + store_cpu_address_key_1(out);
> + check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_PROTECTION);
> + report(*out == 0xbeef, "no store occurred");
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +
> + set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x00, 0);
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Perform SET PREFIX (SPX) instruction while temporarily executing
> + * with access key 1.
> + */
> +static void set_prefix_key_1(uint32_t *prefix_ptr)
> +{
> + asm volatile (
> + "spka 0x10\n\t"
> + "spx %0\n\t"
> + "spka 0\n"
> + :: "Q" (*prefix_ptr)
> + );
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * We remapped page 0, making the lowcore inaccessible, which breaks the normal
> + * handler and breaks skipping the faulting instruction.
> + * Just disable dynamic address translation to make things work.
> + */
> +static void dat_fixup_pgm_int(void)
> +{
> + uint64_t psw_mask = extract_psw_mask();
> +
> + psw_mask &= ~PSW_MASK_DAT;
> + load_psw_mask(psw_mask);
> +}
> +
> +#define PREFIX_AREA_SIZE (PAGE_SIZE * 2)
> +static char lowcore_tmp[PREFIX_AREA_SIZE] __attribute__((aligned(PREFIX_AREA_SIZE)));
> +
> +/*
> + * Test accessibility of the operand to SET PREFIX given different configurations
> + * with regards to storage keys. That is, check the accessibility of the location
> + * holding the new prefix, not that of the new prefix area. The new prefix area
> + * is a valid lowcore, so that the test does not crash on failure.
> + */
> +static void test_set_prefix(void)
> +{
> + uint32_t *prefix_ptr = (uint32_t *)pagebuf;
> + uint32_t *no_override_prefix_ptr;
> + uint32_t old_prefix;
> + pgd_t *root;
> +
> + report_prefix_push("SET PREFIX");
> + root = (pgd_t *)(stctg(1) & PAGE_MASK);
> + old_prefix = get_prefix();
> + memcpy(lowcore_tmp, 0, sizeof(lowcore_tmp));
> + assert(((uint64_t)&lowcore_tmp >> 31) == 0);
> + *prefix_ptr = (uint32_t)(uint64_t)&lowcore_tmp;
> +
> + report_prefix_push("zero key");
> + set_prefix(old_prefix);
> + set_storage_key(prefix_ptr, 0x20, 0);
> + set_prefix(*prefix_ptr);
> + report(get_prefix() == *prefix_ptr, "set prefix");
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +
> + report_prefix_push("matching key");
> + set_prefix(old_prefix);
> + set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x10, 0);
> + set_prefix_key_1(prefix_ptr);
> + report(get_prefix() == *prefix_ptr, "set prefix");
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +
> + report_prefix_push("mismatching key");
> +
> + report_prefix_push("no fetch protection");
> + set_prefix(old_prefix);
> + set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x20, 0);
> + set_prefix_key_1(prefix_ptr);
> + report(get_prefix() == *prefix_ptr, "set prefix");
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +
> + report_prefix_push("fetch protection");
> + set_prefix(old_prefix);
> + set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x28, 0);
> + expect_pgm_int();
> + set_prefix_key_1(prefix_ptr);
> + check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_PROTECTION);
> + report(get_prefix() == old_prefix, "did not set prefix");
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +
> + register_pgm_cleanup_func(dat_fixup_pgm_int);
> +
> + report_prefix_push("remapped page, fetch protection");
> + set_prefix(old_prefix);
> + set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x28, 0);
> + expect_pgm_int();
> + install_page(root, virt_to_pte_phys(root, pagebuf), 0);
> + set_prefix_key_1((uint32_t *)0);
> + install_page(root, 0, 0);
> + check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_PROTECTION);
> + report(get_prefix() == old_prefix, "did not set prefix");
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +
> + ctl_set_bit(0, CTL0_FETCH_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE);
> +
> + report_prefix_push("fetch protection override applies");
> + set_prefix(old_prefix);
> + set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x28, 0);
> + install_page(root, virt_to_pte_phys(root, pagebuf), 0);
> + set_prefix_key_1((uint32_t *)0);
> + install_page(root, 0, 0);
> + report(get_prefix() == *prefix_ptr, "set prefix");
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +
> + no_override_prefix_ptr = (uint32_t *)(pagebuf + 2048);
> + WRITE_ONCE(*no_override_prefix_ptr, (uint32_t)(uint64_t)&lowcore_tmp);
> + report_prefix_push("fetch protection override does not apply");
> + set_prefix(old_prefix);
> + set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x28, 0);
> + expect_pgm_int();
> + install_page(root, virt_to_pte_phys(root, pagebuf), 0);
> + set_prefix_key_1((uint32_t *)2048);
> + install_page(root, 0, 0);
> + check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_PROTECTION);
> + report(get_prefix() == old_prefix, "did not set prefix");
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +
> + ctl_clear_bit(0, CTL0_FETCH_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE);
> + register_pgm_cleanup_func(NULL);
> + report_prefix_pop();
> + set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x00, 0);
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +}
> +
> int main(void)
> {
> report_prefix_push("skey");
> @@ -130,6 +374,11 @@ int main(void)
> test_set();
> test_set_mb();
> test_chg();
> + test_test_protection();
> + test_store_cpu_address();
> +
> + setup_vm();
> + test_set_prefix();
> done:
> report_prefix_pop();
> return report_summary();
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 2/3] s390x: Test effect of storage keys on some instructions
2022-05-02 15:41 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 2/3] s390x: Test effect of storage keys on some instructions Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-05-04 12:46 ` Janosch Frank
@ 2022-05-04 13:29 ` Thomas Huth
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Huth @ 2022-05-04 13:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch, Janosch Frank, Claudio Imbrenda
Cc: David Hildenbrand, kvm, linux-s390
On 02/05/2022 17.41, Janis Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
> Some instructions are emulated by KVM. Test that KVM correctly emulates
> storage key checking for two of those instructions (STORE CPU ADDRESS,
> SET PREFIX).
> Test success and error conditions, including coverage of storage and
> fetch protection override.
> Also add test for TEST PROTECTION, even if that instruction will not be
> emulated by KVM under normal conditions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h | 20 ++--
> s390x/skey.c | 249 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 260 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 3/3] Disable s390x skey test in GitLab CI
2022-05-02 15:40 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 0/3] s390x: Test effect of storage keys on some instructions Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-05-02 15:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 1/3] s390x: Give name to return value of tprot() Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-05-02 15:41 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 2/3] s390x: Test effect of storage keys on some instructions Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
@ 2022-05-02 15:41 ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-05-05 13:16 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 0/3] s390x: Test effect of storage keys on some instructions Claudio Imbrenda
3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch @ 2022-05-02 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Huth, Janosch Frank, Claudio Imbrenda, Paolo Bonzini,
Andrew Jones
Cc: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch, David Hildenbrand, kvm, linux-s390
The test cases newly added to skey.c require kernel 5.18.
Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
---
.gitlab-ci.yml | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/.gitlab-ci.yml b/.gitlab-ci.yml
index 4f3049d8..e5768f1d 100644
--- a/.gitlab-ci.yml
+++ b/.gitlab-ci.yml
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ s390x-kvm:
- ./configure --arch=s390x
- make -j$(nproc)
- ACCEL=kvm ./run_tests.sh
- selftest-setup intercept emulator sieve sthyi skey diag10 diag308 pfmf
+ selftest-setup intercept emulator sieve sthyi diag10 diag308 pfmf
cmm vector gs iep cpumodel diag288 stsi sclp-1g sclp-3g css skrf sie
| tee results.txt
- grep -q PASS results.txt && ! grep -q FAIL results.txt
--
2.33.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 0/3] s390x: Test effect of storage keys on some instructions
2022-05-02 15:40 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 0/3] s390x: Test effect of storage keys on some instructions Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-05-02 15:41 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v7 3/3] Disable s390x skey test in GitLab CI Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
@ 2022-05-05 13:16 ` Claudio Imbrenda
3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Claudio Imbrenda @ 2022-05-05 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
Cc: Thomas Huth, Janosch Frank, David Hildenbrand, kvm, linux-s390
On Mon, 2 May 2022 17:40:58 +0200
Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> See range diff below for changes. Since I messed up the addressees
> for the cover letter for the last version, the diff is against v5.
looks good, if there are no objections I would queue this
>
> v6 -> v7:
> * Add fetch-protection override test case to TPROT test
> * Change reporting of TPROT test to be more in line with other tests
>
> v5 -> v6:
> * Disable skey test in GitLab CI, needs kernel 5.18
> * Added comment to test_set_prefix
> * Introduce names for tprot return values
>
> ...
>
> v2 -> v3:
> * fix asm for SET PREFIX zero key test: make input
> * implement Thomas' suggestions:
> https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/f050da01-4d50-5da5-7f08-6da30f5dbbbe@redhat.com/
>
> v1 -> v2:
> * use install_page instead of manual page table entry manipulation
> * check that no store occurred if none is expected
> * try to check that no fetch occurred if not expected, although in
> practice a fetch would probably cause the test to crash
> * reset storage key to 0 after test
>
>
> Janis Schoetterl-Glausch (3):
> s390x: Give name to return value of tprot()
> s390x: Test effect of storage keys on some instructions
> Disable s390x skey test in GitLab CI
>
> lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h | 31 +++--
> lib/s390x/sclp.c | 6 +-
> s390x/skey.c | 250 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> s390x/tprot.c | 24 ++--
> .gitlab-ci.yml | 2 +-
> 5 files changed, 286 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> Range-diff against v5:
> -: -------- > 1: 6b11f01d s390x: Give name to return value of tprot()
> 1: 89e59626 ! 2: e3df88c6 s390x: Test effect of storage keys on some instructions
> @@ s390x/skey.c: static void test_invalid_address(void)
> + report_prefix_push("TPROT");
> +
> + set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x10, 0);
> -+ report(tprot(addr, 0) == 0, "access key 0 -> no protection");
> -+ report(tprot(addr, 1) == 0, "access key matches -> no protection");
> -+ report(tprot(addr, 2) == 1, "access key mismatches, no fetch protection -> store protection");
> ++ report(tprot(addr, 0) == TPROT_READ_WRITE, "zero key: no protection");
> ++ report(tprot(addr, 1) == TPROT_READ_WRITE, "matching key: no protection");
> ++
> ++ report_prefix_push("mismatching key");
> ++
> ++ report(tprot(addr, 2) == TPROT_READ, "no fetch protection: store protection");
> ++
> +
> + set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x18, 0);
> -+ report(tprot(addr, 2) == 2, "access key mismatches, fetch protection -> fetch & store protection");
> ++ report(tprot(addr, 2) == TPROT_RW_PROTECTED,
> ++ "fetch protection: fetch & store protection");
> ++
> ++ report_prefix_push("fetch-protection override");
> ++ set_storage_key(0, 0x18, 0);
> ++ report(tprot(0, 2) == TPROT_RW_PROTECTED, "disabled: fetch & store protection");
> ++ ctl_set_bit(0, CTL0_FETCH_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE);
> ++ report(tprot(0, 2) == TPROT_READ, "enabled: store protection");
> ++ report(tprot(2048, 2) == TPROT_RW_PROTECTED, "invalid: fetch & store protection");
> ++ ctl_clear_bit(0, CTL0_FETCH_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE);
> ++ set_storage_key(0, 0x00, 0);
> ++ report_prefix_pop();
> +
> + ctl_set_bit(0, CTL0_STORAGE_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE);
> + set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x90, 0);
> -+ report(tprot(addr, 2) == 0, "access key mismatches, storage protection override -> no protection");
> ++ report(tprot(addr, 2) == TPROT_READ_WRITE,
> ++ "storage-protection override: no protection");
> + ctl_clear_bit(0, CTL0_STORAGE_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE);
> +
> ++ report_prefix_pop();
> + set_storage_key(pagebuf, 0x00, 0);
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +}
> @@ s390x/skey.c: static void test_invalid_address(void)
> +#define PREFIX_AREA_SIZE (PAGE_SIZE * 2)
> +static char lowcore_tmp[PREFIX_AREA_SIZE] __attribute__((aligned(PREFIX_AREA_SIZE)));
> +
> ++/*
> ++ * Test accessibility of the operand to SET PREFIX given different configurations
> ++ * with regards to storage keys. That is, check the accessibility of the location
> ++ * holding the new prefix, not that of the new prefix area. The new prefix area
> ++ * is a valid lowcore, so that the test does not crash on failure.
> ++ */
> +static void test_set_prefix(void)
> +{
> + uint32_t *prefix_ptr = (uint32_t *)pagebuf;
> -: -------- > 3: c3236718 Disable s390x skey test in GitLab CI
>
> base-commit: 6a7a83ed106211fc0ee530a3a05f171f6a4c4e66
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread