From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/3] s390x: Fix sclp facility bit numbers
Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 14:46:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220505124656.1954092-2-scgl@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220505124656.1954092-1-scgl@linux.ibm.com>
sclp_feat_check takes care of adjusting the bit numbering such that they
can be defined as they are in the documentation.
Fixes: 4dd649c8 ("lib: s390x: sclp: Extend feature probing")
Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>
---
lib/s390x/sclp.h | 16 +++++++++-------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/s390x/sclp.h b/lib/s390x/sclp.h
index fead007a..4ce2209f 100644
--- a/lib/s390x/sclp.h
+++ b/lib/s390x/sclp.h
@@ -134,13 +134,15 @@ struct sclp_facilities {
};
/* bit number within a certain byte */
-#define SCLP_FEAT_85_BIT_GSLS 7
-#define SCLP_FEAT_98_BIT_KSS 0
-#define SCLP_FEAT_116_BIT_64BSCAO 7
-#define SCLP_FEAT_116_BIT_CMMA 6
-#define SCLP_FEAT_116_BIT_ESCA 3
-#define SCLP_FEAT_117_BIT_PFMFI 6
-#define SCLP_FEAT_117_BIT_IBS 5
+#define SCLP_FEAT_80_BIT_SOP 2
+#define SCLP_FEAT_85_BIT_GSLS 0
+#define SCLP_FEAT_85_BIT_ESOP 6
+#define SCLP_FEAT_98_BIT_KSS 7
+#define SCLP_FEAT_116_BIT_64BSCAO 0
+#define SCLP_FEAT_116_BIT_CMMA 1
+#define SCLP_FEAT_116_BIT_ESCA 4
+#define SCLP_FEAT_117_BIT_PFMFI 1
+#define SCLP_FEAT_117_BIT_IBS 2
typedef struct ReadInfo {
SCCBHeader h;
--
2.33.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-05 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-05 12:46 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/3] s390x: More storage key instruction Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-05-05 12:46 ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch [this message]
2022-05-06 15:31 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/3] s390x: Fix sclp facility bit numbers Claudio Imbrenda
2022-05-10 17:13 ` Janosch Frank
2022-05-10 17:13 ` Janosch Frank
2022-05-11 9:48 ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-05-05 12:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/3] s390x: Test TEID values in storage key test Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-05-06 15:37 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-05-09 13:39 ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-05-05 12:46 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 3/3] s390x: Test effect of storage keys on some more instructions Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-05-06 16:52 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-05-09 14:07 ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-05-20 19:08 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/3] s390x: Rework TEID decoding and usage Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-05-20 19:08 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/3] s390x: Fix sclp facility bit numbers Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220505124656.1954092-2-scgl@linux.ibm.com \
--to=scgl@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox