From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Longfang Liu <liulongfang@huawei.com>,
Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>,
Abhishek Sahu <abhsahu@nvidia.com>,
Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] vfio/pci: Have all VFIO PCI drivers store the vfio_pci_core_device in drvdata
Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 16:28:59 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220505192859.GX49344@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220505125409.7388d369.alex.williamson@redhat.com>
On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 12:54:09PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > I'd also rather see the variant driver fail to register with the core
> > > than to see a failure opening the device an arbitrary time later.
> >
> > It still permits a driver to be wrong, eg all the drivers are like
> > this today:
> >
> > ret = vfio_pci_core_register_device(&hisi_acc_vdev->core_device);
> > if (ret)
> > goto out_free;
> > dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, &hisi_acc_vdev->core_device);
> >
> > So a WARN_ON inside register_device will not catch the mistake, as
> > this is the common pattern it isn't as helpful.
>
> In the above case the WARN_ON would trigger because drvdata isn't set
> to the core device for the registration call. Yes, a driver could
> still set drvdata after the registration call, but then they get to
> explain why they set drvdata twice and thought they could get away with
> changing it after the core made pretty clear that it wants a specific
> thing there. Thanks,
I'm OK with this idea, it is not quite a nice to set the drvdata in
the middle of the probe function, but it does work here.
I'll fix it
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-05 19:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-04 19:01 [PATCH v3 0/2] Remove vfio_device_get_from_dev() Jason Gunthorpe
2022-05-04 19:01 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] vfio/pci: Have all VFIO PCI drivers store the vfio_pci_core_device in drvdata Jason Gunthorpe
2022-05-05 18:10 ` Alex Williamson
2022-05-05 18:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-05-05 18:54 ` Alex Williamson
2022-05-05 19:28 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2022-05-04 19:01 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] vfio/pci: Remove vfio_device_get_from_dev() Jason Gunthorpe
2022-05-04 20:20 ` Kirti Wankhede
2022-05-04 21:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-05-06 21:08 ` Alex Williamson
2022-05-04 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220505192859.GX49344@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=abhsahu@nvidia.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=liulongfang@huawei.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox