From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
borntraeger@de.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
david@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com,
hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, pmorel@linux.ibm.com,
wintera@linux.ibm.com, seiden@linux.ibm.com, nrb@linux.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH v9 3/3] s390x: KVM: resetting the Topology-Change-Report
Date: Fri, 6 May 2022 11:24:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220506092403.47406-4-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220506092403.47406-1-pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
During a subsystem reset the Topology-Change-Report is cleared.
Let's give userland the possibility to clear the MTCR in the case
of a subsystem reset.
To migrate the MTCR, let's give userland the possibility to
query the MTCR state.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 5 ++
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 84 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
index 7a6b14874d65..abdcf4069343 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
@@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ struct kvm_s390_io_adapter_req {
#define KVM_S390_VM_CRYPTO 2
#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MODEL 3
#define KVM_S390_VM_MIGRATION 4
+#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_TOPOLOGY 5
/* kvm attributes for mem_ctrl */
#define KVM_S390_VM_MEM_ENABLE_CMMA 0
@@ -171,6 +172,10 @@ struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_subfunc {
#define KVM_S390_VM_MIGRATION_START 1
#define KVM_S390_VM_MIGRATION_STATUS 2
+/* kvm attributes for cpu topology */
+#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_TOPO_MTR_CLEAR 0
+#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_TOPO_MTR_SET 1
+
/* for KVM_GET_REGS and KVM_SET_REGS */
struct kvm_regs {
/* general purpose regs for s390 */
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index c8bdce31464f..80a1244f0ead 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -1731,6 +1731,76 @@ static void kvm_s390_sca_set_mtcr(struct kvm *kvm)
ipte_unlock(kvm);
}
+/**
+ * kvm_s390_sca_clear_mtcr
+ * @kvm: guest KVM description
+ *
+ * Is only relevant if the topology facility is present,
+ * the caller should check KVM facility 11
+ *
+ * Updates the Multiprocessor Topology-Change-Report to signal
+ * the guest with a topology change.
+ */
+static void kvm_s390_sca_clear_mtcr(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+ struct bsca_block *sca = kvm->arch.sca; /* SCA version doesn't matter */
+
+ ipte_lock(kvm);
+ sca->utility &= ~SCA_UTILITY_MTCR;
+ ipte_unlock(kvm);
+}
+
+static int kvm_s390_set_topology(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
+{
+ if (!test_kvm_facility(kvm, 11))
+ return -ENXIO;
+
+ switch (attr->attr) {
+ case KVM_S390_VM_CPU_TOPO_MTR_SET:
+ kvm_s390_sca_set_mtcr(kvm);
+ break;
+ case KVM_S390_VM_CPU_TOPO_MTR_CLEAR:
+ kvm_s390_sca_clear_mtcr(kvm);
+ break;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/**
+ * kvm_s390_sca_get_mtcr
+ * @kvm: guest KVM description
+ *
+ * Is only relevant if the topology facility is present,
+ * the caller should check KVM facility 11
+ *
+ * reports to QEMU the Multiprocessor Topology-Change-Report.
+ */
+static int kvm_s390_sca_get_mtcr(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+ struct bsca_block *sca = kvm->arch.sca; /* SCA version doesn't matter */
+ int val;
+
+ ipte_lock(kvm);
+ val = !!(sca->utility & SCA_UTILITY_MTCR);
+ ipte_unlock(kvm);
+
+ return val;
+}
+
+static int kvm_s390_get_topology(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
+{
+ int mtcr;
+
+ if (!test_kvm_facility(kvm, 11))
+ return -ENXIO;
+
+ mtcr = kvm_s390_sca_get_mtcr(kvm);
+ if (copy_to_user((void __user *)attr->addr, &mtcr, sizeof(mtcr)))
+ return -EFAULT;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int kvm_s390_vm_set_attr(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
{
int ret;
@@ -1751,6 +1821,9 @@ static int kvm_s390_vm_set_attr(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
case KVM_S390_VM_MIGRATION:
ret = kvm_s390_vm_set_migration(kvm, attr);
break;
+ case KVM_S390_VM_CPU_TOPOLOGY:
+ ret = kvm_s390_set_topology(kvm, attr);
+ break;
default:
ret = -ENXIO;
break;
@@ -1776,6 +1849,9 @@ static int kvm_s390_vm_get_attr(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
case KVM_S390_VM_MIGRATION:
ret = kvm_s390_vm_get_migration(kvm, attr);
break;
+ case KVM_S390_VM_CPU_TOPOLOGY:
+ ret = kvm_s390_get_topology(kvm, attr);
+ break;
default:
ret = -ENXIO;
break;
@@ -1849,6 +1925,9 @@ static int kvm_s390_vm_has_attr(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
case KVM_S390_VM_MIGRATION:
ret = 0;
break;
+ case KVM_S390_VM_CPU_TOPOLOGY:
+ ret = test_kvm_facility(kvm, 11) ? 0 : -ENXIO;
+ break;
default:
ret = -ENXIO;
break;
--
2.27.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-06 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-06 9:24 [PATCH v9 0/3] s390x: KVM: CPU Topology Pierre Morel
2022-05-06 9:24 ` [PATCH v9 1/3] s390x: KVM: ipte lock for SCA access should be contained in KVM Pierre Morel
2022-05-12 9:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-05-16 16:30 ` Pierre Morel
2022-05-12 11:32 ` Janosch Frank
2022-05-16 14:13 ` Pierre Morel
2022-05-06 9:24 ` [PATCH v9 2/3] s390x: KVM: guest support for topology function Pierre Morel
2022-05-12 9:24 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-05-16 14:13 ` Pierre Morel
2022-06-17 14:49 ` Pierre Morel
2022-05-12 11:41 ` Janosch Frank
2022-05-16 10:41 ` Pierre Morel
2022-05-19 9:01 ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-05-19 9:23 ` Pierre Morel
2022-05-19 9:36 ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-05-06 9:24 ` Pierre Morel [this message]
2022-05-12 9:31 ` [PATCH v9 3/3] s390x: KVM: resetting the Topology-Change-Report David Hildenbrand
2022-05-12 9:52 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-05-12 10:01 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-05-16 14:21 ` Pierre Morel
2022-05-18 14:33 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-05-18 16:55 ` Pierre Morel
2022-05-16 10:36 ` Pierre Morel
2022-05-18 10:51 ` Pierre Morel
2022-05-18 15:26 ` [PATCH v9 0/3] s390x: KVM: CPU Topology Christian Borntraeger
2022-05-18 16:41 ` Pierre Morel
2022-05-19 5:46 ` Heiko Carstens
2022-05-19 8:07 ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-05-19 9:02 ` Pierre Morel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220506092403.47406-4-pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=wintera@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox